"
Team:Stanford/Research
From 2010.igem.org
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
'''Useful''': For reporting on a situation with a boolean output: disease detection, preterm labor warning, cancer metastasis warning | '''Useful''': For reporting on a situation with a boolean output: disease detection, preterm labor warning, cancer metastasis warning | ||
| - | + | [[Image:sRNADevice|A device-level view of our sRNA system]] | |
===The [[Team:Stanford/Analog Sensor|Second Sensor:]]=== | ===The [[Team:Stanford/Analog Sensor|Second Sensor:]]=== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
'''Useful''': For acting in a situation requiring a graded response: drug delivery, metabolic flux control, detailed ratiometric reporting | '''Useful''': For acting in a situation requiring a graded response: drug delivery, metabolic flux control, detailed ratiometric reporting | ||
| + | [[Image:EnzymePairDevice|A device-level view of our Kinase/Phosphatase system]] | ||
'''Both sensors are:''' | '''Both sensors are:''' | ||
Revision as of 02:22, 27 October 2010
| Home | Project | Applications | Modeling | Parts | Team | Notebook |
Contents |
Why Ratios?
Ratios rule the biological world, and controlling them will unlock a vast range of applications for synthetic biology.
In electrical and mechanical engineering, computers can be used to calculate a ratio from precise measurements, but biological engineering doesn't have that luxury. We need a hardwired device to compute and act on ratios independent of a controlling computer or human researcher.
The Stanford team's ratio sensors use biological machinery to eliminate the human component from ratio computation. Our output system is more efficient than two individual sensors and, most importantly, can pass its results on to other parts and devices.
Our Project: Two Designs for Ratio Detection
Our team decided to pursue two different systems for detecting ratios. After considering the scenarios in which biological engineers would want to use ratio sensors, having two specialized sensors seemed to allow greater flexibility of usage than a single design.
While both systems receive two input signals, the output they give is different, allowing them be applied in different situations. Here's a brief rundown of the two designs (you can see more by clicking through to the individual project pages).
The First Sensor:
Method: Small RNA Interference
Output: One of two possible proteins, depending on whether the ratio of input chemicals lies above or below a predetermined threshold
Useful: For reporting on a situation with a boolean output: disease detection, preterm labor warning, cancer metastasis warning
A device-level view of our sRNA system
The Second Sensor:
Method: Kinase/Phosphatase Regulation of a Transcription Factor
Output: One output protein whose concentration is linearly dependent on the ratio of the input chemicals
Useful: For acting in a situation requiring a graded response: drug delivery, metabolic flux control, detailed ratiometric reporting
A device-level view of our Kinase/Phosphatase system
Both sensors are:
- Modular: input and output molecules can be changed without affecting the interior mechanism of the device
- Orthogonal: device mechanisms are not found in E. coli, avoid crosstalk with host cell
Research
Medal Requirements
Bronze Medal
- Register the team, have a great summer, and have fun attending the Jamboree.
- Done!
- Successfully complete and submit a Project Summary form.
- Done!
- Create and share a Description of the team's project via the iGEM wiki
- Done!
- Present a Poster and Talk at the iGEM Jamboree
- Booked our plane tickets!
- Enter information detailing at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device in the Registry of Parts
- Done?
- Entered information for each new part or device should at least include primary nucleic acid sequence, description of function, authorship, any relevant safety notes, and an acknowledgement of sources and references.
- Done?
- Submit DNA for at least one new BioBrick Part or Device to the Registry of Parts.
- Done?
Silver Medal
- Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.
- Waiting for lab results...
- Characterize the operation of at least one new BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information on the Parts or Device page via the Registry of Parts
- Waiting for lab results...
Gold Medal
- Characterize or improve an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information back on the Registry.
- When sequencing one of our ligations, we noticed an unexpected sequence in our results. After more investigation, we determined that that sequence came from the Distribution part [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_E1010 BBa_E1010], and that the part sequence listed on the Parts Registry was incomplete. We have notified the Registry and made a note of this discovery on the E1010 parts experience page.
- Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
- With our Twitter project, we hope to help all iGEM teams by facilitating collaboration between teams. Read more about it here!
