Team:Stockholm/9 September 2010
From 2010.igem.org
(New page: {{Stockholm/Top2}} ==Andreas==) |
m |
||
(4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stockholm/Top2}} | {{Stockholm/Top2}} | ||
+ | |||
==Andreas== | ==Andreas== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cloning of N-CPPs into pSB1C3=== | ||
+ | Since we realized that the method we used for cloning the N-CPPs can cause also the intervening sequences to insert into pSB1C3, I decided to redo some clonings. Since the intervening sequences were designed with unique restriction sites, digestion with these endonucleases should prevent cloning of these. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Digestion of N-CPP cluster==== | ||
+ | [N-CPP plasmid] = 672 ng/μl | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Tested the FastDigest buffer, even though conventional Fermentas restriction enzymes were used.'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | {|border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | !width="50"|N-CPP | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |colspan="2" align="center"|1st incubation | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |10X FastDigest buffer | ||
+ | |align="center"|3 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |DNA (2 μg) | ||
+ | |align="center"|3 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |dH<sub>2</sub>O | ||
+ | |align="center"|19 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |XbaI (conv.) | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |AgeI (conv.) | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | !27 μl | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |colspan="2" align="center"|2nd incubation | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |FD BamHI | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |FD HindIII | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | !29 μl | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | *'''1st incubation:''' 37 °C, 2:30 | ||
+ | *'''2nd incubation:''' 37 °C, 0:30 | ||
+ | *'''Inactivation:''' 80 °C, 20 min | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Ligation==== | ||
+ | Two ligation reactions were prepared to test the efficiency of two different ligation buffers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *'''Vector:''' Dig pSB1C3 X+A EXTR (13.72 ng/μl) | ||
+ | *'''Insert:''' Dig N-CPP X+A 9/9 (31.25 ng/μl) | ||
+ | |||
+ | {|border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | !Lig pSB1C3<br />NCPP 1<br />9/9 | ||
+ | !Lig pSB1C3<br />NCPP 2<br />9/9 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |5X Rapid Ligation buf. | ||
+ | |align="center"|4 | ||
+ | |align="center"|0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |10X T4 DNA ligase buf. | ||
+ | |align="center"|0 | ||
+ | |align="center"|2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Vector DNA | ||
+ | |align="center"|4 | ||
+ | |align="center"|4 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Insert DNA | ||
+ | |align="center"|11 | ||
+ | |align="center"|11 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |dH<sub>2</sub>O | ||
+ | |align="center"|0 | ||
+ | |align="center"|2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |T4 DNA ligase | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | !20 μl | ||
+ | !20 μl | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Incubation: 22 °C, 16 min | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Digestion of previous ligation sample==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :'''Ligation mix:''' Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP* 6/9 | ||
+ | |||
+ | {|border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" | ||
+ | |Ligation mix | ||
+ | |align="center"|15 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |10X FD buffer | ||
+ | |align="center"|2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |FD BamHI | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |FD HindIII | ||
+ | |align="center"|1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | !19 μl | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Incubation: 37 °C, 30 min | ||
+ | *Inactivation: 80 °C, 15 min | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Transformations==== | ||
+ | Standard transformation protocol. | ||
+ | *3 μl ligation mix | ||
+ | **Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP 1 9/9 | ||
+ | **Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP 2 9/9 | ||
+ | **Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP * 6/9 | ||
+ | *Cm 25 plates | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Joint expression of SOD and yCCS from pEX=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Me and Mimmi were discussing the upcoming expression of SOD and its helper chaperone yCCS. Based on an article by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15358352 Ahl, Lindberg and Tibell (2004)], we decided that the two proteins should be expressed in equal amounts (1:1) from the same vector. Since we only have one expression vector (pEX) available, this requires some modifications.<br /> | ||
+ | Our idea is to construct a SOD/yCCS operon from which the two genes can be co-transcribed. This will require a new Shine-Dalgarno (RBS) sequence for translation of the second gene in the operon. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Extraction of RBS BioBrick (BBa_B0030)==== | ||
+ | Extracted BBa_B0030 (RBS 30), carried on pSB1A2, from iGEM plate 1, well 1H. Transformed into Top10. | ||
+ | *Quick transformation | ||
+ | *1 μl DNA | ||
+ | *Amp 100 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cloning of His⋅SOD into pMA=== | ||
