Team:Harvard/human practices/debate

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 34: Line 34:
         <li><a href="#consumers"><span>consumer choice</span></a></li>
         <li><a href="#consumers"><span>consumer choice</span></a></li>
     </ul>
     </ul>
-
     <div id="intro">Mauris mauris ante, blandit et, ultrices a, suscipit eget, quam. Integer ut neque. Vivamus nisi metus, molestie vel, gravida in, condimentum sit amet, nunc. Nam a nibh. Donec suscipit eros. Nam mi. Proin viverra leo ut odio. Curabitur malesuada. Vestibulum a velit eu ante scelerisque vulputate. </div>
+
 
 +
     <div id="intro"><p> Along with environmental activism, food awareness has recently come to prominence. Books such as The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan and movies such as Food, Inc. call upon the public to take greater ownership over what we consume. One of the major issues in food awareness that sometimes slips under the radar is that of genetically modified foods. The main argument for creating and growing genetically modified crops is the great potential they have as solutions for such problems such as world hunger, nutrient deficiency, resource managment, and pesticide avoidance. Despite this high potential, it is important to be wary of progress and stress safety in any creation of a new entity. Among the opponents of genetic modification of crops, many of the arguments revolve around wariness of the risks of gmo's. Below, we've outlined some of the major arguments made against the safety of gmo's, and the rebuttals made by the GE community. </p></div>
 +
 
     <div id="procon">pro vs. con</div>
     <div id="procon">pro vs. con</div>
     <div id="media">media media media </div>
     <div id="media">media media media </div>
Line 45: Line 47:
-
 
+
<!--
<div id="accordion" style="width:600px">
<div id="accordion" style="width:600px">
<h3><a href="#">debate in brief</a></h3>
<h3><a href="#">debate in brief</a></h3>
Line 138: Line 140:
-
<p> Along with environmental activism, food awareness has recently come to prominence. Books such as The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan and movies such as Food, Inc. call upon the public to take greater ownership over what we consume. One of the major issues in food awareness that sometimes slips under the radar is that of genetically modified foods. The main argument for creating and growing genetically modified crops is the great potential they have as solutions for such problems such as world hunger, nutrient deficiency, resource managment, and pesticide avoidance. Despite this high potential, it is important to be wary of progress and stress safety in any creation of a new entity. Among the opponents of genetic modification of crops, many of the arguments revolve around wariness of the risks of gmo's. Below, we've outlined some of the major arguments made against the safety of gmo's, and the rebuttals made by the GE community. <hr/></p>
 
 +
-->
</div>
</div>
</html>
</html>

Revision as of 23:52, 21 July 2010




the debate

Along with environmental activism, food awareness has recently come to prominence. Books such as The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan and movies such as Food, Inc. call upon the public to take greater ownership over what we consume. One of the major issues in food awareness that sometimes slips under the radar is that of genetically modified foods. The main argument for creating and growing genetically modified crops is the great potential they have as solutions for such problems such as world hunger, nutrient deficiency, resource managment, and pesticide avoidance. Despite this high potential, it is important to be wary of progress and stress safety in any creation of a new entity. Among the opponents of genetic modification of crops, many of the arguments revolve around wariness of the risks of gmo's. Below, we've outlined some of the major arguments made against the safety of gmo's, and the rebuttals made by the GE community.

pro vs. con
media media media
science science science
business business business
activism actiadfj ;ljk
policy policy policy
consumer choice