"
Team:UPO-Sevilla/Notebook/09 09
From 2010.igem.org
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| - | <h1>September, | + | <h1>September, 9th</h1> |
<h2>Production Team</h2> | <h2>Production Team</h2> | ||
| - | <p | + | <p> In order to check PCR conditions we were going to repeat the same PCR reactions using primers enough to amplified, not only <i>fecR</i> part, else also fragments which conform it. These fragments were generated in the first overlapping PCR reaction. Also we performed these PCR reactions using like template first overlapping PCR reaction products concentrated and 1/10 diluted.</p> |
<p>We analyzed by 0,8% gel electrophoresis the PCR products and the purified products of the first overlapping PCR reaction. In this way we could check amplification and gel purification. It is shown positives only for first purified products: one of them in high quantity and the other in more little. There was not amplification, so some conditions should have failed.</p> | <p>We analyzed by 0,8% gel electrophoresis the PCR products and the purified products of the first overlapping PCR reaction. In this way we could check amplification and gel purification. It is shown positives only for first purified products: one of them in high quantity and the other in more little. There was not amplification, so some conditions should have failed.</p> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<p>We suspect that eitherthe bacterial motilities in our bacteria or the chemotaxis buffer are wrong. In next assays we’ll try to explain how this is produced and we will try to improve those results.</p> | <p>We suspect that eitherthe bacterial motilities in our bacteria or the chemotaxis buffer are wrong. In next assays we’ll try to explain how this is produced and we will try to improve those results.</p> | ||
| + | <a class="return_button" href="/Team:UPO-Sevilla/Notebook/09_08" title="Go to 8th of September"><span>Go to 8th of September</span></a> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <a class="next_button" href="/Team:UPO-Sevilla/Notebook/09_10" title="Go to 10th of September"><span>Go to 10th of September</span></a> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class="clear"></div> | ||
| + | |||
<a class="return_button" href="/Team:UPO-Sevilla/Notebook" title="Notebook"><span>Return to Notebook</span></a> | <a class="return_button" href="/Team:UPO-Sevilla/Notebook" title="Notebook"><span>Return to Notebook</span></a> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:52, 25 October 2010
September, 9th
Production Team
In order to check PCR conditions we were going to repeat the same PCR reactions using primers enough to amplified, not only fecR part, else also fragments which conform it. These fragments were generated in the first overlapping PCR reaction. Also we performed these PCR reactions using like template first overlapping PCR reaction products concentrated and 1/10 diluted.
We analyzed by 0,8% gel electrophoresis the PCR products and the purified products of the first overlapping PCR reaction. In this way we could check amplification and gel purification. It is shown positives only for first purified products: one of them in high quantity and the other in more little. There was not amplification, so some conditions should have failed.
Assembly Team
We did not observed colonies in any plate. We analyzed the digestion products by agarose-gel electrophoresis, and everything seemed to be all right.
Assay Team
Eventually the assay was an unqualified failure and we didn’t achieve any positive result. We should study why it has happened and change some things to adjust properly the assay.
We suspect that eitherthe bacterial motilities in our bacteria or the chemotaxis buffer are wrong. In next assays we’ll try to explain how this is produced and we will try to improve those results.
Go to 8th of September Go to 10th of September Return to Notebook
Sponsors
