Team:SDU-Denmark/labnotes8

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→PCR on pKJ606 with PSfw and PSrv primers)
(→Lab notes (8/30 - 9/5))
 
(13 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
__TOC__
__TOC__
 +
 +
== Flagella ==
 +
<br>
 +
Since the previous FlhDCmut was wrongly mutated due to incorrect mutation primers, we are now back to square one with new correct primers. The next weeks the flagella-group are working according to the following plan: <br>
 +
1) Miniprep of plasmids with "wrong" FlhDCmut <br><br>
 +
2) Two-step PCR to get mutatet FlhDC<br>
 +
3) Cut and Ligate into pSB1C3 and pSB1AK3 and transform into TOP10 cells <br>
 +
4) Send to sequencing <br>
 +
5) Characterize biobrick <br><br>
 +
=== Miniprep of "wrong" FlhDCmut ===
 +
<br>
 +
''Done by:'' Louise <br>
 +
''Date:'' September 3rd <br>
 +
''Protocol:'' [[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#MP1.2 MP1.2]] <br>
 +
''Notes:'' <br>
 +
No changes of protocol were made. <br>
 +
''Results:''
 +
Nanodrop after sample was dried down: <br>
 +
'''Sample 1:''' Concentration: 192ng/ul Purity: 1.96/1.90 <br>
 +
'''Sample 2:''' Concentration: 200ng/ul Purity: 1.84/1.88 <br><br>
 +
The samples were run on a 1.5% gel with a 10kb ladder. The bands are positioned between 1500bp and 1200bp. FlhDCmut in pSB1C3 is 1248bp. <br>
 +
[[Image:Team SDU-Denmark Miniprep af flhDCmut i 1C3.jpg|300px]]
 +
----
 +
== Photosensor ==
== Photosensor ==
=== PCR on pKJ606 with PSfw and VR primers ===
=== PCR on pKJ606 with PSfw and VR primers ===
Line 246: Line 270:
<br>
<br>
Results: Primers were confirmed working, the next step will be PFU pcr.<br>
Results: Primers were confirmed working, the next step will be PFU pcr.<br>
-
=== Flagella ===
 
-
<br>
 
-
Since the previous FlhDCmut was wrongly mutated due to incorrect mutation primers, we are now back to square one with new correct primers. The next weeks the flagella-group are working according to the following plan: <br>
 
-
1) Miniprep of plasmids with "wrong" FlhDCmut <br><br>
 
-
2) Two-step PCR to get mutatet FlhDC<br>
 
-
3) Cut and Ligate into pSB1C3 and pSB1AK3 and transform into TOP10 cells <br>
 
-
4) Send to sequencing <br>
 
-
5) Characterize biobrick <br><br>
 
-
==== Miniprep of "wrong" FlhDCmut ====
 
-
<br>
 
-
''Done by:'' Louise <br>
 
-
''Date:'' September 3rd <br>
 
-
''Protocol:'' [[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#MP1.2 MP1.2]] <br>
 
-
''Notes:'' <br>
 
-
No changes of protocol were made. <br>
 
-
''Results:''
 
