Team:Johns Hopkins/Project

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 02:31, 28 October 2010

Abstract

If the goal of iGEM and the Parts Registry is to take the messy world of genetic engineering and transform it into something like the standardized world of electrical engineering, it may be useful if electronic systems could directly interface with biological systems. Past iGEM projects have used chemical or optical stimuli to actuate transcriptional responses. Our project, however, seeks to add voltage sensitivity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Baker’s yeast was chosen because in some sense yeast have a system that responds to voltage input. With a voltage stimulus one can open the voltage-gated calcium channels of yeast, causing calcium ions to rush into the cytoplasm. This causes calcineurin to dephosphorylate Crz1, which enters the nucleus and binds various promoters. Our group presents a library of characterized Crz1-sensitive binding sites of both naturally-occurring and synthetic varieties that can be integrated into promoters. Genes downstream of these promoters are thus voltage-regulated in media containing calcium.

The Plan, Visualized: In this image, the pathway we are utilizing is schematically represented in an extremely accurate fashion by blobs and arrows. The calcium channels (mid1 and cch1) are shown in blue. With electrostimulation, they admit calcium into the cell. This calcium activates the the orange protein phosphatase calcineurin which dephosphorylates the purple transcription factor Crz1p. The dephosphorylated version of Crz1p, Crz1, is rapidly transported into the nucleus where it acts on the purple and blue promoters, transcribing GFP and/or RFP. Ultimately, our system did not get as far as having two coexisting promoters, but that was the plan.

Aims

Show that voltage can be used to stimulate a transcriptional response in S. cerevisiae.
Develop a library of voltage-inducible elements with differing voltage response curves.
Determine the functional range of and optimized values for our system with respect to the following variables:
- Voltage applied
- Duration of voltage application
- Presence or absence of vesicular calcium pumps, yeast’s natural mode of intracellular calcium control
Develop an effective experimental apparatus to apply voltage and measure response.

Methods

Visualizing the Crz1 Transcription Factor

We wanted to visualize the behavior of Crz1 under electrostimulation, and confirm localization to the nucleus upon stimulation. The cells were induced, then mounted glass plate where they were imaged with a laser-scanning confocal microscope. GFP was observed to move in and out of the nucleus just 5 minutes after a voltage stimulus. In a given image, some cells displayed Crz1-GFP densely packed in the nucleus while other cells displayed Crz1-GFP in the cytoplasm, but excluded from the nucleus. Here we see a confirmation of the oscillating behavior described by Cai et al.

In the above video we can see the oscillatory behavior of Crz1-GFP after electrostimulation. Note that Crz1-GFP's oscillating movement into and out of the nucleus is not in phase throughout the cell population. Only a few cells actually exhibit a change in Crz1 localization during the course of the video.

Optimizing Parameters for the CDRE from the FKS2 Promoter

We wanted to find an optimal voltage amplitude and electrostimulation duration for yeast containing the CDRE-RFP plasmid. Shocking at 10V caused widespread cell death, so it was necessary to find a balance between transcription and cellular damage. CDRE-RFP were grown and passed into 96 well plate. The electroporator was used to shock the cells with voltages from 2-10V for 0-80 seconds. We found that optimal transcription occurs when electrostimulation voltage is 8V. We also needed at least 40 seconds of electrostimulation to see expression.

	2s	5s	10s	20s	40s	80s
10V	None	None	None	None	None	N/A
8V	None	None	None	None	High	High
6V	None	None	None	None	Moderate	High
4V	None	None	None	None	Low	Low

Cells were analyzed using the above described confocal microscopy. As such, our data are purely quantitative.

Qualitative Characterization of the FKS2 CDRE

Having decided on an optimal voltage, we then wanted to optimize the duration of electrostimulation. Additionally, these experiments provided the opportunity to compare yeast with and without functional PMC1 and VCX1 (vesicular calcium pumps). The data support a linear increase in expression of our RFP reporter with increased stimulation time. We also observe much higher expression in cells with vesicular pumps than in those without.

The graph to the left shows a increasing, linear relationship between electrostimulation time and expression of the RFP reporter.

FKS2 CDRE with vesicular pumps, 0 seconds shocking

FKS2 CDRE with vesicular pumps, 90 seconds shocking

FKS2 CDRE with vesicular pumps, 110 seconds shocking

In the images above we observe some constitutive expression of RFP in the FKS2 CDRE strain with the vesicular pumps. However, there is a linear increase in expression of the RFP reporter with increase in electrostimulation time up to 90 seconds.

FKS2 CDRE without vesicular pumps, 80 seconds shocking

FKS2 CDRE without vesicular pumps, 90 seconds shocking

FKS2 CDRE without vesicular pumps, 110 seconds shocking

FKS2 CDRE without vesicular pumps, 130 seconds shocking

Again, there is a linear relationship between stimulation duration and RFP reporter expression. However, in this case, the cells lacking vesicular pumps expressed less than those with vesicular pumps.

Quantitative Characterization of FKS2 CDRE and PMC1 CDRE in Vacuole Positive and Negative Yeast

At high time points, we observed that the unstimulated control often expressed as much as experimental samples. We postulated that this was a result of widespread cell death. While we normalized against OD, this can only account for cell density, not cell viability. We also noted that the data point at 40s (and later in one case) is consistently higher than many of the data with longer electrostimulation duration. We believe that this is the same effect. If this is so, it implies that the cell death that we observe is a steplike function of duration.

