Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 6

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
<li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 7">week 7</a></li>
<li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 7">week 7</a></li>
<li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 8">week 8</a></li>
<li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 8">week 8</a></li>
 +
<li id="nb"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 9">week 9</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Protocols">protocols</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Protocols">protocols</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Safety">safety</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our Project/Safety">safety</a></li>
Line 88: Line 89:
<!------------- Tuesday ------------->
<!------------- Tuesday ------------->
<h4> pSB74 transformant copper growth assay</h4>
<h4> pSB74 transformant copper growth assay</h4>
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/e/ed/Yale-le392-ps574.jpg" />
 +
</div>
<ul>
<ul>
<li> Looked at results of the previous day's assay and saw that the presence of pSB74 actually decreased the copper tolerance of the LE392.  Maybe the effort associated with protein production actually weakens the cell's ability to deal with the copper? </li>
<li> Looked at results of the previous day's assay and saw that the presence of pSB74 actually decreased the copper tolerance of the LE392.  Maybe the effort associated with protein production actually weakens the cell's ability to deal with the copper? </li>
Line 96: Line 100:
<li> Ran 1.0% agarose gels of both the colony PCR reactions and EcoRI digestion of minipreps.  Gels contained 10 uL of ethidium bromide and were run at 90 V with a 1 kb ladder, but the power source malfunctioned and turned off at some point, so the gel sat for an unknown amount of time. Restarted power source, let run, and then visualized the gels </li>
<li> Ran 1.0% agarose gels of both the colony PCR reactions and EcoRI digestion of minipreps.  Gels contained 10 uL of ethidium bromide and were run at 90 V with a 1 kb ladder, but the power source malfunctioned and turned off at some point, so the gel sat for an unknown amount of time. Restarted power source, let run, and then visualized the gels </li>
<li>Digestion of miniprep shows that all ligation efforts failed--had they succeeded there would have been fragments at 7.8 kb, but as the gel below shows, all the samples run at slightly over  3 kb (ladder rungs are 500 bp, 1 kb, 1.5 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, 5 kb, 6 kb, 8 kb, & 10 kb).</li>
<li>Digestion of miniprep shows that all ligation efforts failed--had they succeeded there would have been fragments at 7.8 kb, but as the gel below shows, all the samples run at slightly over  3 kb (ladder rungs are 500 bp, 1 kb, 1.5 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, 5 kb, 6 kb, 8 kb, & 10 kb).</li>
-
 
