Team:EPF Lausanne/Project droso
From 2010.igem.org
(→Experiments on Drosophilia) |
(→Introduction) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
We chose to work with asaia because it could survive in mosquitos. Due to technical issues, we wanted to work in a first phase with a possible substitute to mosquitoes, namely drosophila. We therefore decided to work with two different hosts, first drosophila, which we discuss in the first part of this section, and then mosquitos, which we discuss in the last part of this section. | We chose to work with asaia because it could survive in mosquitos. Due to technical issues, we wanted to work in a first phase with a possible substitute to mosquitoes, namely drosophila. We therefore decided to work with two different hosts, first drosophila, which we discuss in the first part of this section, and then mosquitos, which we discuss in the last part of this section. | ||
- | + | = I) Experiments on Drosophila = | |
The final goal of our project is for our modified Asaia to survive and produce proteins in the mosquito's gut. Working with mosquitoes however, requires special equipment that we do not have at EPFL. We wondered if we could work on another insect which is less demanding, and therefore turned towards Drosophila (commonly known as the fruit fly), which is much easier to work with. | The final goal of our project is for our modified Asaia to survive and produce proteins in the mosquito's gut. Working with mosquitoes however, requires special equipment that we do not have at EPFL. We wondered if we could work on another insect which is less demanding, and therefore turned towards Drosophila (commonly known as the fruit fly), which is much easier to work with. | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
(See [https://2010.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:EPF_Lausanne/Project/Materials_Methods_Drosophila Materials and Methods] for details on how the experiments were conducted.) | (See [https://2010.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:EPF_Lausanne/Project/Materials_Methods_Drosophila Materials and Methods] for details on how the experiments were conducted.) | ||
- | + | == Our main results == | |
[[Image:Asaiaflies.png|center|600px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 1'''Observing Asaia that express GFP in vivo]] | [[Image:Asaiaflies.png|center|600px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 1'''Observing Asaia that express GFP in vivo]] | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
- | + | ===1) Asaia is not toxic for Drosophila=== | |
[[Image:Survival.png|center|600px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 2''' Asaia is not toxic to Drosophila. Relish (A) and Oregon (B) flies were infected with different bacterial strains and monitored them over time. Deaths were counted and added up over the course of the experiment.]] | [[Image:Survival.png|center|600px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 2''' Asaia is not toxic to Drosophila. Relish (A) and Oregon (B) flies were infected with different bacterial strains and monitored them over time. Deaths were counted and added up over the course of the experiment.]] | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
We found that Asaia does not cause significantly more deaths than the non-pathogenic bacteria or in the uninfected control (Figure 2). | We found that Asaia does not cause significantly more deaths than the non-pathogenic bacteria or in the uninfected control (Figure 2). | ||
- | + | ===2) Asaia is not persistant in Drosophila === | |
[[Image:Persistance.png|center|400px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 3''' Asaia does not persist in Drosophila.]] | [[Image:Persistance.png|center|400px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 3''' Asaia does not persist in Drosophila.]] | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
To do this we disinfected the exterior of the flies by washing them with ethanol (for less than five seconds) and then rinsing them with water. The flies were then crushed in the medium corresponding to the bacteria we were interested in (i.e: Gly for asaia, LB for Pe, etc). We then did a serial dilution eleven times with a factor of ten with the crushed flies, and plated each dilution with antibiotics to specifically select the bacteria we were interested in. | To do this we disinfected the exterior of the flies by washing them with ethanol (for less than five seconds) and then rinsing them with water. The flies were then crushed in the medium corresponding to the bacteria we were interested in (i.e: Gly for asaia, LB for Pe, etc). We then did a serial dilution eleven times with a factor of ten with the crushed flies, and plated each dilution with antibiotics to specifically select the bacteria we were interested in. | ||
- | + | ==Conclusion to the drosophila experiments== | |
The survival assay reveals that Asaia is not lethal for Drosophila. | The survival assay reveals that Asaia is not lethal for Drosophila. | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
As mentioned before, bacteria that live in insects’ gut are not common and it is possible that because it cannot survive in Drosophila, it is actually very specific to mosquitoes. With this assumption, we could assume that we can introduce our modified asaia into the wildlife with very little risk of it spreading to other insects. | As mentioned before, bacteria that live in insects’ gut are not common and it is possible that because it cannot survive in Drosophila, it is actually very specific to mosquitoes. With this assumption, we could assume that we can introduce our modified asaia into the wildlife with very little risk of it spreading to other insects. | ||
- | + | = II) Experiments on mosquitos = | |
{{EPFL_2010_bottom_wrap}} | {{EPFL_2010_bottom_wrap}} | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 14:55, 26 October 2010
Contents |
Introduction
We chose to work with asaia because it could survive in mosquitos. Due to technical issues, we wanted to work in a first phase with a possible substitute to mosquitoes, namely drosophila. We therefore decided to work with two different hosts, first drosophila, which we discuss in the first part of this section, and then mosquitos, which we discuss in the last part of this section.
I) Experiments on Drosophila
The final goal of our project is for our modified Asaia to survive and produce proteins in the mosquito's gut. Working with mosquitoes however, requires special equipment that we do not have at EPFL. We wondered if we could work on another insect which is less demanding, and therefore turned towards Drosophila (commonly known as the fruit fly), which is much easier to work with.
Considering the fact that bacteria that live in the guts of insects are not very common, we assumed that there was a fair chance that Asaia could persist in Drosophila and that we could use the it as an alternative to mosquitoes for our basic experiments.
Using Drosophila melanogaster we aimed to address two questions:
i. Is Asaia toxic for Drosophila?
ii.Is Asaia able to colonize the Drosophila gut and persist?
(See Materials and Methods for details on how the experiments were conducted.)
Our main results
1) Asaia is not toxic for Drosophila
We infected Drosophila with different bacterial strains, a pathogenic control starin (P. entomophila), a non-pathogenic control strain (Ecc 15) and our Asaia bacteria. For these experiments we used two different fly strains (Oregon and Relish).
We found that Asaia does not cause significantly more deaths than the non-pathogenic bacteria or in the uninfected control (Figure 2).
2) Asaia is not persistant in Drosophila
With this last experiment we wanted to ascertain wether asaia persisted in drosophila and quantize how many asaia were present in the drosophila’s gut after 3h, 24h and 48h.
To be able to “count” the number of asaia at these three different periods of time, we had to retrieve the bacteria inside the flies, plate them and after incubation count the number of colonies present.
To do this we disinfected the exterior of the flies by washing them with ethanol (for less than five seconds) and then rinsing them with water. The flies were then crushed in the medium corresponding to the bacteria we were interested in (i.e: Gly for asaia, LB for Pe, etc). We then did a serial dilution eleven times with a factor of ten with the crushed flies, and plated each dilution with antibiotics to specifically select the bacteria we were interested in.
Conclusion to the drosophila experiments
The survival assay reveals that Asaia is not lethal for Drosophila.
The persistence assay showed that Asaia is unable to establish itself in the fruit fly's gut. This prevents us to use Drosophila as a substitute to mosquitoes.
As mentioned before, bacteria that live in insects’ gut are not common and it is possible that because it cannot survive in Drosophila, it is actually very specific to mosquitoes. With this assumption, we could assume that we can introduce our modified asaia into the wildlife with very little risk of it spreading to other insects.
II) Experiments on mosquitos