In this experiment, cells with the FKS2 CDRE and the PMC1 CDRE were grown and passed into two rows of a 96 well plate and shocked at 8V with an exposure time of 0-80 seconds to quantitate the relationship between electrostimulation time and expression of a fluorescent protein. We again investigated the effect of knocking out the PMC1 and VCX1 vesicular calcium pumps. The data for both pump positive and pump negative cells are shown below.

This plot shows the fluorescence intensity normalized by OD 8 hours after induction by electrostimulation in cells positive for vesicular calcium pumps and using the FKS2 UAS in the reporter's promoter

This plot shows the fluorescence intensity normalized by OD 8 hours after induction by electrostimulation in cells negative for vesicular calcium pumps and using the FKS2 UAS in the reporter's promoter

This plot shows the fluorescence intensity normalized by OD 8 hours after induction by electrostimulation in cells positive for vesicular calcium pumps and using the PMC1 UAS in the reporter's promoter

This plot shows the fluorescence intensity normalized by OD 8 hours after induction by electrostimulation in cells negative for vesicular calcium pumps and using the PMC1 UAS in the reporter's promoter

Future Research Plans

Finish categorizing the synthetic CDREs using our high throughput electrostimulation device.
Apply our optimized high throughput experimentation technique to a library of synthetic CDRE sequences we have developed to characterize their voltage activation domains. We hope this library might allow others to have a more fine-grained control over the voltage response in their cells.
Develop a genetic switch utilizing the repressible operator already present on FKS2.
Develop an iGEM-compatible plasmid for yeast with a yeast-optimized origin of replication and markers. A shuttle vector would also be useful, enabling DNA to be stored or copied in bacteria and quickly transfered for testing in yeast. Our project would not be possible in a prokaryotic chassis. We feel that iGEM's apparent focus on E. coli may hinder the development of parts and systems that require eukaryotic organisms.

References

Cyert MS. Calcineurin signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: how yeast go crazy in response to stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2003)
Long Cai, Chiraj K. Dalal & Michael B. Elowitz. Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature (2008).
Stathopoulos-Gerontides, et al. Yeast calcineurin regulates nuclear localization of the Crz1p transcription factor through dephosphorylation. Genes & Development (1999).
Yoshimoto et al. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression regulated by the calcineurin/Crz1p signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol. Chem. (2002).

@@ Line 128: / Line 128: @@
 <br>
-=='''Instrumentation'''==
-''For more detail please see our [[Team:Johns_Hopkins/Device|device page]].''
-We tried several approaches to electrostimulate our cells with both accuracy and precision, but without widespread cell death.  Our approaches are detailed below.<br><br>
-'''A Microfluidic Chip:'''<br>
-{|
-|[[Image:Mask.jpeg|400px|thumb|This is a schematic representation of the mask used for the fabrication of our microfluidic device.]]
-||
-*Consists of 300 micron-wide channels with titanium and gold electrodes to electrically stimulate the cells.
-**This approach would allow for great precision and accuracy in electrostimulation, because each cell could be treated with exactly the same electric field.
-**This approach would also allow for high throughput quantitation without high cell volumes (and the associated reagent, media, and time concerns), by virtue of its own low volume.
-*We completed the fabrication of this device and are currently perfecting the fabrication technique to improve device quality and performance.
-**Microfluidic fabrication is extremely challenging and costly and, for those reasons, we were forced to abandon this approach.
-*For further information about our construction and techniques, see our [[Team:Johns_Hopkins/Device#Device Design|fabrication protocol]].
-|}
-'''A homemade, aluminum foil-based electrode:'''<br>
-Suffice it to say that this device was sufficient for initial, qualitative tests but did not provide the consistency or usability for effective long-term use. Essentially, the device was 8 well plate with aluminum electrodes with a brass backing.  This design was quickly abandoned.
-'''An 8 well, gold-plated electrode:'''<br>
-{|
-|[[Image:Hightp.jpeg|500px|thumb|This is a quick photo of our delightfully multidiciplinary final setup.  As noted in the text to the left, it includes the electroporator, a 96 well plate, the function generator, and our oscilloscope.  Click for a high resolution version.]]
-||Finally, we have started using a gold-plated coaxial 8 well electroporator to electrostimulate the cells. It has shown excellent results and allows us to do large experiments using 96 well plates. In the image to the left, you can see our complete and final setup.
-*In the bottom left, the 96 well plates where we kept our cells.  These 96 well plates also fit into the flourometer and spectrophotometer that we used to quantify our cells' response.
-*Also in the bottom left, our 8 well gold-plated coaxial electroporator.  The electroporator fits neatly into a vertical column of wells in our 96 well plate, allowing us to easily subject multiple samples (i.e. with and without vesicles) to identical conditions, or to run a particular condition in up to 8-fold multiplicity.
-*On the lower right, the oscilloscope that shows the alternating current produced by the function generator
-*In the middle right, the function generator we used to produce the voltage that induced our cells.  In this image, it is set to 19 Hz alternating current.
-|}
 =='''Future Research Plans'''==