Team:TU Delft/17 August 2010 content
From 2010.igem.org
(→Alkane degradation) |
(→Alkane degradation) |
||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
====Ligation==== | ====Ligation==== | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Following the digestion the products were [[Team:TU_Delft/protocols/ligation|ligated]] for 15 minutes at RT: | Following the digestion the products were [[Team:TU_Delft/protocols/ligation|ligated]] for 15 minutes at RT: | ||
Line 378: | Line 184: | ||
The ligations were performed in parallel: one batch using the NEB T4 DNA ligase and buffer, the other batch the Fermentas T4 DNA ligase and buffer. We hope to be able to discern the differences in efficiency between the two (if there are any). | The ligations were performed in parallel: one batch using the NEB T4 DNA ligase and buffer, the other batch the Fermentas T4 DNA ligase and buffer. We hope to be able to discern the differences in efficiency between the two (if there are any). | ||
To test whether the ligations were succesful, i uL of ligation mix was used as template for a PCR amplification. The results will be known by tomorrow. | To test whether the ligations were succesful, i uL of ligation mix was used as template for a PCR amplification. The results will be known by tomorrow. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- |
Revision as of 11:52, 18 August 2010
Alkane degradation
Digestion
Yesterday's transformed competent cells of the 014C, 020C, 405C, 327C and 304C ligation mixes (using the BioBrick assembly method) yielded only red colonies, indicating the lack of positive colonies. It is interesting to note the presence of numerous red colonies on the digest control plate, whereas the ligation control plate (Digested pSB1C3 + ligase buffer + ligase) yielded but 1 red colony (at similar trasnsformation mix concentrations). Based on the information gathered thus far a few hypotheses were made:
Hypothesis I: The ligase buffer inhibits transformation efficiency in some way.
Hypothesis II: The ligation time of 20 mins was too short.
In order to test hypothesis I, the following mixes will be transformed into commercial competent cells:
# | Fragment 1 | Ligase buffer? | Total volume (uL) |
1 | E-pSB1C3-P (2 uL) | No | 20 |
2 | E-pSB1C3-P (2 uL) | Yes (2 uL) | 20 |
In order to test hypothesis II, a ligation kinetics assay was performed using E and P digested pSB1C3 as vector and J04450 as insert. The ligations were run for 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes.
Furthermore, a second attempt was made at creating BioBricks 014C, 020C, 405C, 327C and 304C. pSB1C3 was digested additionaly using HindIII to cut the J04450 insert as follows:
# | Sample | Enzyme 1 | Enzyme 2 | Enzyme 3 | Buffer | BSA | Needed fragment |
1 | pSB1C3 | EcoRI | PstI | HindIII | NEBuffer 3 | ✓ | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ |
The digestion mix was incubated at 37 degrees for 1 hour and at 80 degrees for 20 minutes to inactivate the restriction enzymes. The mixes were checked on 1% agarose gel:
Lane description
# | Description | Expected size (bp) | OK? |
1 | Smartladder | Varies | Yes |
2 | 011A cut | 1523, 1199, 857 | Yes |
3 | 013K cut | 1825, 1592, 1342, 43 | Yes |
4 | 017A cut | 1410, 1199, 857 | Yes |
5 | 018A cut | 1185, 872, 793, 43 | Yes |
6 | 402A cut | 1199, 857, 543 | Yes |
7 | 403A cut | 1185, 872, 397, 43 | Yes |
8 | pCaiF in pANY cut | 1277, 1143, 74 | Yes |
9 | B0032 in pSB1A2 cut | 1185, 872, 35 | Yes |
10 | B0032 in pSB1A2 cut | 1185, 872, 35 | Yes |
11 | pAlkS cut | 1272, 1138, 106 | Yes |
12 | pSB1C3 cut | 2035, 1081 | Yes (However incomplete digestion, see 3116 bp) |
15 | BioRad EZ Load Marker | Varies | Yes |
Ligation
Following the digestion the products were ligated for 15 minutes at RT:
# | BioBrick | Fragment 1 | Fragment 2 | Destination Vector |
1 | 014C | ‘E - J23100-X-J61100-alkB2-J61100-rubA3 - S’ | ‘X - J61100-rubA4-J61100-rubR-B0015 - P’ | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ |
2 | 020C | ‘E - J23100-X-J61100-ladA - S’ | ‘X - J61101-ADH - P’ | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ |
3 | 405C | ‘E - J23100-X-J61101-PhPFDα - S’ | ‘X - J61101-PhPFDβ - P’ | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ |
4 | 327C | ‘E - pCaiF - S’ | ‘X - B0032 - P’ | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ |
5 | 304C | ‘E - pAlkS - S’ | ‘X - B0032 - P’ | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ |
6 | Ligation control | None | None | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ |
7 | 014C | ‘E - J23100-X-J61100-alkB2-J61100-rubA3 - S’ | ‘X - J61100-rubA4-J61100-rubR-B0015 - P’ | ‘E - pSB1C3 - P’ (Pre-shipped linearized plasmid) |
The ligations were performed in parallel: one batch using the NEB T4 DNA ligase and buffer, the other batch the Fermentas T4 DNA ligase and buffer. We hope to be able to discern the differences in efficiency between the two (if there are any). To test whether the ligations were succesful, i uL of ligation mix was used as template for a PCR amplification. The results will be known by tomorrow.