Team:UCSF/Protocols/Assays

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
<body>
<body>
<br>
<br>
-
<h3 style="font-weight:bold;">Illustration of the FACS-based assays for measuring killer cell activation</h3><br>
+
<h3 style="font-weight:bold;">Illustration of the reporter assays used for measuring killer cell activation</h3><br>
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/ac/Assays.png" />
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/ac/Assays.png" />
</div><br><br>
</div><br><br>
 +
<p> We made many devices for assay (we had a lot of ideas :) ), but unfortunately we ran into a problem with our idea to use cytotoxicity assays to measure the killing response. The problem was that the transient transfection/expression of our devices by electroporation was too low to see responses (<20% efficiency). The large amount of untransfected cells dominated the response. In brainstorming with our advisors we decided to use/substitute T cell activation assays as a reporter of potential killing response as they should be correlated. This assay format would allow us to look at transient transfected cell responses without a lot of background response from untransfected cells We looked at two reporter readout: one was activation of the NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) promoter driving GFP expression (by FACS), the other was IL-2 expression/secretion which is downstream of NFAT activation (by ELISA).</p>
</body>
</body>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 21:28, 27 October 2010


Illustration of the reporter assays used for measuring killer cell activation




We made many devices for assay (we had a lot of ideas :) ), but unfortunately we ran into a problem with our idea to use cytotoxicity assays to measure the killing response. The problem was that the transient transfection/expression of our devices by electroporation was too low to see responses (<20% efficiency). The large amount of untransfected cells dominated the response. In brainstorming with our advisors we decided to use/substitute T cell activation assays as a reporter of potential killing response as they should be correlated. This assay format would allow us to look at transient transfected cell responses without a lot of background response from untransfected cells We looked at two reporter readout: one was activation of the NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) promoter driving GFP expression (by FACS), the other was IL-2 expression/secretion which is downstream of NFAT activation (by ELISA).