"
Team:Harvard/human practices
From 2010.igem.org
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<p>There is huge controversy surrounding the use of genetic engineering in agriculture. Our project is intimately linked to the agricultural industry, so we will take some time to <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Harvard/human_practices/debate">explore</a> this controversy and present <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Harvard/human_practices/vision">our vision</a> for how the iGarden will fit into people's lives and impact their understanding of genetic engineering.</p> | <p>There is huge controversy surrounding the use of genetic engineering in agriculture. Our project is intimately linked to the agricultural industry, so we will take some time to <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Harvard/human_practices/debate">explore</a> this controversy and present <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Harvard/human_practices/vision">our vision</a> for how the iGarden will fit into people's lives and impact their understanding of genetic engineering.</p> | ||
| + | <p>While there is a great deal of information regarding agricultural genetic engineering presented throughout this section, we also took some time to find out what people in our community thought about this international topic. We interviewed and surveyed sixty individuals of the Cambridge community. These individuals were students, local farmers, and patrons of our local farmer markets. We asked which characteristics of plants these individuals would be most comfortable modifying, as well as if they would feel more comfortable growing their own genetically modified foods than purchasing from a conventional farm that produces genetically modified foods. We also asked whether or not each individual had a food allergy, and if he or she would be willing to eat food that was genetically modified to be hypoallergenic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | While the actual survey data can be found in the references page, overall, the individuals that we surveyed were more comfortable eating genetically modified foods from their own garden than from a conventional market. Improving the nutritional quality of plants was a high priority for 38 out of 60 individuals, trailed by flavor (22 out of 60). Changing color and removing allergens were low priorities (6 out of 60 each). There was a | ||
<br/><br/> | <br/><br/> | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 25 October 2010
human practices background our vision the iGarden kit virtual iGarden opinion poll recycling references
overview
There is huge controversy surrounding the use of genetic engineering in agriculture. Our project is intimately linked to the agricultural industry, so we will take some time to explore this controversy and present our vision for how the iGarden will fit into people's lives and impact their understanding of genetic engineering.
While there is a great deal of information regarding agricultural genetic engineering presented throughout this section, we also took some time to find out what people in our community thought about this international topic. We interviewed and surveyed sixty individuals of the Cambridge community. These individuals were students, local farmers, and patrons of our local farmer markets. We asked which characteristics of plants these individuals would be most comfortable modifying, as well as if they would feel more comfortable growing their own genetically modified foods than purchasing from a conventional farm that produces genetically modified foods. We also asked whether or not each individual had a food allergy, and if he or she would be willing to eat food that was genetically modified to be hypoallergenic.
While the actual survey data can be found in the references page, overall, the individuals that we surveyed were more comfortable eating genetically modified foods from their own garden than from a conventional market. Improving the nutritional quality of plants was a high priority for 38 out of 60 individuals, trailed by flavor (22 out of 60). Changing color and removing allergens were low priorities (6 out of 60 each). There was a
