From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| (262 intermediate revisions not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | {{ETHZ_Basel10}}
| |
| | | | |
| - | = Lab =
| |
| - |
| |
| - | = Modeling =
| |
| - | * [[Team:ETHZ_Basel/Modeling/Sorokina2009|Light-switch]]: There is a problem regarding adapting the original model to our possible experimental setup.
| |
| - |
| |
| - | = Track selection =
| |
| - | Think about the Track selection!
| |
| - | Here are the possibilities and a short summary of the 2009 team than won this award:
| |
| - | #Best Food and Energy Project: UNIPV-Pavia. They tried to produce ethanol from cheese whey
| |
| - | #Best Environmental Project: Cambridge. Pigment production in E.coli
| |
| - | #Best Health and Medicine Project: Stanford. A Probiotic Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
| |
| - | #Best Manufacturing Project: Imperial College London. The E.ncapsulator, a versatile manufacture and delivery platform by which therapeutics can be reliably targeted to the intestine.
| |
| - | #Best New Application Area: Valencia. iLCD, iGEM Lighting Cell Display.
| |
| - | #Best Foundation Advance: Alberta. A Synthetic Biology Tool Kit for Artificial Genome Design and Construction.
| |
| - | #Best Information Processing Project: TUDelft. Bacterial Relay Race, a cell-to-cell communication system that allows the propagation of a set of instructions coded on a plasmid, and not just binary information as in quorum sensing.
| |
| - | #Best Software Tool: Berkeley Software & Illinois-Tools (Tie). Eugene, Spectacles, and Kepler: Managing Synthetic Biology Device Development.
| |
| - | According to the group meeting on Monday, August 9th, the track choice is either best new application area or best information processing project. A final decision will be taken once the deadline date is announced.
| |
Latest revision as of 11:22, 25 December 2010
"
