Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Material Methods/Measurements/Tecan/test28settembre
From 2010.igem.org
m (→RESULTS) |
|||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
[[Image:UNIPV_Pavia_GFP28settembre.png|thumb|500px |center|Raw GFP curve]] | [[Image:UNIPV_Pavia_GFP28settembre.png|thumb|500px |center|Raw GFP curve]] | ||
- | [[Image:UNIPV10 SScellM28settembre.png|thumb|500px |center|Mean of (dGFP/dt)/O.D.600 (under the hypothesis that GFP half-life in fusion contructs is similar to the original one -<partinfo>BBa_E0040</partinfo>)]] | + | [[Image:UNIPV10 SScellM28settembre.png|thumb|500px |center|Mean of (dGFP/dt)/O.D.600 (under the hypothesis that GFP half-life in fusion contructs is similar to the original one - <partinfo>BBa_E0040</partinfo>)]] |
All cell cultures showed a similar growth curve and doubling time was computed as described [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts/Characterization#Doubling_time_evaluation|here]] in order to have informations about the burden due to synthesis of such fusion proteins. It's possible to see that all doubling time are very similar except for induced cultures. In this case doubling time is much higher than posite control and not induced cultures; so it's possible to assert that in this case there's a kind of metabolic burden higher than in the others, maybe because of the inducible system. | All cell cultures showed a similar growth curve and doubling time was computed as described [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts/Characterization#Doubling_time_evaluation|here]] in order to have informations about the burden due to synthesis of such fusion proteins. It's possible to see that all doubling time are very similar except for induced cultures. In this case doubling time is much higher than posite control and not induced cultures; so it's possible to assert that in this case there's a kind of metabolic burden higher than in the others, maybe because of the inducible system. |
Revision as of 13:28, 26 October 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|