Team:Baltimore US/OctGroupNotebook
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: center {| style="color:#1b2c8a;background-color:#7998AD;" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="0" bordercolor="#fff" width="924px" align="center" !alig...) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
!align="center"|[[Team:Baltimore_US/Safety|Safety]] | !align="center"|[[Team:Baltimore_US/Safety|Safety]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
- | |||
- | |||
{| style= "background-color:#FFFFF;" width="924px" align="center" | {| style= "background-color:#FFFFF;" width="924px" align="center" | ||
Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
== Group Notebook for October 2010 == | == Group Notebook for October 2010 == | ||
+ | __TOC__ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 26 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Day before the freeze/deadline and we still cannot confirm the product's success or failure <br> | ||
+ | through the colony PCR. We can thus not send out the product until after the due date, and thus <br> | ||
+ | we will not be able to actually compete for a medal or anything. We do, however, still intend to <br> | ||
+ | finish our part and submit it to the registry, as well as attending the Jamboree with our information <br> | ||
+ | and present our work to anyone interested. On the bright side, we do have the Do it yourself <br> | ||
+ | Electrophoresis kit that Miles has been working on, and we can easily show that as well as <br> | ||
+ | our part Project. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 25 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Colony PCR gave no results for the product, but the positive control gave no results as well. <br> | ||
+ | We're too close to the wiki freeze deadline to be able to redo the colony PCR and still have <br> | ||
+ | everything else done in preparation of getting our product sequenced in time for shipment. <br> | ||
+ | The team decided to move forward and ship part <br> | ||
+ | not sequenced and do the sequencing the week before the jamboree then update <br> | ||
+ | the wiki after we return when it becomes unfrozen. <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 22 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | |||
+ | Patched colonies to LB & Amp, resuspended in 50 ul diH20 for colony pcr <br> | ||
+ | Used 5 ul of pooled colonies & 5 ul of 10 to the -1 dilution in separate rxns. <br> | ||
+ | 2-5 ul Taq genomic DNA as a control <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 21 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | |||
+ | Digest of ligation rxns incubating for 2 hours @ 37 degrees C <br> | ||
+ | Robert & Bernadette completed site directed mutation using the Stratagene protocol <br> | ||
+ | 3 rxns containing : 7.8 ul Reverse Mechanism, 7.4 ul Forward Mechanism | ||
+ | 5 ul DNA, 5 ul Pfu turbo buffer, 1 ul dNTP, 1 ul Pfu turbo, 11.8 ul diH20 <br> | ||
+ | Added 1 ul DpNI to pcr rxns incubated at 37 degrees C for 1.5 hrs <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Transform NEB-10 lamba cells with 5 ul of PCR/DpNI rxn. Select on Amp. 75 ug/ml <br> | ||
+ | Incubated on ice, heat shock & plated <br> | ||
+ | Got colonies from transformation <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Lab_notes.JPG|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Pcr.JPG|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 20 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Bernadette weighed tubes and material to purify. 2 combined samples Plasmid psB1C3 weighed .4 <br> | ||
+ | Taq sample weight .16. Used Q1 Aquick Gel Extraction kit to purify. <br> | ||
+ | Electrophoresis on purifications against 1 kb ladder. <br> | ||
+ | Ligation reactions completed with a no Taq control and a no enzyme control <br> | ||
+ | 4 ul plasmid, 4 ul Taq, 1 ul buffer, 1 ul enzyme. No taq control also included 4 ul diH20 <br> | ||
+ | No enzyme control had 1 ul diH20. Incubated at 16 degrees C overnight <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 19 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Bernadette completed digests. Promoter R0010 cut with EcoRI 1 ul and SpeI 1 ul <br> | ||
+ | Buffer 4 5 ul, 10 ul DNA, 5 ul BSA (diluted 1:10) and 28 ul diH20. Also ran an uncut sample <br> | ||
+ | with 30 ul diH20. | ||
+ | RBS B0034 cut with XbaI 1ul and PstI 1 ul also had uncut sample <br> | ||
+ | Plasmid pSB1C3 and J04455 cut with EcoRI 1ul and PstI 1 ul also with uncut control <br> | ||
+ | Ran gel and cut out plasmid and Taq to purify <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 18 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Prepared plasmid mini prep B0015 tt, B0034 RBS, R0010 lacI promoter. Grew up cells <br> | ||
+ | harvested parts. Used quick lysis kit. <br> | ||
+ | Innoculated Taq into vector 5 ul LB media, 5 ul chlorophenocol resistant plasmid B0012 <br> | ||
+ | and B0011. 15 ul tetracycline, 25 ul kanamycin <br> | ||
