Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Material Methods/Measurements/Tecan/test27settembre
From 2010.igem.org
m (→RESULTS) |
m (→RESULTS) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
[[Image:UNIPV_Pavia_SScellM27settembre.png|thumb|500px |center|Mean of (dGFP/dt)/O.D.600 (under the hypothesis that half-life of GFP is longer than experiment observation)]] | [[Image:UNIPV_Pavia_SScellM27settembre.png|thumb|500px |center|Mean of (dGFP/dt)/O.D.600 (under the hypothesis that half-life of GFP is longer than experiment observation)]] | ||
- | All cell cultures showed a similar growth curve and doubling time was computed as described [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts/Characterization#Doubling_time_evaluation|here]] in order to have informations about the burden due to synthesis of such fusion proteins. It's possible to see | + | All cell cultures showed a similar growth curve and doubling time was computed as described [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts/Characterization#Doubling_time_evaluation|here]] in order to have informations about the burden due to synthesis of such fusion proteins. It's possible to see that all doubling time are very similar; it's possible to assert that the expression of these BioBrick parts doesn't cause stress to the cells. |
+ | |||
In GFP curve it's possible to appreciate that in I47, I48, I49 GFP accumulation it's very similar and it's significantly different from that of negative control <partinfo>BBa_B0031</partinfo>. | In GFP curve it's possible to appreciate that in I47, I48, I49 GFP accumulation it's very similar and it's significantly different from that of negative control <partinfo>BBa_B0031</partinfo>. | ||
Revision as of 00:24, 24 October 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|