Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 6
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 7">week 7</a></li> | <li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 7">week 7</a></li> | ||
<li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 8">week 8</a></li> | <li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 8">week 8</a></li> | ||
+ | <li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 9">week 9</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Protocols">protocols</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Protocols">protocols</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Safety">safety</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Safety">safety</a></li> | ||
Line 88: | Line 89: | ||
<!------------- Tuesday -------------> | <!------------- Tuesday -------------> | ||
<h4> pSB74 transformant copper growth assay</h4> | <h4> pSB74 transformant copper growth assay</h4> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/e/ed/Yale-le392-ps574.jpg" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li> Looked at results of the previous day's assay and saw that the presence of pSB74 actually decreased the copper tolerance of the LE392. Maybe the effort associated with protein production actually weakens the cell's ability to deal with the copper? </li> | <li> Looked at results of the previous day's assay and saw that the presence of pSB74 actually decreased the copper tolerance of the LE392. Maybe the effort associated with protein production actually weakens the cell's ability to deal with the copper? </li> | ||
Line 96: | Line 100: | ||
<li> Ran 1.0% agarose gels of both the colony PCR reactions and EcoRI digestion of minipreps. Gels contained 10 uL of ethidium bromide and were run at 90 V with a 1 kb ladder, but the power source malfunctioned and turned off at some point, so the gel sat for an unknown amount of time. Restarted power source, let run, and then visualized the gels </li> | <li> Ran 1.0% agarose gels of both the colony PCR reactions and EcoRI digestion of minipreps. Gels contained 10 uL of ethidium bromide and were run at 90 V with a 1 kb ladder, but the power source malfunctioned and turned off at some point, so the gel sat for an unknown amount of time. Restarted power source, let run, and then visualized the gels </li> | ||
<li>Digestion of miniprep shows that all ligation efforts failed--had they succeeded there would have been fragments at 7.8 kb, but as the gel below shows, all the samples run at slightly over 3 kb (ladder rungs are 500 bp, 1 kb, 1.5 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, 5 kb, 6 kb, 8 kb, & 10 kb).</li> | <li>Digestion of miniprep shows that all ligation efforts failed--had they succeeded there would have been fragments at 7.8 kb, but as the gel below shows, all the samples run at slightly over 3 kb (ladder rungs are 500 bp, 1 kb, 1.5 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, 5 kb, 6 kb, 8 kb, & 10 kb).</li> | ||
- | + | <div align="center"> | |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/cf/Yale-ligation-digest.jpg" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<li> Efforts to visualize the colony PCR gel failed entirely--maybe forgot to add ethidium bromide? But given above results, it's a moot point. </li> | <li> Efforts to visualize the colony PCR gel failed entirely--maybe forgot to add ethidium bromide? But given above results, it's a moot point. </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 151: | Line 157: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<b>Analysis of SpeI activity</b> <br/> | <b>Analysis of SpeI activity</b> <br/> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/7/78/Yale-spe1test.jpg" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<li> Ran the SpeI digest of B0015 on a gel versus the circular B0015 and a 1 kb ladder (leftmost lane). The digested plasmid (rightmost lane) ran slower than the undigested one (middle lane), confirming that SpeI is active and successfully linearized the plasmid. </li> | <li> Ran the SpeI digest of B0015 on a gel versus the circular B0015 and a 1 kb ladder (leftmost lane). The digested plasmid (rightmost lane) ran slower than the undigested one (middle lane), confirming that SpeI is active and successfully linearized the plasmid. </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> |
Latest revision as of 02:52, 28 October 2010
our project
lab notebook: week 6 (7/12-7/18)
- Monday 7/12--Copper growth assay of pSB74 transformants & continued ligation work See more/less
- Tuesday 7/13--Transformant Copper growth assay, ligation attempt #4 results, and copper removal assay prep See more/less
- Wednesday 7/14--Copper Removal assay work and 5th attempt to ligate phsABC into terminator B0015 See more/less
- Thursday 7/15--Confirmation of SpeI activity and EtOH precipitation of ligation components See more/less
- Friday 7/16--Experimentation with different treatments of vector & insert DNA prior to ligation See more/less