+ | [[Image:Timeline.JPG|900px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 14 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Robert was testing our product from overlap against pcr conditions and possible errors. <br> | ||
+ | Our last 4 gel electrophoresis of pcrs have raised some concerns about whether our new POLI <br> | ||
+ | pstI site template is what it should be and if our primers are still good with it. <br> | ||
+ | First thing we have done today "Blast" the primers against the original POLI template <br> | ||
+ | to check for possible binding sites. There are a few around locations that could cause problems but <br> | ||
+ | they are not closer than 100 bp to the single base mutation we made - thus shouldn't account <br> | ||
+ | for the differences. Looking back at the recent pcrs, a temperature gradient hasn't been employed <br> | ||
+ | against the new template yet, and we may need higher stringency in our new, bred template. <br> | ||
+ | Robert set up pcr reaction for 5 reactions with varying annealing temperatures <br> | ||
+ | to compare against the TAQ genomic POLI gene <br> | ||
+ | Test 1 @ 58 degrees C, Test 2 60 degrees, Test 3 62 degrees, Test 4 64 degrees, Test 5 66 degrees <br> | ||
+ | Results of our overlap had given us something of the right size, but not our product or the POLI <br> | ||
+ | gene anymore. As the Overlap PCR has given no good results after seven attempts, and the seventh was <br> | ||
+ | a counterfeit of the right size just to make it difficult to tell if the Overlap was successful, we <br> | ||
+ | will be attempting a different approach. In order to make sure that we have something to submit, even <br> | ||
+ | if not our intended product, we will be working on placing a POLI gene with the BB-prefix and suffix <br> | ||
+ | in the required plasmid as well as trying a new method for the single base mutation. The new method <br> | ||
+ | mimics a kit (Stratagene) designed to be used while a gene is in a plamid already. This procedure first <br> | ||
+ | copies the whole plasmid on the inside and outside (with the mutation from the primer) and then uses dpnI <br> | ||
+ | to remove the methylated original plamid, leaving only the intended product already in the plasmid.<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Modified template vs. Genomic in same reaction: <br> | ||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/8/8e/YETAnotherFineMess_10-14-10.jpg | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 13 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | results for POLI - PSTI: <br> | ||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9c/AnotherFineMess_10-13-10.jpg | ||
+ | odd... <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 12 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Robert ran another pcr with 2 tests: diH20 25.5 ul, buffer 10 ul, dNTP 1 ul, DMSO 2.5, Fwd primer 2.5 <br> | ||
+ | Rv primer 2.5 ul, Pol I 5 ul, PFU 1 ul. The second test was the same except 10ul POLI and 20.5 ul diH20 <br> | ||
+ | pcr ran with an annealing temp of 58.5 degrees C. <br> | ||
+ | [[Image:Taq_test_2010-10-12.jpg]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | got good results, ran PCR with POLI - PSTI. <br> | ||
+ | Bernadette ran a gel on Promoter, Double Terminator and RBS digests cut and uncut. <br> | ||
+ | RBS and Double Terminator looked fine. Bernadette cut out from gel - will redo Promoter. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Robert.JPG|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 11 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Robert's pcr gel was blank except for the control lane - He'll rerun tomorrow <br> | ||
+ | Bernadette did RBS digest w/ 15 ul DNA, XbaI 1 ul, PstI 1 ul, BSA .5, Buffer 4 @ 5 ul, diH20 27.5. Also <br> | ||
+ | an uncut control with 29.5 ul diH20. Promoter digest was identical except used SpeI 1 ul and Pst I 1 ul -<br> | ||
+ | Also an uncut control. Double terminator Digest the same except EcoRI 1 ul and XbaI 1 ul w/uncut control. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 7 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Bernadette & Robert <br> | ||
+ | Gel results were not what was expected for amplification, but the product is good after gel purification <br> | ||
+ | Robert tested PCR w/ original TAQ to get optimal conditions. Tested different gradients of DMSO/temps. <br> | ||
+ | Bernadette ran gel on double term, RBS & Promoter <br> | ||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/a3/Product_amplification_attempt.jpg | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Oct 6 === | ||
+ | @ Burkett Lab | ||
+ | Robert's gel results from pcr (58 degrees C, 2.5% DMSO & 61 degrees, 2.5% DMSO) yield results that match <br> | ||
+ | TAQ poli in size. Part extracted & purified. Next..Amplification through cloning into a cell and PCR <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/cd/Overlap_7_vs_TAQ_original.jpg | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 22:05, 26 October 2010
Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Notebook | Meeting/Lab Times This Week | Safety |
---|