From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| Line 44: |
Line 44: |
| | <tr> | | <tr> |
| | <td> | | <td> |
| - | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/7/77/RBS_C0051_RBS_RFP_F1610.png" width="245px" height="245px"> | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/7/77/RBS_C0051_RBS_RFP_F1610.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/7/77/RBS_C0051_RBS_RFP_F1610.png" width="245px" height="245px" ></a> |
| | </td> | | </td> |
| | </tr> | | </tr> |
| | <tr> | | <tr> |
| | <td> | | <td> |
| - | Text here
| + | Our scanned image of our plate with colonies containing RBS-C0051 ligated to RBS-RFP. Click above for the full-screen image. |
| | </td> | | </td> |
| | </tr> | | </tr> |
Revision as of 10:23, 27 October 2010
|
|
|
|
Bba_C0051 cI-Lamba, the promoter in disguise
During the construction of one of our larger pieces of the spatial oscillator, the ON switch, we stumbled upon an unexpected phenotype.
 |
|
|
Our scanned image of our plate with colonies containing RBS-C0051 ligated to RBS-RFP. Click above for the full-screen image.
|
|
|
- Our intermediate ligation of RBS-C0051 to RBS-RFP produced a red phenotype but it has no promoter!
- Since Bba_C0051 is a highly studied and widely used part in the registry, it presents a huge problem not only in the context of the spatial oscillator but also in the 76 parts that utilize it throughout the registry.
- This exciting new find causes many problems in our design and must cause malfunctions in a huge number of parts entered and used in the registry.
|
- We began by sequencing the DNA of the red colonies from the ligation of RBS-C0051 to RBS-RFP in order to rule out the presence of any promoter or mutation. The sequence analysis revealed that we did indeed have the correct sequence.
- Further investigation into Bba_C0051 showed that the part not only contained the coding region, cI, but it is also followed by an LVA degradation tag and a barcode. When looking further into the RBS (Bba_E1010), we found that it also contained an LVA degradation tag and a barcode after the RFP coding region.
- We then conducted a number of experiments in order to determine which part or combination of parts contained in the construct caused this unwanted promoter-like behavior.
- After determining the cause of the unwanted transcription, we continued to conduct a number of experiments in order to measure the results.
|
|
|
|
- We ligated RBS-RFP to RBS-RFP to see if transcription occurred.
- The construct exhibited a white phenotype. Thus, we concluded that transcription didn't start in any part of the RFP
|
|
|
- We ligated RBS-RFP to Chris Anderson's Promoter Screening Plasmid.
- We also obtained white colonies.
|
|
|
- We ligated RBS-C0051 to Chris Anderson's Promoter Screening Plasmid.
- And we have obtained red colonies! We know that the transcription initiation is somewhere in the BBa_C0051 region.
|
|
|
- To determine where transcription is initiating, we have decided to perform 5' Race PCR on select regions of c0051
|
 |
 |
- Surely enough, after ligating the C0051 without the barcode into the Chris Anderson promoter screening plasmid, we have obtained white colonies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|---|
|
We would like to take a moment to thank all of our sponsors for their very generous donations, as we could not have done this without your help!
We would also like to thank and acknowledge:
Our Advisors
Marc Facciotti
Ilias Tagkopoulos
Technical Guidance
David Larsen
Andrew Yao
Visiting iGEMer
Jia Li of Zhejiang University (TEAM ZJU-China)
cI Promoter Screen
Drew Endy - Stanford
Thomas Schneider - NIH
Want to sponsor us? Send an email to mtfacciotti@ucdavis.edu to discuss various ways you can help! :)
|
|
|
"
