"
Team:TU Delft/22 June 2010 content
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|H20 | |H20 | ||
|18 | |18 | ||
| + | |} | ||
The PCR reaction was run at varying annealing temperatures to figure out which temperature gave the best result. After analysis on gel we deduced that a temperature of 50 degrees Celsius was optimal. | The PCR reaction was run at varying annealing temperatures to figure out which temperature gave the best result. After analysis on gel we deduced that a temperature of 50 degrees Celsius was optimal. | ||
At the end of the day we performed a digestion reaction on the amplified PCR products as well as the previously isolated I10.34 | At the end of the day we performed a digestion reaction on the amplified PCR products as well as the previously isolated I10.34 | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 24 June 2010
We tried to compensate for yesterdays delays. We transformed 15 Biobricks from the distribution plates!
Some PCR reactions were performed on short BioBrick inserts which would eventually save time in the long-run (compared to transforming and plasmid isolation). The BioBricks involved were J61100, J61101, J61107, J61117, J61127 and B0034.
The protocol was as follows:
| - | uL |
| Master Mix | 25 |
| BB template (10x diluted) | 1 |
| Primers G00100 and G00101 | 3 |
| H20 | 18 |
The PCR reaction was run at varying annealing temperatures to figure out which temperature gave the best result. After analysis on gel we deduced that a temperature of 50 degrees Celsius was optimal.
At the end of the day we performed a digestion reaction on the amplified PCR products as well as the previously isolated I10.34
