Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch
From 2010.igem.org
Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
<h2>Step 2</h2> | <h2>Step 2</h2> | ||
<table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/99/DTU_step4-1.png" align="center"> | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/99/DTU_step4-1.png" align="center"> | ||
- | <caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure | + | <caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 7</b>: <i>gifsy 1</i> and <i>gifsy 2</i> are introduced in this image. <i>gifsy 1</i> codes for the anti-repressor protein responsible for preventing GogR from binding to and thereby repressing the pR1 promoter. <i>gifsy 2</i> codes for the anti-repressor protein responsible for preventing GtgR from binding to and thereby repressing the pR2 promoter.</p></caption> |
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/99/DTU_step4-1.png" width="400px"></td></tr> | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/99/DTU_step4-1.png" width="400px"></td></tr> | ||
</table><br> | </table><br> | ||
- | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9f/DTU_step5-1.png" align="center"> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 8</b>: The action of the anti-repressor protein, Gifsy 2 from the Gifsy 2 phage is illustrated. Gifsy 2 binds to repressor protein GtgR thereby preventing its repressor action. This means that GtgR is no longer able to bind to the pR2 promoter leaving the expressed GogR to bind to the pR1 promoter. <br><b>Note:</b> The strategy for the leakiness of the pRM2 promoter will be introduced in Steps 3 and 4.</p></caption> | <caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 8</b>: The action of the anti-repressor protein, Gifsy 2 from the Gifsy 2 phage is illustrated. Gifsy 2 binds to repressor protein GtgR thereby preventing its repressor action. This means that GtgR is no longer able to bind to the pR2 promoter leaving the expressed GogR to bind to the pR1 promoter. <br><b>Note:</b> The strategy for the leakiness of the pRM2 promoter will be introduced in Steps 3 and 4.</p></caption> | ||
- | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9f/DTU_step5-1.png" width="400px"></td></tr> |
</table><br> | </table><br> | ||
- | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/f0/DTU_step6-1.png" align="center"> |
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 9</b>: The action of the anti-repressor protein, Gifsy 1 from the Gifsy 1 phage is illustrated. Gifsy 1 binds to repressor protein GogR thereby preventing its repressor action. This means that GogR is no longer able to bind to the pR1 promoter leaving the expressed GtgR to bind to the pR2 promoter. <br><b>Note:</b> The strategy for the leakiness of the pRM1 promoter will be introduced in Steps 3 and 4.</p></caption> | <caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 9</b>: The action of the anti-repressor protein, Gifsy 1 from the Gifsy 1 phage is illustrated. Gifsy 1 binds to repressor protein GogR thereby preventing its repressor action. This means that GogR is no longer able to bind to the pR1 promoter leaving the expressed GtgR to bind to the pR2 promoter. <br><b>Note:</b> The strategy for the leakiness of the pRM1 promoter will be introduced in Steps 3 and 4.</p></caption> | ||
- | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/f0/DTU_step6-1.png" width="400px"></td></tr> |
</table><br> | </table><br> | ||
<h2>Step 3</h2> | <h2>Step 3</h2> | ||
- | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/61/DTU_step7-1.png" align="center"> |
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 10</b>: The nut sites from p22 and lambda phages are introduced into the construct (for theory see <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Regulatory_sytems" target="_blank" >Regulatory Systems</a>). These nut sites will contribute to the robustness of the switch as described in Step 4.</p></caption> | <caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 10</b>: The nut sites from p22 and lambda phages are introduced into the construct (for theory see <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Regulatory_sytems" target="_blank" >Regulatory Systems</a>). These nut sites will contribute to the robustness of the switch as described in Step 4.</p></caption> | ||
- | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/61/DTU_step7-1.png" width="400px"></td></tr> |
</table><br> | </table><br> | ||
<h2>Step 4</h2> | <h2>Step 4</h2> | ||
- | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/51/DTU_step8-1.png" align="center"> |
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 11</b>: The anti-terminator proteins, Gp22 and GpN are introduced. In this image, Gp22 has been expressed and by binding to the p22 nut site, it enables RNA polymerase to bypass the terminator and continue transcription. This contributes to the robustness of the bistable switch as even though the pRM1 promoter allow transcription through them. Transcription through the terminator is prevented without the presence of the anti-terminator thereby not allowing spontaneous change of states.</p></caption> | <caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 11</b>: The anti-terminator proteins, Gp22 and GpN are introduced. In this image, Gp22 has been expressed and by binding to the p22 nut site, it enables RNA polymerase to bypass the terminator and continue transcription. This contributes to the robustness of the bistable switch as even though the pRM1 promoter allow transcription through them. Transcription through the terminator is prevented without the presence of the anti-terminator thereby not allowing spontaneous change of states.</p></caption> | ||
- | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/51/DTU_step8-1.png" width="400px"></td></tr> |
</table><br> | </table><br> | ||
- | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/a1/DTU_step9-1.png" align="center"> |