-
Nanodrop after sample was dried down: <br>
 
-
'''Sample 1:''' Concentration: 192ng/ul Purity: 1.96/1.90 <br>
 
-
'''Sample 2:''' Concentration: 200ng/ul Purity: 1.84/1.88 <br><br>
 
-
----
 
-
==== Two-step PCR of miniprep ====
+
== Retinal ==
-
<br>
+
-
===== First step: PCR of miniprep with mutation primers =====
+
-
<br>
+
-
''Done by:'' Louise <br>
+
-
''Date:'' September 7th <br>
+
-
''Protocol:'' [[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#CP1.1 CP1.1]] <br>
+
-
''Notes:'' <br>
+
-
'''3 x Premix 1:''' <br>
+
-
114.3ul water <br>
+
-
15ul Pfu Buffer <br>
+
-
4.5ul dNTP <br>
+
-
3ul MgSO4 <br>
+
-
4.5ul FlhDC fw <br>
+
-
4.5ul FlhDCmut rev <br>
+
-
1.2ul PFU <br>
+
-
3ul template (miniprep) <br><br>
+
-
'''3 x Premix 2:''' <br>
+
-
114.3ul water <br>
+
-
15ul Pfu Buffer <br>
+
-
4.5ul dNTP <br>
+
-
3ul MgSO4 <br>
+
-
4.5ul FlhDCmut fw <br>
+
-
4.5ul FlhDC rev <br>
+
-
1.2ul PFU <br>
+
-
3ul template (miniprep) <br><br>
+
-
''Results:''
+
-
<br>
+
-
The PCR samples were run on a 1.5% gel with a 100bp-1000bp ladder. All samples looked okay and were pooled as sample 1.1 and sample 2.1 <br>
+
-
NanoDrop: <br>
+
-
'''Sample 1.1:''' Concentration: 359.5ng/ul Purity: 1.83/2.20 <br>
+
-
'''Sample 2.1:''' Concentration: 304.1ng/ul Purity: 1.85/2.23 <br>
+
-
===== Second step: 2-step PCR with mutated template sample 1.1 and 2.1 and FlhDC fw and rev primers =====
+
=== Gradient PCR on ninaB (after PCR with ninaB2fw and ninaB2rv) with ninaBfw and ninaBrv ===
-
<br>
+
Date: 30/08<br>
-
''Done by:'' Maria <br>
+
Done by: Tommy & Marie<br>
-
''Date:'' September 9th <br>
+
Methods: PCR<br>
-
''Protocol:'' [[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#CP1.1 CP1.1]] <br>
+
Protocols: CP1.1[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#CP1.1]<br>
-
''Notes:'' <br>
+
Notes: <br>
-
'''Premix:''' <br>
+
To finde the optimal anneling temperatur a gradient PCR from 60 to 75 degrees<br>
-
38ul water <br>
+
"ninaB" was used as template and ninaB2fw and ninaB2rv was used as primers<br>
-
5ul PFU buffer + MgSO4 <br>
+
 
