Team:Harvard/results

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(19 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<html>
<html>
<div id="sidebar">
<div id="sidebar">
-
<img id="teamphoto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9e/Harvard2010teamphoto.jpg" width="300px"><br />
+
<img id="teamphoto" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9e/Harvard2010teamphoto.jpg" width="300px"><br /><br/>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#vectors">vectors</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#vectors">vectors</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#flavor">flavor</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#flavor">flavor</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#geneticfence">genetic fence</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#geneticfence">genetic fence</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#parts">parts</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#parts">parts</a>
-
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#plants">plants</a>
 
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#future">future directions</a>
<a class="sidebarlinks" href="#future">future directions</a>
</div>
</div>
Line 15: Line 14:
<div id="abstract">
<div id="abstract">
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
-
<h1>Results</h1>
+
<a class="labnotebook" name="top"><h1>results</h1></a>
-
<a class="labnotebook" name="vectors"><h2>Vectors</h2></a>
+
<a class="labnotebook" name="vectors"><h2>vectors</h2></a>
-
<p>We modified six plant vectors to be compatible with BioBrick Standard 21.</p>
+
<p>We modified six plant vectors to be compatible with BioBrick Standard 21. We successfully cloned several parts into the expression series vectors V9 (BBa_K382002) and V10 (BBa_K382003), transformed the plasmids into <i>Agrobacterium</i>, and grew colonies that showed proper antibiotic resistance.</p>
<table style="padding:10px;color:#254117">
<table style="padding:10px;color:#254117">
Line 49: Line 48:
</a>
</a>
</td>
</td>
-
<td style="vertical-align:top"><p style="padding:10px"><br/>The expression series vectors contain a promoter preceding the multiple cloning site such that the inserted construct can be easily expressed through activation of the contained promoter. We modified the vectors pORE E3 and pORE E4. Both vectors contain the ENTCUP2 promoter. pORE E3 confers plant resistance to glufosinate, and pORE E4 confers plant resistance to kanamycin</p></td>
+
<td style="vertical-align:top"><p style="padding:10px"><br/>The expression series vectors contain a promoter preceding the multiple cloning site such that the inserted construct can be easily expressed through activation of the contained promoter. We modified the vectors pORE E3 and pORE E4. Both vectors contain the ENTCUP2 promoter. V9 (pORE E3) confers plant resistance to glufosinate, and V10 (pORE E4) confers plant resistance to kanamycin</p></td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 56: Line 55:
monocot and dicot plant transformation." <i>Transgenic Res</i> (2007) 16:771–781.
monocot and dicot plant transformation." <i>Transgenic Res</i> (2007) 16:771–781.
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
-
<a class="labnotebook" name="flavor"><h2>Flavor</h2></a>
+
 
