"
Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/safety
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<div align="left"> | <div align="left"> | ||
| + | <br><br> | ||
| + | |||
| Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| - | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/1/18/Safety_coli.png"> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/1/18/Safety_coli.png" style="width:400px;"> |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 07:18, 27 October 2010
1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?
Our project worked with biosafty level 1 or 2 host organism. Then, our ideas don’t raise any safty issues.2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?
No, they don’t. We used genes analysed in peer-reviewed papers.3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
Yes, there is. There is the commitee of Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology , and we followed their safety guidelines and regulations.4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions?
To share the information about the experience of potentially serious errors in our experiment is important. When we share that, we can be aware of and attend to risk factors in our experiment. Moreover, that leads to prevention of happning and erros. In acctuary, we reported about potentially serious errors each other per week.