-
1.5ul dNTP <br>
+
PCR Program:<br>
-
1ul Sample 1.1 <br>
+
<table style="text-align: left;" border="1" cellpadding="2"
-
1ul Sample 2.1 <br>
+
cellspacing="2">
-
1.5ul FlhDC fw primer <br>
+
-
1.5ul FlhDC rev primer <br>
+
-
0.5ul PFU <br><br>
+
-
'''PCR Program:''' <br>
+
-
<table style="text-align: left; height: 260px; width: 225px;" border="1"
+
-
cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2">
+
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">1:Start<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Start<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">95C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">94&nbsp; C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">2 min<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">2 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">2: Denaturing<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Denaturing<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">95C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">94 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">30 sec<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">1 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">3: Annealing<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Annealing<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">56C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Grad. C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">30 sec<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">1 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">4: Elongation<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Elongation<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">72C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">72 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">2 min<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">4 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">5:<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Goto2<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">GO TO<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">rep<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">2 rep. 4x<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">29x<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">6: Denaturing<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">End<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">95C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">72 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">30 sec<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">5 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">7: Annealing<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Hold<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">63C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">4 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">30 sec<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;"><br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
Vary small amount of the product are observed, it is pooled and gel purifid, the nanodrop shows 372,3 and 377,1 ng/uL.
 +
 +
=== Gel purification af ninaB from gradient PCR ===
 +
Date: 31/08<br>
 +
Done by: Tommy & Marie<br>
 +
Methods: PCR<br>
 +
Protocols: CP1.1[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#CP1.1]<br>
 +
Notes: <br>
 +
Gel purification was preformed on the pooled product from the gradient PCR according to the protocol<br>
 +
After the gel purification the 2 samples was pooled and nanodroped: 7.0 ng/ul<br>
 +
Furthere PCR was preformed on the purifid product<br>
 +
 +
 +
=== Gel purification af ninaB from gradient PCR ===
 +
Date: 1/09<br>
 +
Done by: Tommy & Marie<br>
 +
Methods: PCR<br>
 +
Protocols: CP1.3[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#CP1.3]<br>
 +
Notes: <br>
 +
PCR was run according to protocol to the following to this program<br> 
 +
Gel purified produckt was used as template and ninaBfw and ninaBrv was used as primers<br>
 +
PCR Program:<br>
 +
<table style="text-align: left;" border="1" cellpadding="2"
 +
cellspacing="2">
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">8: Elongation<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Start<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">72C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">94&nbsp; C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">2 min<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">2 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">9:<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Denaturing<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">GO TO<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">94 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">6 rep. 25x<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">1 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">10: End <br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Annealing<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">72C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Grad. C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">5 min<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">1 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">12: Hold<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Elongation<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">4C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">72 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;"><br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">4 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
-
</table> <br><br>
+
<tr>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Goto2<br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">rep<br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">44x<br>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">End<br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">72 C<br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">5 min<br>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Hold<br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;">4 C<br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td style="vertical-align: top;"><br>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
-
''Results:'' <br>
+
=== Restriction digest of ninaB ===
-
Some of the PCR product was run on a 1.5% gel with a 10kb ladder. <br>
+
Date: 2/09<br>
-
The rest of the product was extracted from a new gel.
+
Done by: Tommy & Marie<br>
 +
Methods: restriction digest<br>
 +
Protocols: RD1.1[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#RD1.1]<br>
 +
Notes: <br>
 +
EcoRI and PstI ristriction enzymes was used and the ristriction digest was preformed according to protocol<br>
 +
No gel purification was preformed, purificatin was preformed directly from the restriction mixture<br>
 +
Purification was deno using the GFX purification kit and proformed according to that protocol, the purifid product was nanodroped: 3,1 ng/uL
-
===== PCR of Gel extraction =====
+
=== "Cross-PCR" on ninaB ===
-
<br>
+
Date: 2/09<br>
-
''Done by:'' Maria <br>
+
Done by: Tommy & Marie<br>
-
''Date:'' September 9th <br>
+
Methods: PCR<br>
-
''Protocol:'' [[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#CP1.1 CP1.1]] <br>
+
Protocols: CP1.1[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#CP1.1]<br>
-
''Notes:'' <br>
+
Notes: <br>
-
'''Premix x 6:''' <br>
+
Tubes A: ninaBfw and ninaB2rv<br>
-
234ul water <br>
+
Tubes B: ninaB2fw and ninaBrv<br>
-
30ul PFU buffer + MgSO4 <br>
+
NinaB PCR product with ninaB2fw and rv was used as template, both the tubes was run on the same PCR program
-
9ul dNTP <br>
+
<table style="text-align: left;" border="1" cellpadding="2"
-
9ul FlhDC fw primer <br>
+
cellspacing="2">
-
9ul FlhDC rev primer <br>
+
-
2.5ul PFU <br>
+
-
6ul template <br>
+
-
 
+
-
<table style="text-align: left; height: 260px; width: 225px;" border="1"
+
-
cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2">
+
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">1:Start<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Start<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">95C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">94&nbsp; C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">2 min<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">2 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">2: Denaturing<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Denaturing<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">95C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">94 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">30sec<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">1 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">3: Annealing<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Annealing<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">63C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">68 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">30 sec<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">1 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">4: Elongation<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Elongation<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">72C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">72 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">2 min<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">4 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">5:<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Goto2<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">GO TO<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">rep<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">2 rep. 29x<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">44x<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">6: End <br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">End<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">72C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">72 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;">5 min<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">5 min<br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 102px;">7: Hold<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Hold<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 52px;">4C<br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;">4 C<br>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align: top; width: 45px;"><br>
+
<td style="vertical-align: top;"><br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
-
</table> <br><br>
+
</table>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Miniprep of J13002 ===
 +
Date: 3/09<br>
 +
Done by: Tommy & Marie<br>
 +
Methods: Miniprep<br>
 +
Protocols: MP1.1[https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#MP1.1]<br>
 +
Notes: <br>
 +
The minipreps was done according to protocol<br>
 +
Nanodrop:<br>
 +
Tube 1: 38,9 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 20,5 ng/ul <br>
 +
Tube 2: 36,9 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 18,7 ng/ul <br>
 +
Tube 3: 38,4 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 20,0 ng/ul <br>
 +
Tube 4: 32,6 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 16,4 ng/ul <br>
 +
 
