Team:Michigan/Quorum Sensing
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m (→8/27/10) |
(→Quorum Sensing Team) |
||
Line 623: | Line 623: | ||
*ran growth curve for 16 hrs (overnight) instead of 6, drawing from Singapore protocol | *ran growth curve for 16 hrs (overnight) instead of 6, drawing from Singapore protocol | ||
Returned supernatants to ERB -20°C | Returned supernatants to ERB -20°C | ||
+ | |||
+ | == 8/28/10 == | ||
+ | ''Alex'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Obtained data from QS main experiment | ||
+ | *uploaded [[media:QS_exp_2.xls|here]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Only the wells with LB added to pellet had a significant increase in fluorescence over time. | ||
+ | *This doesn't make sense, but seems to replicate earlier results. | ||
+ | It seems that the LB blank well was contaminated slightly. This shouldn't really matter, unless the contamination was also in the other two LB wells, in which case maybe co-culture was what cause the increase in fluorescence. However, OD also only increased significantly for the LB wells, so this is probably why the fluorescence also increased. | ||
+ | This does present another experiment idea, however: maybe we can try to culture MDAI2 alone, and then in co-culture with K12 to see if there it a difference in GFP. | ||
+ | At any rate, I'm not sure it's feasible to co-culture with algae, so quorum sensing project is probably done. |
Revision as of 17:24, 28 August 2010