Team:Stockholm/6 October 2010

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Andreas)
(BL21 transformation)
Line 64: Line 64:
**pEX.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS
**pEX.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS
**pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS
**pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS
 +
 +
----
 +
==Nina==
 +
 +
===Colony PCR on Fusion protein and protein A===
 +
 +
I screened four colonies per dish.
 +
 +
*Master mix with shipping vector verification primers (VF2 and VR):
 +
 +
[[Image:Z.jpg]]
 +
 +
*Master mix with peX verification primers:
 +
 +
[[Image:Xz.jpg]]
 +
 +
===Agarose gel===
 +
 +
I ran the PCR products on an 1 % agarose gel (110 V) in order to confirm the inserts in the desired vectors.
 +
 +
Ladder: MassRuler™ DNA Ladder Mix, ready-to-use, 80-10,000 bp
 +
 +
[[Image:Laddermixmassruler.jpg]]
 +
 +
Arrengement on the gels:
 +
 +
[[Image:Zxc.jpg]]
 +
 +
*Results of the gels:
 +
 +
[[Image:As.jpg]]
 +
[[Image:Ad.jpg]]
 +
 +
All the Fusion and protein A bands look great, however the IgG protease bands look like they have not any insert which is bad. Tomorrow I'll run an agarose gel on my saved ligation sample of IgG protease in the gel cleaned peX vector. This will allow me to check for vector formation with a correct size and see if there has at least occured a ligation, if so I will run a new colony screen.
 +
 +
===Mini prep on His-IgG protease and His-Protein A===
 +
 +
I performed a mini prep on the inoculated colonies # 1, 2, 3 and 4 of N-terminal His-IgG protease and inoculated colonies # 1, 2, 3 and 4 of N-terminal His-Protein A.

Revision as of 04:23, 7 October 2010


Contents

Andreas

Sequencing results

Received sequencing results for the following samples (fasta):

  • pSB1K3.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 1 (VF2 & VR)
  • pSB1K3.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 2 (VF2 & VR)
  • pSB1K3.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 2 (VF2 & VR)
  • pSB1K3.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 3 (VF2 & VR)
  • pSB1K3.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 2 (VF2 & VR)
  • pSB1K3.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 3 (VF2 & VR)
  • pEX.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His (pEXf)
  • pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His (pEXf)

Sequences aligned using Geneious software, showing correct sequences for all constructs. Operon constructs all had an insertion between SpeI and PstI; this will not affect expression.

Plasmid prep

Of stored pellets and ON cultures from 5/10

  • E.Z.N.A. Plasmid Miniprep kit
    • 50 μ elution volume (elution buffer)
DNA concentration
Sample Conc [ng/μl] A260/A280
pEX.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 107.5 1.96
pEX.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 108.7 1.93
pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS 84.35 1.97
pSB1C3.His⋅SOD⋅cLMWP B 255.4 1.94
pSB1C3.His⋅SOD⋅cLMWP C 201.2 1.94
pSB1C3.His⋅SOD⋅cTAT D 369.5 1.92
pSB1C3.His⋅SOD⋅cTra10 A 188.6 1.95

BL21 transformation

Quick transformation w/ 30 min on ice, 50 sec heat-shock.

  • 30 μl competent BL21(DE3)
  • 1 μl plasmid
    • pEX.nTra10⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS
    • pEX.nTAT⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS
    • pEX.nLMWP⋅SOD⋅His.RBS.yCCS

Nina

Colony PCR on Fusion protein and protein A

I screened four colonies per dish.

  • Master mix with shipping vector verification primers (VF2 and VR):

Z.jpg

  • Master mix with peX verification primers:

Xz.jpg

Agarose gel

I ran the PCR products on an 1 % agarose gel (110 V) in order to confirm the inserts in the desired vectors.

Ladder: MassRuler™ DNA Ladder Mix, ready-to-use, 80-10,000 bp

Laddermixmassruler.jpg

Arrengement on the gels:

Zxc.jpg

  • Results of the gels:

As.jpg Ad.jpg

All the Fusion and protein A bands look great, however the IgG protease bands look like they have not any insert which is bad. Tomorrow I'll run an agarose gel on my saved ligation sample of IgG protease in the gel cleaned peX vector. This will allow me to check for vector formation with a correct size and see if there has at least occured a ligation, if so I will run a new colony screen.

Mini prep on His-IgG protease and His-Protein A

I performed a mini prep on the inoculated colonies # 1, 2, 3 and 4 of N-terminal His-IgG protease and inoculated colonies # 1, 2, 3 and 4 of N-terminal His-Protein A.