"
Team:Johns Hopkins/Notebook
From 2010.igem.org
SunPenguin (Talk | contribs) |
m |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
*** End of the alert box *** --> | *** End of the alert box *** --> | ||
| + | [[Image:IGEM_Banner_jpeg.jpg|960px|center|JHU.]] | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<head> | <head> | ||
| Line 59: | Line 60: | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
==Experiments== | ==Experiments== | ||
===Crz1-GFP Experiment=== | ===Crz1-GFP Experiment=== | ||
Revision as of 21:35, 18 October 2010
Contents |
Experiments
Crz1-GFP Experiment
Reason for doing the experiment: To establish whether shocking the cells induces calcium influx leading to CRZ1 nuclear localization.
Date: 21/7/10
Location: Imaging Center
Name of S. cerevisiae strain: Delta VCX1 Delta PMC1 with Crz1 tagged with GFP
Pictures and description of experimental apparatus:Our Device consisted of a 8 well plate with a cover slip bottom. In this we inserted two alluminium electrodes with brass backing, at a distance of 1mm from each other. The imaging was done on a Ziess confocal microscope.
Time interval between successive images: 2 seconds
Magnification: 100X.
Procedure:
The cells were cultured in suspension and then 100ul of this suspension was pipetted into the device between the electrodes and allowed to trickle to the bottom of the cell. A voltage of 3V was applied across the cell solution for a period of 5 minutes. The cells were being imaged with a picture taken every 2 seconds as they were being shocked. After 5 minutes a large majority of the cells have the Crz1 transcription factor concentrated in the nucleus in the cells near the live electrodes.
Representative images:
Conclusions and discussion:
From this experiment it is clear that there is a calcium influx into the cell on application of a voltage across the cell membrane. We have also established that there is a significant influx of Crz1 into the nucleus associated with this calcium influx as we expected. We hypothesis that the reason we saw Crz1 nuclear localisation only in cells very close to the live electrode because the voltage provided by the function generator was too low to reach across the gap, and so a hypothetical ground gets formed near the live electrode. Another reason may be that as our device has the electrodes at a large distance from each other, comparable x.
CDRE Optimization Experiment
Aim:
To hone in on the CDRE systems region of activation with respect to time of shocking. Also to compare yeast without PMC1 and VCX1 knocked out versus yeast with it knocked out to determine effect of the knockout on the CDRE systems expression levels.
Observations:
From the imaging of the shocked knock out yeast cells we find that the cells start expressing RFP after 90 seconds of shocking. We saw expression in all the samples between 90 and 130 seconds with a definite trend of increase. The overall expression of RFP was pretty low, however, and only a few of the total cells expressed. It was also difficult to establish cytosol localization of RFP due to clumping of cells. We saw no expression of RFP in the 0 second shock trial.
From imaging the non knock out yeast samples we found very high expression levels overall. There was constitutive expression in the negative control i.e. the 0 second shock trial, and the expression of RFP increased rapidly with increased shocking time, with maximum saturation at 50 seconds. After this its was not possible to visually distinguish weather there was any increase in expression levels. There was definite localization of RFP in the cytoplasm. In the non-knocked out samples, most of the cells expressed RFP. Another observation made during imaging was that the non-knock out cells were a lot healthier looking and bigger than the knock out cells.
Conclusions:
From this experiment we can conclude that the CDRE –RFP plasmid was successfully inserted into the PMC1, VCX1 knockout yeast strain. We can also establish that the activation of region of the CDRE –RFP system is between 90 and 130 seconds of shocking, with a definite increase in expression levels with an increase in time shocked. We can also establish that there is no constitutive expression of CDRE – RFP from the fact that there is no RFP seen in the 0 second control. The overall expression of the system is weak however and it is only after 110 seconds that more than half of the cells in the frame start to express. We also observed that the knock out cells are smaller and less healthy looking than the non knock out cells, which is probably because they are less able to deal with calcium shock induced by shocking and so more strained and unhealthy.
From the images of the non knocked out yeast we can see that there is significantly higher expression levels with constitutive expression. We also can see that the rate of increase in expression with time is much higher and the region where the CDRE gets activated is much earlier than with knocked out yeast. We theorize that the reason for this increased expression in non knocked out yeast could be because of a combination of two reasons. First, because they do not have PMC1 and VCX1 knocked they have the ability to pump calcium out of the cytosol and into vacuoles making them more resistant to calcium shock and hence more healthy and better able to express the RFP. The other possible reason is that PMC1 and/or VCX1 may have feedback loops, and as PMC1 does have constitutive expression the non knockout cells may be having their RFP expression rates amplified by this effect. We believe that a combination of these two effects causes the increased expression rates.
Results
CDRE Optimization
Control: no voltage, no RPF expression
| 2s | 5s | 10s | 20s | 40s | 80s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10V | None | None | None | None | None | N/A |
| 8V | None | None | None | None | High | High |
| 6V | None | None | None | None | Moderate | High |
| 4V | None | None | None | None | Low | Low |
Protocol
Plasmid Extraction
Reagents:
- Buffer P1 - Resuspension Buffer
50mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 10mM EDTA, 100ug/mL RNase A
Storage condition - 4oC after adding RNase A
Prep - Dissolve 6.06g Tris base, 3.72g EDTA-2H20 in 800mL dH20. Adjust the pH to 8.0 with HCl.
Adjust the volume to 1 liter with dH2O. Add 100mg RNase A per liter of P1. - Buffer P2 - Lysis Buffer
200mM NaOH, 1% SDS
Storage condition - RT
Dissolve 8.09g of NaOH pellets in 950mL dH2O, 50mL 20% SDS solution.
The final volume should be 1 liter. - Buffer N3 - Neutralization Buffer for spin columns.