 +
<a class="labnotebook" name="flavor"><h2>flavor</h2></a>
<p>
<p>
-
The two flavors that are currently ready for transformation into plants are the "taste-inverter" <u>miraculin</u> and the sweetener <u>brazzein</u>.  Given the long time-frame of plant transformation we used two different assays in <i>E. Coli</i> to confirm that our proteins could indeed be transcribed and translated. The results of those assays are shown here.
+
The two flavors that are currently ready for transformation into plants are the "taste-inverter" miraculin (BBa_K382021) and the sweetener brazzein (BBa_K382020).  Given the long time-frame of plant transformation we used two different assays in <i>E. Coli</i> to confirm that our proteins could indeed be transcribed and translated. The results of those assays are shown here.
</p>
</p>
-
<h3>Confirmation with <em>YFP-2x</em> Tags</h3>
+
<h3>confirmation with 2xYFP tags</h3>
<p>
<p>
-
In order to confirm that the Miraculin and Brazzein are able to be expressed in <i>E. Coli</i> we attached a <i>YFP-2x</i> tag sequence to the termini of both proteins.  The proteins were placed under an IPTG-expressible promoter and used spectrophotometry to determine the level of YFP fluorescence against a baseline, untagged protein.  Figure 1 shows relative-fluorescence at times post induction.  In all circumstances the levels of YFP-fluorescence increased.
+
In order to confirm that the miraculin and brazzein are able to be expressed in <i>E. Coli</i> we attached a 2xYFP tag sequence to both the N- and C-terminus of each protein.  The proteins were placed under an IPTG-expressible promoter and used spectrophotometry to determine the level of YFP fluorescence against a baseline, untagged protein.  Figure 1 shows relative-fluorescence at times post induction.  In all circumstances the levels of YFP-fluorescence increased.
</p>
</p>
Line 80: Line 80:
<p style="padding:10px">
<p style="padding:10px">
<br/>
<br/>
-
<u>Figure 1. Induced expression of YFP-tagged Miraculin and Brazzein in E. Coli</u></br>
+
<b>Figure 1. Induced expression of YFP-tagged Miraculin and Brazzein in <em>E. Coli</em></b></br>
-
Figure 1 (A) through (D) are normalized plots of Miraculin and Brazzein YFP-fused constructs expressed in E. Coli. <i>YFP-2x</i> tags were attached to both N- and C- termini to ensure that folding was not hindered.  In all cases relative YFP fluorescence had appreciably increased after 120 minutes as compared to the non-induced <i>E. Coli</i>
+
Figure 1 (A) through (D) are normalized plots of miraculin and brazzein YFP-fused constructs expressed in <em>E. Coli</em>. 2xYFP tags were attached to either the N- or C- terminus to ensure that folding was not hindered.  In all cases relative YFP fluorescence had appreciably increased after 120 minutes as compared to the non-induced <em>E. Coli</em>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
-
<h3>Confirmation with Western Blot</h3>
+
<h3>confirmation by western blot</h3>
<p>
<p>
-
A western blot assay was performed to check for <i>E. Coli</i> expression of Miraculin and Brazzein.  Proteins tagged at either the N- or C- terminus were placed under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter.  In the miraculin assay, no protein expression was seen.  It is possible that the protein does not express well in <i>E. Coli</i>, or that the plant-specific codon optimization of the proteins resulted in reduced expressibility.  Brazzein, specifically C-terminus tagged brazzein was seen to be highly expressed in <i>E. Coli</i>.
+
A western blot assay was performed to check for <i>E. Coli</i> expression of miraculin and brazzein.  Proteins tagged at either the N- or C- terminus were placed under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter.  In the miraculin assay, no protein expression was seen.  It is possible that the protein does not express well in <em>E. Coli</em>, or that the plant-specific codon optimization of the proteins resulted in reduced expressibility.  Brazzein, specifically C-terminus tagged brazzein was seen to be highly expressed in <em>E. Coli</em>.
</p>
</p>
Line 104: Line 104:
<p style="padding:10px">
<p style="padding:10px">
<br/>
<br/>
-
<u>Figure 2. Western Blot of Miraculin and Brazzein Expression in <i>E. Coli</i></u></br>
+
<b>Figure 2. Western Blot of Miraculin and Brazzein Expression in <em>E. Coli</em></b></br>
Proteins were tagged using a <i>StrepII</i> standard Antibody tag, attached to both N- and C- termini. Miraculin (A) does not appear to have been expressed in high enough quantities to be visualized. The expected protein weight is 25 kDa.  Brazzein (B) shows strong expression of a protein in the 10-15 kDa range.  Brazzein has an expected weight of 6.5 kDa, a discrepancy that we have attributed to inconsistencies in the gel.
Proteins were tagged using a <i>StrepII</i> standard Antibody tag, attached to both N- and C- termini. Miraculin (A) does not appear to have been expressed in high enough quantities to be visualized. The expected protein weight is 25 kDa.  Brazzein (B) shows strong expression of a protein in the 10-15 kDa range.  Brazzein has an expected weight of 6.5 kDa, a discrepancy that we have attributed to inconsistencies in the gel.
</td>
</td>
Line 110: Line 110:
</table>
</table>
-
<h3>Expression in Arabidopsis</h3>
+
<a class="labnotebook" name="geneticfence"><h2>genetic fence</h2></a>
-
<p>We are still waiting for the plants to grow to a size large enough that we can collect samples to verify expression, but we have selected for plants that have integrated the herbicide resistance marker along with the miraculin and brazzein expression constructs.</p>
+
<h3>induction of barnase (death gene) reduces cell growth</h3>
-
<p><strong>Miraculin:</strong></p>
+
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/53/V21selection.jpg" />
+
-
<p><strong>Brazzein:</strong></p>
+
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/fb/V25selection.jpg" />
+
-
<br /><br />
+
-
 
