"

From 2010.igem.org

Revision as of 15:21, 23 October 2010 (view source) AndreasConstantinou (Talk | contribs) (→Andreas) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:26, 23 October 2010 (view source) AndreasConstantinou (Talk | contribs) (→Andreas) Newer edit →
Line 119:		Line 119:
	|align="center"|–		|align="center"|–
	|}		|}
		+
		+	Unfortunately no pattern seen for the different samples. It seems like something else but the protein extracts is affecting proteolysis of the secondary antibodies. Maybe the primary antibodies conjugated to the agarose is not evenly distributed. Either way, it seems like the digestion is the result of proteolysis by ''E. coli'' proteases, not overexpressed IdeS.

---

Revision as of 15:26, 23 October 2010

Andreas

IgG protease activity assay

Finished the repeated experiment and read the wavelength at 450 nm.

Blank: 80 μl PBS + 100 μl SureBlue™ peroxidase substrate + 100 μl 1 M HCl.

Sample loading
Ab dil.		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1:500	A	Ind. IgGp A		Ind. IgGp B		Ind. SOD A		Ind. SOD B		Unind. IgGp A		Unind. IgGp B
1:250	B	Ind. IgGp A		Ind. IgGp B		Ind. SOD A		Ind. SOD B		Unind. IgGp A		Unind. IgGp B
–	C	PBS 1:500	PBS 1:250	Blank	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

Results

A450 measurements
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
A	0.073	0.075	0.087	0.087	0.091	0.094	0.089	0.090	0.131	0.132	0.109	0.108
B	0.116	0.126	0.116	0.117	0.156	0.158	0.145	0.150	0.181	0.187	0.125	0.124
C	0.003	0.011	0.000	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

Unfortunately no pattern seen for the different samples. It seems like something else but the protein extracts is affecting proteolysis of the secondary antibodies. Maybe the primary antibodies conjugated to the agarose is not evenly distributed. Either way, it seems like the digestion is the result of proteolysis by E. coli proteases, not overexpressed IdeS.