Team:Yale/Our Project/Notebook/Week 7

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 113: Line 113:
<li>The AvaII bands are too faint to see really, but the SpeI and EcoRI ligations appear to show bands near 7.3, where dimers would show if they formed, suggesting that the longer ligation time may have helped.  In general though, the gel never resolved well even when the loading dye was run off the end. </li>
<li>The AvaII bands are too faint to see really, but the SpeI and EcoRI ligations appear to show bands near 7.3, where dimers would show if they formed, suggesting that the longer ligation time may have helped.  In general though, the gel never resolved well even when the loading dye was run off the end. </li>
 +
</ul>
<h4>Ligation using serial digestion products </h4>
<h4>Ligation using serial digestion products </h4>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Ethanol precipitated the sequential digest products of B0015 and phsABC from 7/20 according to the <a href=" https://2010.igem.org/Team:Yale/Our_Project/Protocols/EtOH_precipitate"> standard protocol </a>, then resuspended them each in 30 uL of pH 7.5 TE.  Nanodrop gave the resulting concentrations as still very low--12.25 ng/uL for the phsABC and 9.96 ng/uL for the B0015. </li>
 +
<li> Based on concentrations, devised the following ligation plan for the ethanol precipitated DNA </li>
 +
<b>T4 ligase control ligation </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.7 uL B0015, 14.3 uL water <br/>
 +
<b>T4 ligase 2:1 insert:vector </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.7 uL B0015, 5 uL phsABC, 9.3 uL water <br/>
 +
<b>T4 ligase 6:1 insert:vector </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.7 uL B0015, 14.8 uL phsABC <br/>
 +
<b>Quick ligase control ligation</b>--10 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL Quick ligase, 3.5 uL B0015, 6.5 uL water <br/>
 +
<b>Quick ligase 2:1 insert:vector</b>--10 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL Quick ligase, 3.5 uL B0015, 6.5 uL phsABC <br/>
<i>This day's labwork is also recorded on pages 76-78 of the hard copy lab notebook </i>
<i>This day's labwork is also recorded on pages 76-78 of the hard copy lab notebook </i>
 +
<li> Also did ligations of nonsequentially digested DNA to see if it would work, following the plan outlined below. For the phsABC tried both the gel extraction product and the PCR clean-up product, while with B0015 stuck to the not CIP-treated variety. All reactions were done using normal T4 ligase. </li>
 +
<b>control ligation </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.5 uL B0015, 14.5 uL water <br/>
 +
<b>2:1 gel extraction product </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.5 uL B0015, 4.7 uL gel extracted phsABC, 9.8 uL water <br/>
 +
<b>2:1 PCR cleanup product </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.5 uL B0015, 5.4 uL PCR clean-up phsABC, 9.1 uL water <br/>
 +
<b>6:1 gel extraction product </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.5 uL B0015, 14.5 uL gel extracted phsABC<br/>
 +
<b>6:1 PCR cleanup product </b>--2 uL ligase buffer, 1 uL T4 ligase, 2.5 uL B0015, 14.5 uL PCR clean-up phsABC <br/>
 +
Molar ratios are approximate.<br/>
 +
<li> All ligations were allowed to run overnight at 16˚C. </li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<i>This day's labwork is also recorded on pages 76-79 of the hard copy lab notebook </i>
<!------------- Wednesday ------------->
<!------------- Wednesday ------------->
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 00:03, 28 October 2010

iGEM Yale

lab notebook: week 7 (7/19-7/25)

  • Monday 7/19--Investigation of how pre-ligation processing affects ligation results
  • See more/less
  • Tuesday 7/20--Self-ligation of single phsABC digestions and serial digestion of ligation components
  • See more/less
  • Wednesday 7/21--analysis of self-ligation, tranformation of Biobrick Q04121, and set up of ligation attempt #6
  • See more/less
  • Thursday 7/22--
  • See more/less
  • Friday 7/23--
  • See more/less
  • Saturday 7/24--
  • See more/less
  • Sunday 7/25--
  • See more/less