+
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/cf/Yale-ligation-digest.jpg" />
 +
</div>
<li> Efforts to visualize the colony PCR gel failed entirely--maybe forgot to add ethidium bromide? But given above results, it's a moot point.  </li>
<li> Efforts to visualize the colony PCR gel failed entirely--maybe forgot to add ethidium bromide? But given above results, it's a moot point.  </li>
</ul>
</ul>
Line 150: Line 156:
<!------------- Thursday ------------->
<!------------- Thursday ------------->
<ul>
<ul>
-
<b> Analysis of SpeI activity</b> <br/>
+
<b>Analysis of SpeI activity</b> <br/>
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/7/78/Yale-spe1test.jpg" />
 +
</div>
<li> Ran the SpeI digest of B0015 on a gel versus the circular B0015 and a 1 kb ladder (leftmost lane).  The digested plasmid (rightmost lane) ran slower than the undigested one (middle lane), confirming that SpeI is active and successfully linearized the plasmid. </li>
<li> Ran the SpeI digest of B0015 on a gel versus the circular B0015 and a 1 kb ladder (leftmost lane).  The digested plasmid (rightmost lane) ran slower than the undigested one (middle lane), confirming that SpeI is active and successfully linearized the plasmid. </li>
</ul>
</ul>
Line 156: Line 165:
<ul>
<ul>
<li> Guessing that higher concentrations of insert and vector might improve ligation results, ethanol precipitate the digested samples from 7/14 according to the following <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our_Project/Protocols/EtOH_precipitate"> protocol </a> </li>
<li> Guessing that higher concentrations of insert and vector might improve ligation results, ethanol precipitate the digested samples from 7/14 according to the following <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our_Project/Protocols/EtOH_precipitate"> protocol </a> </li>
 +
<li> In case need more material, started five overnight liquid cultures of  each pSB74 and B0015 in Amp LB for morning miniprep. </li>
 +
</ul>
<i> Wetlab work for this day is also recorded on page 69 of the hard copy lab notebook.</i>
<i> Wetlab work for this day is also recorded on page 69 of the hard copy lab notebook.</i>
<!------------- Thursday ------------->
<!------------- Thursday ------------->
Line 161: Line 172:
<li>
<li>
-
Friday 7/16--
+
Friday 7/16--Experimentation with different treatments of vector & insert DNA prior to ligation
</li>
</li>
Line 167: Line 178:
<div style="display:none;" id="friday">
<div style="display:none;" id="friday">
<!------------- Friday ------------->
<!------------- Friday ------------->
-
Extra content
+
<h4>Stockpiling starting materials </h4>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li> Miniprepped the overnight cultures of pSB74 and B0015 <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our_Project/Protocols/miniprep"> by vacuum manifold </a> and found the resulting concentrations by nanodrop.  The five B0015 samples had concentrations of 83.7, 83.4, 111.7, 130.0, and 103.3 ng/uL while the pSB74 samples had concentration values of 118.7, 129.5, 118.2, 137.3, and 124.9 ng/uL. </li>
 +
<li> Set up 8 PCR reactions with pSB74 samples using the "phs50" thermocycler protocol and the DMSO variant of PCR reaction contents from <a href=" https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our_Project/Notebook/Week_4"> 6/30 </a>.</li>
 +
<li> Also ran four digestions of B0015 with XbaI, each of which included 5 uL NEB buffer 4, 0.5 uL 100x BSA, 3.6 uL XbaI, 7.7 uL B0015 (1 ug worth), and 33.2 uL of water.  Let these run for two hours at 37˚C </li>
 +
<li> Meanwhile attempted to resuspend ethanol precipitated DNA, but nanodrop showed no DNA present--pellets must have fallen out of tubes when inverted to dry.  </li>
 +
<li> After XbaI digestion of B0015 skipped PCR purification step (concerned that it was leading to product loss)and simply added 0.5 uL of 5 M NaCl to each digestion so that the buffer solution would have the salt content required by EcoRI.  Then added 2 uL of EcoRI to each digestion and let incubate for 2 hours at 37˚C.  One hour into this digestion, added 1 uL of CIP to half (two) of the digestion reactions (want to see if it makes a difference). </li>
 +
<li> Following the PCR amplification of phsABC, ran the vacuum manifold <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our_Project/Protocols/PCR_purify">PCR cleanup protocol</a> on four out of the eight reaction solutions and measured the DNA concentrations of the resulting solutions as 99.5, 131.2, 75.5, 36.2, and 26.2 ng/uL. </li>
 +
<li> Concerned that phsABC may not be getting digested properly, especially given that its cut sites are so near its ends.  While running the required EcoRI/SpeI double digestion, will run in parallel single digestions of phsABC with each EcoRI and SpeI.  While the amount cut off makes these digestions impossible to detect directly, if the digestions occur properly the resulting fragments should be able to self-ligate, so it is possible to test for that. </li>
 +
<li> The two double digestions had contents as follows: 5 uL EcoRI buffer, 0.5 uL 100x BSA, 10.5 uL phsABC (1 ug DNA), 1.8 uL EcoRI, 1.8 uL SpeI, and 30.4 uL water. </li>
 +
<li> The diagnostic single digestions were run with 13.2 uL phsABC (at 75.5 ng/uL, 1 ug), 5 uL EcoRI buffer, 0.5 uL BSA, 27.7 uL water, and 3.6 uL of the relevant enzyme whether EcoRI or SpeI. </li>
 +
<li> All of the above digestions were run for eight hours at 37˚C before being heat-killed with 20 minutes at 80˚C. </li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<i> Wetlab work for this day is also recorded on pages 70 & 71 of the hard copy lab notebook.</i>
<!------------- Friday ------------->
<!------------- Friday ------------->
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 02:52, 28 October 2010

iGEM Yale

lab notebook: week 6 (7/12-7/18)

  • Monday 7/12--Copper growth assay of pSB74 transformants & continued ligation work
  • See more/less
  • Tuesday 7/13--Transformant Copper growth assay, ligation attempt #4 results, and copper removal assay prep
  • See more/less
  • Wednesday 7/14--Copper Removal assay work and 5th attempt to ligate phsABC into terminator B0015
  • See more/less
  • Thursday 7/15--Confirmation of SpeI activity and EtOH precipitation of ligation components
  • See more/less
  • Friday 7/16--Experimentation with different treatments of vector & insert DNA prior to ligation
  • See more/less