Composition unknown
Storage condition - RT - PB Buffer - Binding Buffer
Composition Unknown (Proprietary)
Storage condition - RT - Buffer PE - Wash Buffer
Composition unknown
Storage condition - RT
Protocol:
- Innoculate 3-4 mL of the E. coli cells in glass tubes with the right selection resistance in LB (Luria Bertani) medium.
- Transfer solution to a 2 mL Eppendorf tube and spin down at max speed (~13,000 rpm) for 30 seconds.
- Pour out LB medium and repeat until all of the solution from the innoculation tube is pelleted at the bottom of the Eppendorf tube. Each spin down after the first requires one full minute.
- Re-suspend the pelleted E. coli in 250 µL Buffer P1 and transfer solution to micro-centrifuge tube provided by the Qiaprep Kit. (This can be the same tube as the 2 mL Eppendorf tube) This step requires a strong vortex in order to fully re-suspend the pelleted cells. May require 3-4 minutes of continuous agitation.
- Add 250 µL of Buffer P2 and mix gently by inverting the tube 4-6 times. Be very gentle! Shear stresses can ruin the experiment after the lysis of cells from P2 Buffer.
- Add 350 µL of Buffer N3 and mix immediately and thoroughly by inverting the tube 4-6 times.
- Spin down at max speed for 10 minutes. A white pellet near the bottom and side of the walls will form.
- Extract the supernatant and add 500 µL of PB buffer. Place mixture into the Qiaprep spin column.
- Centrifuge mixture for 1 minute, max speed.
- Remove liquid at bottom.
- Add 750 µL of PE Buffer to Qiaprep spin column.
- Centrifuge mixture for 1 minute, max speed.
- Remove liquid at bottom and centrifuge again for 1 minute at max speed to remove more of the PE buffer.
- Transfer Qiaprep spin column to sterile Eppendorf tube and add 50 µL of dH2O and let the spin column equilibrate for 10 minutes with the dH2O.
- Spin down column for 1 minute, max speed.
- Confirm size with gel electrophoresis with 1% agarose gel and appropriate DNA Ladder. (Remember circular plasmids can become supercoiled and produce smaller apparent sizes on the gel)
- Use Nanodrop™ to confirm DNA concentration.
Yeast Transformation
To transform a desired plasmid into a host yeast cell.
Date: 8/25/10 Used to transform ref-GFP
Reagents:
- PEG-TE LiOAc
10 mL 10x TE
10 mL 1 M LiOAc
80 mL 50% PEG (3350 mw)
Mix with stir bar, filter sterilize, store at 4 °C - TE-LiOAc
10 mL 10x TE
10 mL 1 M LiOAc
80 mL H2O
- 10x TE
70 mL Tris Base (1M)
30 mL 1M Tris-Cl
20 mL 0.5 M EDTA: pH 8.0
880 mL diH2O
Autoclave: 45 min - SsDNA-(Stratagene #201190-81)
Sonicated Salmon Sperm DNA
ssDNA: 10mg/mL; 1 mL vial
Store at -20°C - 1 M Lithium Acetate-(LiOAc: Sigm L-6883)
102.0 g LiOAc
Bring to 1L diH2O
Autoclave 45 min. - 50% PEG-3350-(Sigma P-4338)
250g PEG to 250 mL warm diH2O
Bring to 500 mL diH2O
Filter Sterilize
Protocol
- Grow yeast cells to log phase in 5 mL YPD medium overnight @ 30 degrees.
- Harvest (5 min, 2000 rpm);aspirate supernatant (sterile tip).
- Wash cell pellet 1X with 1mL TE-LiOAc; transfer to eppendorph tubes.
- Resuspend in 100 µL of TE-LiOAc.
- Add (mix after each):
- 2.5µL Fresh Boiled ssDNA (10 mg/mL)
- 1µL Mini-Prep Plasmid DNA
- 800µL PEG - TE -LiOAc
- Incubate @ 30 C; 30 min. Heat Shock 42 C; ~20 minutes.
- Harvest cells (30 sec,~14000 rpm), aspirate supernatant.
- Wash pellet 1x with 1 mL of YPD.
- Resuspend in 100-250 µL of YPD. Plate onto YPD. Incubate plates 2 days at 30 C.
(Optional: plate onto YPD for 1 day and then replica-plate onto selective medium)
CDRE Optimization
Protocol
A 96 well plate was set up with 2 rows of PMC1 and VCX1 knocked out yeast cells, with the CDRE – RPF plasmid in them. Two rows below that were filled with yeast cells with no knockouts and the CDRE – RFP plasmid inserted in it. We also set aside 8 wells at the bottom as cleaning wells and filled them with ethanol.
The shocking of the cells was carried out using a coaxial electrode system, consisting of 8 sets of gold plated electrodes that fit into the 8 wells of a 96 well plate. An oscilloscope was connected in parallel to the electrode. The shocking was done at 8 V and at 20HZ frequency. The pulses were all sinusoidal.
The cells were shocked for increasing time intervals from 30 seconds to 130 seconds in ten second increments. There was also a 0 second control for every row of cells. Between each shocking the electrodes were first repeatedly dipped in the ethanol wells to clean them and then dipped in a water bath to remove any residual ethanol, then dried using Kim wipes.
After shocking the 96 well plate was put in a shaker at 37C for 8 hours. They were then imaged using a Meta 510 confocal microscope. A 60X oil objective was used and Rodamine and FIT-C filters were applied.
After re suspending any settled cells in the well being tested, 20ul of the cell solution was pipetted onto a slide and a cover slip was placed over it. Some oil was spread on the cover slip and the cells were imaged. At least 2 pictures were taken from each sample.
