Team:Aberdeen Scotland/Curve Fitting
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
</right> | </right> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
- | <p>Figure 5. A. Graph from paper by Witherell et al.[14] showing the binding curves of the MS2 stem loop. The filled squares are the 8-16 construct which closely resembles the binding curves of our MS2 stems. B. The binding curve for the 8-16 construct was reproduced in MATLAB and the Hill function for activators equation fitted to it (red line). </p> | + | <p font-size="10px">Figure 5. A. Graph from paper by Witherell et al.[14] showing the binding curves of the MS2 stem loop. The filled squares are the 8-16 construct which closely resembles the binding curves of our MS2 stems. B. The binding curve for the 8-16 construct was reproduced in MATLAB and the Hill function for activators equation fitted to it (red line). </p> |
</center> | </center> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 13:55, 20 October 2010
University of Aberdeen - ayeSwitch
iGEM 2010
Curve Fitting to find the Hill Coefficient for the GFP/Bbox-stem Association (n2)
Based on a graph in a paper by Witherell et al.[14] which showed the binding curves of the MS2 stem loop we could calculate more accurately the value for n1. Our two MS2 stem loops (see Fig 1 in Equations) are 19 nucleotides apart, so our binding curve will most closely resemble that of the 8-16 construct, shown in figure 5A (filled squares).
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/33/Paper_graph.png)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/c4/Reproduced_graph.png)
Figure 5. A. Graph from paper by Witherell et al.[14] showing the binding curves of the MS2 stem loop. The filled squares are the 8-16 construct which closely resembles the binding curves of our MS2 stems. B. The binding curve for the 8-16 construct was reproduced in MATLAB and the Hill function for activators equation fitted to it (red line).