+
-
<a class="labnotebook" name="geneticfence"><h2>Genetic Fence</h2></a>
+
-
<h3>Induction of Barnase (death gene) reduces cell growth</h3>
+
-
<p>We characterized the activity of Barnase on an inducible plasmid constructed by <a href="http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/BerkiGEM2007Present5">UC Berkeley for iGEM 2007</a> (part I716408C). This contruct works by expressing background levels of Barstar with Barnase controlled by an arabinose inducible promoter such that it will overwhelm Barstar when induced. Higher levels of Barnase expression resulted in lower rates of growth in the bacteria, affirming the principle of Barnase-based growth control for the genetic fence, and confirming the results from Berkeley 2007. We characterized the growth repression of Barnase under a range of arabinose inducer concentrations.<br><br>
+
<p>We characterized the activity of Barnase on an inducible plasmid constructed by <a href="https://2007.igem.org/BerkiGEM2007Present5">UC Berkeley for iGEM 2007</a> (part I716408C). This contruct works by expressing background levels of Barstar with Barnase controlled by an arabinose inducible promoter such that it will overwhelm Barstar when induced. Higher levels of Barnase expression resulted in lower rates of growth in the bacteria, affirming the principle of Barnase-based growth control for the genetic fence, and confirming the results from Berkeley 2007. We characterized the growth repression of Barnase under a range of arabinose inducer concentrations.<br><br>
Our results show that expression of Barnase is effective in reducing cell growth, suggesting that Barnase will enable the genetic fence to prevent growth of iGarden plants outside of their designated areas.
Our results show that expression of Barnase is effective in reducing cell growth, suggesting that Barnase will enable the genetic fence to prevent growth of iGarden plants outside of their designated areas.
</p>
</p>
Line 128: Line 120:
<a href="http://openwetware.org/images/2/2b/M4-growth_curves-10-4-10.jpg" id="single_image">
<a href="http://openwetware.org/images/2/2b/M4-growth_curves-10-4-10.jpg" id="single_image">
<img src="http://openwetware.org/images/2/2b/M4-growth_curves-10-4-10.jpg" width="600px" border=0>
<img src="http://openwetware.org/images/2/2b/M4-growth_curves-10-4-10.jpg" width="600px" border=0>
-
</a> </div>
+
</a>  
<br>
<br>
Line 134: Line 126:
<p style="width;600px;">We transformed 11 completed vectors into Agrobacterium and successfully isolated clones:</p>
<p style="width;600px;">We transformed 11 completed vectors into Agrobacterium and successfully isolated clones:</p>
-
<b>Flavor Parts</b><br />
+
<h3>flavor parts</h3><br />
<ul>
<ul>
-
<li>Miraculin expression</li>
+
<li>miraculin expression</li>
-
<li>Brazzein expression</li>
+
<li>brazzein expression</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<br>
<br>
-
<b>RNAi knockdown conrols</b><br />
+
<b>expression in arabidopsis</b>
 +
<p>We are still waiting for the plants to grow to a size large enough that we can collect samples to verify expression, but we have selected for plants that have integrated the herbicide resistance marker along with the miraculin and brazzein expression constructs.</p>
 +
<p>Miraculin:</p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/53/V21selection.jpg" />
 +
<p>Brazzein:</p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/fb/V25selection.jpg" />
 +
<br /><br />
 +
 
 +
<h3>RNAi knockdown controls</h3><br />
<ul>
<ul>
-
<li>amiRNA GFP knockdown version 1: this vector will allow us to visualize RNAi knock-down of fluorescence</li>
+
<li>amiRNA GFP knockdown: this vector will allow us to visualize RNAi knock-down of fluorescence</li>
-
<li>amiRNA GFP knockdown version 2: this construct targets a different region of the GFP gene for visualization of RNAi knockdown of fluorescence</li>
+
</ul>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
-
<b>Allergy parts for RNAi targeting of several panallergen homologs in Arabidopsis</b><br />
+
<h3>allergy parts for RNAi targeting of several panallergen homologs in Arabidopsis</h3><br />
<ul>
<ul>
<li>LTP amiRNA</li>
<li>LTP amiRNA</li>
Line 157: Line 156:
<br />
<br />
-
<b>Color parts</b><br />
+
<b>expression in arabidopsis (Kan resistance)</b>
 +
<p>LTP amiRNA</p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/8/83/Ltpasprout.JPG" />
 +
<br /><br />
 +
<p>Ger3 hpRNA</p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/4/4a/Gerhsprout.JPG" />
 +
<br /><br />
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<h3>color parts</h3><br />
<ul>
<ul>
<li>LUT2 amiRNA: lycopene accumulation and red flowers</li>
<li>LUT2 amiRNA: lycopene accumulation and red flowers</li>
Line 166: Line 174:
<br />
<br />
-
<p style="width;600px;">All 11 vectors were transformed into Arabidopsis, the expression chassis. A complete list of these parts and other parts built and submitted to the registry, please check out our <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Harvard/parts">parts</a> page.</p>
+
<b>expression in arabidopsis (Kan resistance)</b>
 +
<p>Beta Ohase I</p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/b/ba/C2sprout.JPG" /><br /><br />
-
<a class="labnotebook" name="plants"><h2>Transformed plants</h2>
+
<p style="width;600px;">All 11 vectors were transformed into <i>Arabidopsis</i>, the expression chassis. A complete list of these parts and other parts built and submitted to the registry, please check out our <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Harvard/parts">parts</a> page.</p>
-
<p style="width;600px;">We raised Arabidopsis plants with the help of Kurt Schellenberg and the Mathews lab at the Harvard Herbarium and transformed them through the agrobacterium flower dip. For more detailed protocol and photos of the procedure, check out our <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Harvard/vectors/agrotoplants">plant protocols page</a>. The transformed plants produced seeds, which we harvested, dried, and plated onto selective agar plates. In the first few days after plating, all the seeds sprout.</p>
+
-
<p>Day 1:</p>
 