 +
The pooled samples was nanodroped: 20,6 ng/uL

Latest revision as of 19:21, 16 October 2010

Lab notes (8/30 - 9/5)

Contents


Flagella


Since the previous FlhDCmut was wrongly mutated due to incorrect mutation primers, we are now back to square one with new correct primers. The next weeks the flagella-group are working according to the following plan:
1) Miniprep of plasmids with "wrong" FlhDCmut

2) Two-step PCR to get mutatet FlhDC
3) Cut and Ligate into pSB1C3 and pSB1AK3 and transform into TOP10 cells
4) Send to sequencing
5) Characterize biobrick

Miniprep of "wrong" FlhDCmut


Done by: Louise
Date: September 3rd
Protocol: [MP1.2]
Notes:
No changes of protocol were made.
Results: Nanodrop after sample was dried down:
Sample 1: Concentration: 192ng/ul Purity: 1.96/1.90
Sample 2: Concentration: 200ng/ul Purity: 1.84/1.88

The samples were run on a 1.5% gel with a 10kb ladder. The bands are positioned between 1500bp and 1200bp. FlhDCmut in pSB1C3 is 1248bp.
Team SDU-Denmark Miniprep af flhDCmut i 1C3.jpg

Photosensor

PCR on pKJ606 with PSfw and VR primers

Date: 31/8
https://2010.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:SDU-Denmark/labnotes8&action=edit&section=3 Done by: LC
Methods: PCR
Protocols: CP1.3[1]
Notes:
Premix:
7,5 µl 10xTAQ Buffer
3 µl MgCl2
3 µl VF2
3 µl VR
1,5 µl dNTP
55,5 µl H2O
3 µl template (PS1 miniprep)
3/8 µl TAQ Polymerase

PCR Program:

Start
 94  C
 2 min
Denaturing
 94 C
 1 min
Annealing
 55 C
 1 min
Elongation
 72 C
 3 min
Goto2
 rep
 29x
End
 72 C
 3 min
Hold
 4 C



Results: The bands that showed up were around 2500 BP as expected from the sequencing results. This means that the designed primers have a high possibility of working, so that they will be ordered.
Team-SDU-Denmark-PSfwVR.jpg

PCR on pKJ606 with PSfw and PSrv primers

Date: 02/09
Done by: LC
Methods: PCR
Protocols: CP1.3[2]
Notes:
Premix:
7,5 µl 10xTAQ Buffer
3 µl MgCl2
3 µl VF2
3 µl VR
1,5 µl dNTP
55,5 µl H2O
3 µl template (PS1 miniprep)
3/8 µl TAQ Polymerase

PCR Program:

Start
 94  C
 2 min
Denaturing
 94 C
 1 min
Annealing
 55 C
 1 min
Elongation
 72 C
 2 min
Goto2
 rep
 29x
End
 72 C
 3 min
Hold
 4 C



Results: The bands that showed up were around 1750 BP, further confirming sequencing results. New primers for taking the whole gene out have been ordered.
Team-SDU-Denmark-PSfwrv.jpg

