Template:KIT-Kyoto/Parts1

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 23:00, 16 October 2010

We use these parts for making original biobrick parts

1.We get these parts from 2010 iGEM kit

Name	Part type	Resistance	Insert	Vector	Contents
<partinfo>pSB3k3</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_J04450</partinfo>)	Plasmid backbone	Kanamycin	738bp	2750bp	promoter(LacI) +RBS+mRFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB6A1</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_J04450</partinfo>)	Plasmid backbone	Ampicillin	738bp	4032bp	promoter(LacI) +RBS+mRFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1C3</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_J04450</partinfo>)	Plasmid backbone	Chloramphenicol	1069bp	2072bp	promoter(LacI) +RBS+mRFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_I3522</partinfo>)	Composite	Ampicillin	937bp	2079bp	promoter(TetR)+RBS+GFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_R0040</partinfo>)	Regulatory	Ampicillin	54bp	2079bp	promoter(TetR)
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_I732019</partinfo>)	Regulatory	Ampicillin	3230bp	2079bp	RBS+LacZ+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1AK3</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_I732950</partinfo>)	Protein domain	Kanamycin	3230bp	2079bp	RBS+LacZ+T+T
<partinfo>pSB4A5</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_K193602</partinfo>)	Composite	Ampicillin	1896bp	3395bp
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_E0240</partinfo>)	Protein domain	Ampicillin	883bp	2079bp	RBS+GFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_I13507</partinfo>)	Protein domain	Ampicillin	937bp	2079bp	RBS+RFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_E0420</partinfo>)	Protein domain	Ampicillin	878bp	2079bp	RBS+CFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_E0430</partinfo>)	Protein domain	Ampicillin	878bp	2079bp	RBS+YFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_I13600</partinfo>)	Composite	Ampicillin	940bp	2079bp	promoter(TetR)+RBS+CFP+T+T
<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_J22005</partinfo>)	Composite	Ampicillin	2079bp	2623bp	promoter(TetR)+RBS+YFP+T+T

2.We get this part directly from iGEM HQ

We characterize this BioBrick Part and enter the new information back on the Registry. This parts don’t include detailed information on pSB6 and the reasons leading to its usage in our work to produce GFP. In general, pSB6 is a low copy plasmid which makes it more suitable for protein production than the high copy vector. However this information cannot be found in any sites related to iGEM. Consequently, we tried to compare the performances of the low copy vector pSB1 and pSB6. We have confirmed in this way that pSB6 is more efficient at producing GFP protein than PSB1. We have thus proved that this part is very useful to evaluate the capabilities of a promoter, in this case by observing the degree of fluorescence of GFP protein. We are very thankful to the 08’Tokyo-Tech group who has supplied us with this part.

Name	Part Type	Resistance	Insert	Vector
<partinfo>pSB6A1</partinfo>(<partinfo>BBa_K121013</partinfo>)	Protein domain	Ampicillin	883bp	4022bp	RBS+GFP+T+T

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 === 2.We get this part directly from iGEM HQ ===
-We characterize this BioBrick Part and enter the new information back on the Registry. This described parts don’t include detailed information on pSB6 and the reasons leading to its usage in our work to produce GFP. In general, pSB6 is a low copy plasmid which makes it more suitable for protein production than the high copy vector. However this information cannot be found in any sites related to iGEM. Consequently, we tried to compare the performances of the low copy vector pSB1 and pSB6. We have confirmed in this way that pSB6 is more efficient at producing GFP protein than PSB1. We have thus proved that this part is very useful to evaluate the capabilities of a promoter, in this case by observing the degree of fluorescence of GFP protein. We are very thankful to the 08’Tokyo-Tech group who has supplied us with this part.
+We characterize this BioBrick Part and enter the new information back on the Registry. This parts don’t include detailed information on pSB6 and the reasons leading to its usage in our work to produce GFP. In general, pSB6 is a low copy plasmid which makes it more suitable for protein production than the high copy vector. However this information cannot be found in any sites related to iGEM. Consequently, we tried to compare the performances of the low copy vector pSB1 and pSB6. We have confirmed in this way that pSB6 is more efficient at producing GFP protein than PSB1. We have thus proved that this part is very useful to evaluate the capabilities of a promoter, in this case by observing the degree of fluorescence of GFP protein. We are very thankful to the 08’Tokyo-Tech group who has supplied us with this part.
 {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" width="750px"