"
Team:Wisconsin-Madison/safety
From 2010.igem.org
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==iGEM Questionnaire== | ==iGEM Questionnaire== | ||
1. '''Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?''' | 1. '''Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?''' | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | <br> | ||
2. '''Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?''' | 2. '''Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?''' | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | <br> | ||
3. '''Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?''' | 3. '''Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?''' | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | <br> | ||
4. '''Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?''' | 4. '''Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?''' | ||
| - | |||
| + | <br> | ||
==Encryption Project== | ==Encryption Project== | ||
Ethical Issues of a 'true' encryption device: | Ethical Issues of a 'true' encryption device: | ||
Revision as of 10:46, 18 October 2010
iGEM Questionnaire
1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?
2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?
3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
Encryption Project
Ethical Issues of a 'true' encryption device:
- recombination threat
- possible dangers with pathogens
- patenting and idea rights...can you own a gentic invention? Is it ethical to protect such an invention? How do you evaluate the dangers of new genetic inventions? By protecting a genetic invention, at what extent are we hiding the dangers of that invention?
Lab Safety
[http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/rac/guidelines_02/NIH_Gdlnes_lnk_2002z.pdf Guildlines for working with DNA recombinant molecules]