PCR on pKJ606 with fwPS2 and rvPS2 primers

Date: 04/09
Done by: LC
Methods: PCR
Protocols: CP1.3[3]
Notes:
Premix:
12,5 µl 10xTAQ Buffer
5 µl MgCl2
5 µl VF2
5 µl VR
2,5 µl dNTP
59,5 µl H2O
4 µl template (Consisting of 2 µl H2O and 2 µl of pKJ606 miniprep)
1/2 µl TAQ Polymerase

PCR Program:

Start
 94  C
 2 min
Denaturing
 94 C
 1 min
Annealing
 55 C
 1 min
Elongation
 72 C
 2:30 min
Goto2
 rep
 29x
End
 72 C
 3 min
Hold
 4 C



Results: Primers were confirmed working, the next step will be PFU pcr.

Retinal

Gradient PCR on ninaB (after PCR with ninaB2fw and ninaB2rv) with ninaBfw and ninaBrv

Date: 30/08
Done by: Tommy & Marie
Methods: PCR
Protocols: CP1.1[4]
Notes:
To finde the optimal anneling temperatur a gradient PCR from 60 to 75 degrees
"ninaB" was used as template and ninaB2fw and ninaB2rv was used as primers

PCR Program:

Start
 94  C
 2 min
Denaturing
 94 C
 1 min
Annealing
 Grad. C
 1 min
Elongation
 72 C
 4 min
Goto2
 rep
 29x
End
 72 C
 5 min
Hold
 4 C

Vary small amount of the product are observed, it is pooled and gel purifid, the nanodrop shows 372,3 and 377,1 ng/uL.

Gel purification af ninaB from gradient PCR

Date: 31/08
Done by: Tommy & Marie
Methods: PCR
Protocols: CP1.1[5]
Notes:
Gel purification was preformed on the pooled product from the gradient PCR according to the protocol
After the gel purification the 2 samples was pooled and nanodroped: 7.0 ng/ul
Furthere PCR was preformed on the purifid product


Gel purification af ninaB from gradient PCR

Date: 1/09
Done by: Tommy & Marie
Methods: PCR
Protocols: CP1.3[6]
Notes:
PCR was run according to protocol to the following to this program
Gel purified produckt was used as template and ninaBfw and ninaBrv was used as primers
PCR Program:

Start
 94  C
 2 min
Denaturing
 94 C
 1 min
Annealing
 Grad. C
 1 min
Elongation
 72 C
 4 min
Goto2
 rep
 44x
End
 72 C
 5 min
Hold
 4 C

Restriction digest of ninaB

Date: 2/09
Done by: Tommy & Marie
Methods: restriction digest
Protocols: RD1.1[7]
Notes:
EcoRI and PstI ristriction enzymes was used and the ristriction digest was preformed according to protocol
No gel purification was preformed, purificatin was preformed directly from the restriction mixture
Purification was deno using the GFX purification kit and proformed according to that protocol, the purifid product was nanodroped: 3,1 ng/uL

"Cross-PCR" on ninaB

Date: 2/09
Done by: Tommy & Marie
Methods: PCR
Protocols: CP1.1[8]
Notes:
Tubes A: ninaBfw and ninaB2rv
Tubes B: ninaB2fw and ninaBrv
NinaB PCR product with ninaB2fw and rv was used as template, both the tubes was run on the same PCR program

Start
 94  C
 2 min
Denaturing
 94 C
 1 min
Annealing
 68 C
 1 min
Elongation
 72 C
 4 min
Goto2
 rep
 44x
End
 72 C
 5 min
Hold
 4 C


Miniprep of J13002

Date: 3/09
Done by: Tommy & Marie
Methods: Miniprep
Protocols: MP1.1[9]
Notes:
The minipreps was done according to protocol
Nanodrop:
Tube 1: 38,9 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 20,5 ng/ul
Tube 2: 36,9 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 18,7 ng/ul
Tube 3: 38,4 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 20,0 ng/ul
Tube 4: 32,6 ng/ul, 2nd elution: 16,4 ng/ul

The pooled samples was nanodroped: 20,6 ng/uL

Retrieved from "http://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/labnotes8"