Team:UC Davis/notebook/c0051debug.html
From 2010.igem.org
Skatercomet (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
- | <font size="1">Our scanned image of our plate with colonies containing RBS-C0051 ligated to RBS-RFP. Click above for the full-screen image.</size> | + | <font size="1">Our scanned image of our plate with colonies containing RBS-C0051 ligated to RBS-RFP-F1610. Click above for the full-screen image.</size> |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li>Our intermediate ligation of RBS-C0051 to RBS-RFP produced a red phenotype but it has no promoter! </li> | + | <li>Our intermediate ligation of RBS-C0051 to RBS-RFP-F1610 produced a red phenotype but it has no promoter! </li> |
<li>Since Bba_C0051 is a highly studied and widely used part in the registry, it presents a huge problem not only in the context of the spatial oscillator but also in the 76 parts that utilize it throughout the registry.</li> | <li>Since Bba_C0051 is a highly studied and widely used part in the registry, it presents a huge problem not only in the context of the spatial oscillator but also in the 76 parts that utilize it throughout the registry.</li> | ||
<li>This exciting new find causes many problems in our design and must cause malfunctions in a huge number of parts entered and used in the registry. </li> | <li>This exciting new find causes many problems in our design and must cause malfunctions in a huge number of parts entered and used in the registry. </li> | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li>We began by sequencing the DNA of the red colonies from the ligation of RBS-C0051 to RBS-RFP in order to rule out the presence of any promoter or mutation. The sequence analysis revealed that we did indeed have the correct sequence. <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/sequences/C0051LV.html" class="help">Results of our C0051 w/ LVA tag sequence.</a>.</li> | + | <li>We began by sequencing the DNA of the red colonies from the ligation of RBS-C0051 to RBS-RFP-F1610 in order to rule out the presence of any promoter or mutation. The sequence analysis revealed that we did indeed have the correct sequence. <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/sequences/C0051LV.html" class="help">Results of our C0051 w/ LVA tag sequence.</a>.</li> |
<li>Further investigation into Bba_C0051 showed that the part not only contained the coding region, cI, but it is also followed by an LVA degradation tag and a barcode. When looking further into the RBS (Bba_E1010), we found that it also contained an LVA degradation tag and a barcode after the RFP coding region. </li> | <li>Further investigation into Bba_C0051 showed that the part not only contained the coding region, cI, but it is also followed by an LVA degradation tag and a barcode. When looking further into the RBS (Bba_E1010), we found that it also contained an LVA degradation tag and a barcode after the RFP coding region. </li> | ||
<li>We then conducted a number of experiments in order to determine which part or combination of parts contained in the construct caused this unwanted promoter-like behavior.</li> | <li>We then conducted a number of experiments in order to determine which part or combination of parts contained in the construct caused this unwanted promoter-like behavior.</li> |
Revision as of 00:04, 28 October 2010
|
|
|