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 12</b>: In this image, GpN has been expressed and by binding to the lambda nut site, it enables RNA polymerase to bypass the terminator and continue transcription. Transcription through the terminator by GpN allows continuous expression of anti-terminator as well as anti-repressor, which will keep the cell in the induced state and thereby red. Even though transcription through pRM1 is permitted and GogR is expressed, it will be derepressed by the anti-repressor thus inactivating GogR. The state is maintained and the cell emits geen light.</p></caption> | <caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 12</b>: In this image, GpN has been expressed and by binding to the lambda nut site, it enables RNA polymerase to bypass the terminator and continue transcription. Transcription through the terminator by GpN allows continuous expression of anti-terminator as well as anti-repressor, which will keep the cell in the induced state and thereby red. Even though transcription through pRM1 is permitted and GogR is expressed, it will be derepressed by the anti-repressor thus inactivating GogR. The state is maintained and the cell emits geen light.</p></caption> | ||
- | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/ | + | <tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/a1/DTU_step9-1.png" width="400px"></td></tr> |
</table><br> | </table><br> | ||
<p align="justify">In the switch design, each half switch contains a nut site followed by a terminator, as well as an antiterminator. The roles of these parts are to increase the stability of the current state of the switch. The pRM promoters are not very well repressed by the GogR/GtgR repressors and promotes transcription even in their presence. If transcription was allowed to continue to the antirepressor located on the inactive switch, the switch could change state spontaneously. The terminator ensures that this does not happen. The antiterminator of the active state is expressed, allowing continued transcription past the terminator.</p> | <p align="justify">In the switch design, each half switch contains a nut site followed by a terminator, as well as an antiterminator. The roles of these parts are to increase the stability of the current state of the switch. The pRM promoters are not very well repressed by the GogR/GtgR repressors and promotes transcription even in their presence. If transcription was allowed to continue to the antirepressor located on the inactive switch, the switch could change state spontaneously. The terminator ensures that this does not happen. The antiterminator of the active state is expressed, allowing continued transcription past the terminator.</p> |
Revision as of 10:00, 23 October 2010
Home | The Team | The Project | Parts submitted | Modelling | Notebook | Blog |
UNDER CONSTRUCTION What is a biological switch?A biological genetic switch is a system that enables cells to "remember" a state set by transient signals. This is important biologically because in cases such as differentiation of cells during development, gene regulatory systems must hold the state set during development. The simplest of such switches can be accomplished by a network of genes that regulate one another through repressor and activator protein that they encode. Natural Genetic SwitchesTemperate bacteriophages are classic examples of natural genetic switches as they have alternative life-cycles. The bacteriophages can choose between the lysogenic cycle and the lytic cycle. It should be noted that the genetic switch illustrated in Figure 1 is not a bistable switch as once the lytic cycle is induced, the lysogenic state cannot be reattained. Bistable SwitchesAs previously mentioned, the aim of our project is to design a bistable switch in E. coli. A bistable switch is Design of our Bi[o]stable SwitchThe simplest of such biological switches is one in which each of two repressor proteins represses the synthesis of the other. When both the repressor proteins are allowed to act, one of two stable states will be observed. In one steady state, the expression of repressor "one" is turned on and expression of repressor "two" is turned off. The repression of expression of repressor "two" is maintained by repressor "one", which means that the repressor "one" essentially acts as its own activator by inhibiting the expression of the repressor, repressor "two", that would repress its expression. In the other steady state, expression of repressor "two" is turned on and expression of repressor "one" is turned off. In a system where the repressors can be controlled by outside input signals such as inducers or anti-repressor proteins, the system can be forced into its other stable state. This is illustrated in Figure 2. We looked to nature for inspiration to design such a switch. The regulatory systems of the lambda phage as well as the Gifsy phages. The Gifsy phages are temperate phages found in Salmonella enterica that have an overall gene organisation typical of the lambdoid phage family (for more theory please see Regulatory Systems). Step-wise Engineering of the SwitchThe step-wise construction of our Bi[o]stable switch is demonstrated here, parts will be added to the switch as we build it up: Step 1The divergent promoters from both Gifsy1 and Gifsy2 phages are utilized in our system. The initial Gifsy1 and Gifsy2 constructs are illustrated below, Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. Step 2Step 3Step 4In the switch design, each half switch contains a nut site followed by a terminator, as well as an antiterminator. The roles of these parts are to increase the stability of the current state of the switch. The pRM promoters are not very well repressed by the GogR/GtgR repressors and promotes transcription even in their presence. If transcription was allowed to continue to the antirepressor located on the inactive switch, the switch could change state spontaneously. The terminator ensures that this does not happen. The antiterminator of the active state is expressed, allowing continued transcription past the terminator. Step 5Now that we are able to keep the switch in each state stably, we also need a means to be able to switch the state of the switch at will. To do this we introduce two input plasmids illustrated in Figure 13. The plasmids contain the antiterminators and antirepressors of each state respectively, in front of two different inducible promoters. When the plasmid corresponding to state 1 is induced, the switch is forced into state 1. This happens because the state’ s antiterminator and antirepressor are produced. The antirepressor inactivates state 2’ s repressor, resulting in increased transcription through state 1. At the same time, the antiterminator allows transcription to continue past state 1’ s terminator, where the genes for the same antirepressor and antiterminator are located. Thus, with a sufficient amount of induction, the switch will have switched states. The Final SwitchApplications of our Bi[o]stable switch |