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/a2/Seedsclose-up.JPG" width="600px" />
 
-
 
-
<p>Day 2:</p>
 
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/2/28/Harvardsprouts.jpg" width="600px" />
 
-
 
-
<p>Day 3:</p>
 
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/6c/Seedlingsday2.JPG" />
 
-
 
-
<p>By Day 4 we began to see selection on the plates transformed with the <em>pat</em> resistance marker and selected on glufosinate (Basta)</p>
 
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/58/Day4seedlings.jpg" />
 
-
<br /><br />
 
-
<a class="labnotebook" name="future"><h2>Future Directions</h2>
+
<a class="labnotebook" name="future"><h2>future directions</h2>
-
<p style="width;600px;">Because plants take a long time to grow, we were unfortunately unable to verify the function of our parts in Arabidopsis. As soon as we have a sufficient amount of plant tissue, we can confirm that the plants growing on selective plates are transformed via PCR. Alternatively, the GFP knockdown plants should be identifiable by their loss of fluorescence. Stay updated with our results after the Jamboree by checking out our <a href="http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2010">OpenWetWare page</a>.
+
<p style="width;600px;">Because plants take a long time to grow, we were unfortunately unable to verify the function of our parts in <i>Arabidopsis</i>. As soon as we have a sufficient amount of plant tissue, we can confirm that the plants growing on selective plates are transformed via PCR. Alternatively, the GFP knockdown plants should be identifiable by their loss of fluorescence. Stay updated with our results after the Jamboree by checking out our <a href="http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2010">OpenWetWare page</a>.

Latest revision as of 18:08, 27 October 2010




results

vectors

We modified six plant vectors to be compatible with BioBrick Standard 21. We successfully cloned several parts into the expression series vectors V9 (BBa_K382002) and V10 (BBa_K382003), transformed the plasmids into Agrobacterium, and grew colonies that showed proper antibiotic resistance.

open series   click to enlarge


The open series vectors are designed for general insertion of a construct. We modified the vectors pORE O1 and pORE O2. pORE O1 confers plant resistance to glufosinate, and pORE O2 confers plant resistance to kanamycin, to be used in transformant selection.

reporter series   click to enlarge


The reporter series vectors contain a reporter on the trailing end of the multiple cloning site such that expression of the reporter follows that of the inserted construct. We modified the vectors pORE R1 and pORE R3. pORE R1 contains the gusA reporter, and pORE R3 the smgfp reporter. Both vectors confer plant resistance to kanamycin.

expression series   click to enlarge


The expression series vectors contain a promoter preceding the multiple cloning site such that the inserted construct can be easily expressed through activation of the contained promoter. We modified the vectors pORE E3 and pORE E4. Both vectors contain the ENTCUP2 promoter. V9 (pORE E3) confers plant resistance to glufosinate, and V10 (pORE E4) confers plant resistance to kanamycin

Source: Coutu, Catherine et al. "pORE: a modular binary vector series suited for both monocot and dicot plant transformation." Transgenic Res (2007) 16:771–781.

flavor

The two flavors that are currently ready for transformation into plants are the "taste-inverter" miraculin (BBa_K382021) and the sweetener brazzein (BBa_K382020). Given the long time-frame of plant transformation we used two different assays in E. Coli to confirm that our proteins could indeed be transcribed and translated. The results of those assays are shown here.

confirmation with 2xYFP tags

In order to confirm that the miraculin and brazzein are able to be expressed in E. Coli we attached a 2xYFP tag sequence to both the N- and C-terminus of each protein. The proteins were placed under an IPTG-expressible promoter and used spectrophotometry to determine the level of YFP fluorescence against a baseline, untagged protein. Figure 1 shows relative-fluorescence at times post induction. In all circumstances the levels of YFP-fluorescence increased.