+ | ====Sequencing results==== | ||
+ | *pMA.his.SOD_premix ([[media:PMA.his.SOD_premix_9sep.txt|fasta]]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Correct sequence verified by Blastn ([[media:Blastn_pMA.his.SOD_premix-pMA.His*SOD_9sep.txt|results]]). Three silent mutations in the His-tag, as has been previously observed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Mimmi == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === SOD.his / his.SOD / yCCS === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Plasmid prep. ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Follow E.Z.N.A protocol | ||
+ | **Wash 2x with DNA wash buffer | ||
+ | **Eluate in 50µl sH<sub>2</sub>O | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! DNA conc. | ||
+ | | ng/µl | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | pSB1C3.SOD.his | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | pSB1C3.his.SOD | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | pSB1C3.SOD.his | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Glycerol stocks ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Add 1800µl to 200µl pre-sterelized glycerol | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === MITF-M === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Site-Directed Mutagenesis ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | ! mix | ||
+ | | (µl) | ||
+ | | rowspan="9" width="100" | | ||
+ | ! primers | ||
+ | | rowspan="9" width="100" | | ||
+ | ! colspan="2" | conditions | ||
+ | | rowspan="3" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | sH<sub>2</sub>O | ||
+ | | 40 | ||
+ | | MITF_1F | ||
+ | ! time | ||
+ | ! °C | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | dNTP | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | MITF_1R | ||
+ | | 2m | ||
+ | | 95 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | F primer | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | rowspan="6" | | ||
+ | | 30s | ||
+ | | 95 | ||
+ | | ) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | R primer | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 30s | ||
+ | | 55 | ||
+ | | > 22 cycles | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Pfu buffer | ||
+ | | 5 | ||
+ | | 7m | ||
+ | | 68 | ||
+ | | ) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Pfu turbo | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | oo | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | rowspan="3" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | DNA | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | rowspan="2" | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | align="right" | tot | ||
+ | | 50µl | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Stockholm/Footer}} |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 26 October 2010
Contents |
Andreas
Cloning of N-CPPs into pSB1C3
Since we realized that the method we used for cloning the N-CPPs can cause also the intervening sequences to insert into pSB1C3, I decided to redo some clonings. Since the intervening sequences were designed with unique restriction sites, digestion with these endonucleases should prevent cloning of these.
Digestion of N-CPP cluster
[N-CPP plasmid] = 672 ng/μl
Tested the FastDigest buffer, even though conventional Fermentas restriction enzymes were used.
N-CPP | |
---|---|
1st incubation | |
10X FastDigest buffer | 3 |
DNA (2 μg) | 3 |
dH2O | 19 |
XbaI (conv.) | 1 |
AgeI (conv.) | 1 |
27 μl | |
2nd incubation | |
FD BamHI | 1 |
FD HindIII | 1 |
29 μl |
- 1st incubation: 37 °C, 2:30
- 2nd incubation: 37 °C, 0:30
- Inactivation: 80 °C, 20 min
Ligation
Two ligation reactions were prepared to test the efficiency of two different ligation buffers.
- Vector: Dig pSB1C3 X+A EXTR (13.72 ng/μl)
- Insert: Dig N-CPP X+A 9/9 (31.25 ng/μl)
Lig pSB1C3 NCPP 1 9/9 | Lig pSB1C3 NCPP 2 9/9 | |
---|---|---|
5X Rapid Ligation buf. | 4 | 0 |
10X T4 DNA ligase buf. | 0 | 2 |
Vector DNA | 4 | 4 |
Insert DNA | 11 | 11 |
dH2O | 0 | 2 |
T4 DNA ligase | 1 | 1 |
20 μl | 20 μl |
- Incubation: 22 °C, 16 min
Digestion of previous ligation sample
- Ligation mix: Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP* 6/9
Ligation mix | 15 |
10X FD buffer | 2 |
FD BamHI | 1 |
FD HindIII | 1 |
19 μl |
---|
- Incubation: 37 °C, 30 min
- Inactivation: 80 °C, 15 min
Transformations
Standard transformation protocol.
- 3 μl ligation mix
- Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP 1 9/9
- Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP 2 9/9
- Lig pSB1C3.N-CPP * 6/9
- Cm 25 plates
Joint expression of SOD and yCCS from pEX
Me and Mimmi were discussing the upcoming expression of SOD and its helper chaperone yCCS. Based on an article by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15358352 Ahl, Lindberg and Tibell (2004)], we decided that the two proteins should be expressed in equal amounts (1:1) from the same vector. Since we only have one expression vector (pEX) available, this requires some modifications.
Our idea is to construct a SOD/yCCS operon from which the two genes can be co-transcribed. This will require a new Shine-Dalgarno (RBS) sequence for translation of the second gene in the operon.
Extraction of RBS BioBrick (BBa_B0030)
Extracted BBa_B0030 (RBS 30), carried on pSB1A2, from iGEM plate 1, well 1H. Transformed into Top10.
- Quick transformation
- 1 μl DNA
- Amp 100
Cloning of His⋅SOD into pMA
Sequencing results
- pMA.his.SOD_premix (fasta)
Correct sequence verified by Blastn (results). Three silent mutations in the His-tag, as has been previously observed.
Mimmi
SOD.his / his.SOD / yCCS
Plasmid prep.
- Follow E.Z.N.A protocol
- Wash 2x with DNA wash buffer
- Eluate in 50µl sH2O