"
Team:UPO-Sevilla/Biobricks/Devices
From 2010.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
<h2>Device 10. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | <h2>Device 10. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | ||
<img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/de/BacterialCrowdingDevice10.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 10"/> | <img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/de/BacterialCrowdingDevice10.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 10"/> | ||
| - | <p><strong>Notes:</strong></p> | + | <p><strong>Notes:</strong> Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for <i>E. coli</i>. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.</p> |
<h2>Device 11. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | <h2>Device 11. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | ||
<img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/d2/BacterialCrowdingDevice11.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 11"/> | <img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/d2/BacterialCrowdingDevice11.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 11"/> | ||
| - | <p><strong>Notes:</strong></p> | + | <p><strong>Notes:</strong> Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for <i>E. coli</i>. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.</p> |
<h2>Device 12. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | <h2>Device 12. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | ||
<img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/fd/BacterialCrowdingDevice12.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 12"/> | <img class="device" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/fd/BacterialCrowdingDevice12.png" alt="Bacterial Crowding Device 12"/> | ||
| - | <p><strong>Notes:</strong></p> | + | <p><strong>Notes:</strong> Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for <i>E. coli</i>. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.</p> |
<h2>Device 13. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | <h2>Device 13. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender</h2> | ||
Revision as of 10:09, 11 September 2010
Devices
Device 1. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 2. Type: protein generator
Notes: We decided not to build this divice due to the fact that it already exists in E. coli K12 strain.
Device 3. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 4. Type: protein generator
Notes:
Device 5. Type: reporter
Notes:
Device 6. Type: reporter
Notes:
Device 7. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 8. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 9. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 10. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 11. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 12. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes: Finally we chose aspartate like the best attractant for E. coli. This is why Glutamate Synthase divices were not going to continue building.
Device 13. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 14. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 15. Type: Protein generator/Signal sender
Notes:
Device 16. Type: Constitutive protein generator/reporter
Notes:
Sponsors
