Team:Harvard/human practices/debate
From 2010.igem.org
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
- | + | <div id="abstract"> | |
- | < | + | <h1>the debate</h1> |
- | + | </div> | |
<div id="tabs" style="width:600px"> | <div id="tabs" style="width:600px"> |
Revision as of 00:04, 22 July 2010
the debate
Along with environmental activism, food awareness has recently come to prominence. Books such as The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan and movies such as Food, Inc. call upon the public to take greater ownership over what we consume. One of the major issues in food awareness that sometimes slips under the radar is that of genetically modified foods. The main argument for creating and growing genetically modified crops is the great potential they have as solutions for such problems such as world hunger, nutrient deficiency, resource managment, and pesticide avoidance. Despite this high potential, it is important to be wary of progress and stress safety in any creation of a new entity. Among the opponents of genetic modification of crops, many of the arguments revolve around wariness of the risks of gmo's. Below, we've outlined some of the major arguments made against the safety of gmo's, and the rebuttals made by the GE community.