"
Team:TU Delft/Project/rbs-characterization/results
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→RBS Characterization Results) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
} | } | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
| - | |||
</html> | </html> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
[[Image:TUDelft2010_Rbs_strength_boxplot.png]] | [[Image:TUDelft2010_Rbs_strength_boxplot.png]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <html><div id="rbs-results"></html> | ||
Compared to the B0032, the tested Anderson RBS'es turned out to be surprisingly weak. All 5 of them resulted in less expression than the reference expression. | Compared to the B0032, the tested Anderson RBS'es turned out to be surprisingly weak. All 5 of them resulted in less expression than the reference expression. | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 20 October 2010
RBS Characterization Results
The given relative strengths are displayed assuming B0034 as the unit (The standard as used by the partsregistry). B0032 is defined to have a strength of 0.3. Therefore in the plot below, the mean value of B0032 is fixed on 0.3.
Compared to the B0032, the tested Anderson RBS'es turned out to be surprisingly weak. All 5 of them resulted in less expression than the reference expression.
| RBS | Mean strength | Standard deviation |
| J61100 | 0.026560 | 0.005126 |
| J61117 | 0.123819 | 0.024725 |
| J61101 | 0.081210 | 0.013402 |
| J61107 | 0.019763 | 0.003963 |
| J61127 | 0.069657 | 0.007422 |
| B0032 | 0.300000 | 0.028316 |