Figure 1   click to enlarge


Figure 1. Induced expression of YFP-tagged Miraculin and Brazzein in E. Coli
Figure 1 (A) through (D) are normalized plots of miraculin and brazzein YFP-fused constructs expressed in E. Coli. 2xYFP tags were attached to either the N- or C- terminus to ensure that folding was not hindered. In all cases relative YFP fluorescence had appreciably increased after 120 minutes as compared to the non-induced E. Coli

confirmation by western blot

A western blot assay was performed to check for E. Coli expression of miraculin and brazzein. Proteins tagged at either the N- or C- terminus were placed under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter. In the miraculin assay, no protein expression was seen. It is possible that the protein does not express well in E. Coli, or that the plant-specific codon optimization of the proteins resulted in reduced expressibility. Brazzein, specifically C-terminus tagged brazzein was seen to be highly expressed in E. Coli.

Figure 2   click to enlarge


Figure 2. Western Blot of Miraculin and Brazzein Expression in E. Coli
Proteins were tagged using a StrepII standard Antibody tag, attached to both N- and C- termini. Miraculin (A) does not appear to have been expressed in high enough quantities to be visualized. The expected protein weight is 25 kDa. Brazzein (B) shows strong expression of a protein in the 10-15 kDa range. Brazzein has an expected weight of 6.5 kDa, a discrepancy that we have attributed to inconsistencies in the gel.

genetic fence

induction of barnase (death gene) reduces cell growth

We characterized the activity of Barnase on an inducible plasmid constructed by UC Berkeley for iGEM 2007 (part I716408C). This contruct works by expressing background levels of Barstar with Barnase controlled by an arabinose inducible promoter such that it will overwhelm Barstar when induced. Higher levels of Barnase expression resulted in lower rates of growth in the bacteria, affirming the principle of Barnase-based growth control for the genetic fence, and confirming the results from Berkeley 2007. We characterized the growth repression of Barnase under a range of arabinose inducer concentrations.

Our results show that expression of Barnase is effective in reducing cell growth, suggesting that Barnase will enable the genetic fence to prevent growth of iGarden plants outside of their designated areas.


barnase growth control in E. Coli   [click to enlarge]


Parts transferred to the Agrobacterium shuttle chassis

We transformed 11 completed vectors into Agrobacterium and successfully isolated clones:

flavor parts


  • miraculin expression
  • brazzein expression

expression in arabidopsis

We are still waiting for the plants to grow to a size large enough that we can collect samples to verify expression, but we have selected for plants that have integrated the herbicide resistance marker along with the miraculin and brazzein expression constructs.

Miraculin:

Brazzein:



RNAi knockdown controls


  • amiRNA GFP knockdown: this vector will allow us to visualize RNAi knock-down of fluorescence

allergy parts for RNAi targeting of several panallergen homologs in Arabidopsis


  • LTP amiRNA
  • LTP hpRNA
  • Ger3 hpRNA
  • Bet v 1 hpRNA

expression in arabidopsis (Kan resistance)

LTP amiRNA



Ger3 hpRNA



color parts


  • LUT2 amiRNA: lycopene accumulation and red flowers
  • LYC amiRNA: lycopene accumulation and red flowers
  • Beta Ohase I amiRNA: beta carotene accumulation and orange flowers

expression in arabidopsis (Kan resistance)

Beta Ohase I



All 11 vectors were transformed into Arabidopsis, the expression chassis. A complete list of these parts and other parts built and submitted to the registry, please check out our parts page.

future directions

Because plants take a long time to grow, we were unfortunately unable to verify the function of our parts in Arabidopsis. As soon as we have a sufficient amount of plant tissue, we can confirm that the plants growing on selective plates are transformed via PCR. Alternatively, the GFP knockdown plants should be identifiable by their loss of fluorescence. Stay updated with our results after the Jamboree by checking out our OpenWetWare page.