Team:Stanford/Research

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 75: Line 75:
#Response time
#Response time
-->
-->
 +
 +
==Biosafety==
 +
<table border="0">
 +
<tr>
 +
<td valign=Top bgcolor="#FFFF99">
 +
  <ol>
 +
    <li><strong>Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
 +
      </strong>
 +
      <ul>
 +
        <li> researcher safety, </li>
 +
        <li> public safety, or </li>
 +
        <li> environmental safety? </li>
 +
      </ul>
 +
    </li>
 +
    <li><strong> Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
 +
      </strong>
 +
      <ul>
 +
        <li> did you document these issues in the Registry? </li>
 +
        <li> how did you manage to handle the safety issue? </li>
 +
        <li> How could other teams learn from your experience? </li>
 +
      </ul>
 +
      </li>
 +
    <li><strong>Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? </strong>
 +
        <ul>
 +
            <li> If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? </li>
 +
            <li> If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country? </li>
 +
        </ul>
 +
    </li>
 +
    <li><strong>Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </strong></li>
 +
    </ol></td>
 +
  <td><p>&nbsp;</p>    </td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
==Research==
==Research==

Revision as of 23:04, 27 October 2010

Home Project Applications Modeling Parts Team Notebook Twitter

Contents

Why Ratios?

Ratios rule the biological world, and controlling them will unlock a vast range of applications for synthetic biology.
In electrical and mechanical engineering, computers can be used to calculate a ratio from precise measurements, but biological engineering doesn't have that luxury. We need a hardwired device to compute and act on ratios independent of a controlling computer or human researcher.

The Stanford team's ratio sensors use biological machinery to eliminate the human component from ratio computation. Our output system is more efficient than two individual sensors and, most importantly, can pass its results on to other parts and devices. A ratio sensor performs a calculation that a user doesn't need to/won't be able to. A ratio sensor frees up a wavelength channel on the measurement device, and, more importantly for the future, allows the computed ratio to be passed on to another part. A useful ratio sensor that could be utilized in a broad regime of biological applications needs to be operable and accurate in micro-environments; the Stanford team's ratio sensor is engineered to function within E. Coli, which is fully operable over a range of environments.

Our Project: Two Designs for Ratio Detection

Our team decided to pursue two different systems for detecting ratios. After considering the scenarios in which biological engineers would want to use ratio sensors, having two specialized sensors seemed to allow greater flexibility of usage than a single design.

While both systems receive two input signals, the output they give is different, allowing them be applied in different situations. Here's a brief rundown of the two designs (you can see more by clicking through to the individual project pages).

The First Design:

Method: Small RNA Interference

Output: One of two possible proteins, depending on whether the ratio of input chemicals lies above or below a predetermined threshold

Useful: For reporting on a situation with a boolean output: disease detection, preterm labor warning, cancer metastasis warning

The Second Design:

Method: Kinase/Phosphatase Regulation of a Transcription Factor

Output: One output protein whose concentration is linearly dependent on the ratio of the input chemicals

Useful: For acting in a situation requiring a graded response: drug delivery, metabolic flux control, detailed ratiometric reporting

Both sensors are:

  • Modular: input and output molecules can be changed without affecting the interior mechanism of the device
  • Orthogonal: device mechanisms are not found in E. coli, avoid crosstalk with host cell


Biosafety

  1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
    • researcher safety,
    • public safety, or
    • environmental safety?
  2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
    • did you document these issues in the Registry?
    • how did you manage to handle the safety issue?
    • How could other teams learn from your experience?
  3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
    • If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
    • If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
  4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

 


Research


Medal Requirements

Bronze Medal

  1. Register the team, have a great summer, and have fun attending the Jamboree.
    Done!
  2. Successfully complete and submit a Project Summary form.
    Done!
  3. Create and share a Description of the team's project via the iGEM wiki
    Done!
  4. Present a Poster and Talk at the iGEM Jamboree
    Booked our plane tickets!
  5. Enter information detailing at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device in the Registry of Parts
    [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K353002 Done!]
  6. Entered information for each new part or device should at least include primary nucleic acid sequence, description of function, authorship, any relevant safety notes, and an acknowledgement of sources and references.
    [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K353002 Done!]
  7. Submit DNA for at least one new BioBrick Part or Device to the Registry of Parts.
    Done!

Silver Medal

  1. Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.
    Here are some preliminary results
  2. Characterize the operation of at least one new BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information on the Parts or Device page via the Registry of Parts
    Here are some preliminary results

Gold Medal

  1. Characterize or improve an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information back on the Registry.
    When sequencing one of our ligations, we noticed an unexpected sequence in our results. After more investigation, we determined that that sequence came from the Distribution part [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_E1010 BBa_E1010], and that the part sequence listed on the Parts Registry was incomplete. We have notified the Registry and made a note of this discovery on the E1010 parts experience page.
  2. Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
    With our Twitter project, we hope to help all iGEM teams by facilitating collaboration between teams. Read more about it here!




Retrieved from "http://2010.igem.org/Team:Stanford/Research"