Team:UIUC-Illinois/Meeting Minutes

From 2010.igem.org

Revision as of 16:00, 5 July 2010 by Eborcha2 (Talk | contribs)

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Most recent at top of page.

Contents

5/28/10

Presentation of what we did in lab this week:

'Things to note for later:

take pictures of plates on a piece of white paper.

Dr. Jin has a dark reader which may be useful for viewing fluorescent colonies.

change contrast on gel picture to see bands better.

have Courtney show us how to manipulate pictures of our gel on the gel reader.

label columns in kinetics results.

Use different dilutions for kinetics readings too.

open wetware for colony PCR procedure.

tricks to clean up the fluorescence:

use cells without fluorescence as a control

spin down, re-suspend in PBS if not getting strong signal.

'Research:

Possible directions:

1. Super metal-resistant cell

2. Magnetosomes—Dr. Rao not a fan. Can’t just stick a plasmid in to get it to work.

3. Metal Immobilization

4. Metal mobilization

Working on metal resistant cell for now since it’s a prereq for everything else we would want to do with metals.

challenges with metal systems: Dr. Rao tried to activate fer with iron but never able to do so. LB isn’t gonna work, going to have to use minimal media, chelate treat to pull out ions. Have to make sure there aren’t any metals around. Most not active at high concentrations of metal. Chelating agent in media to keep it from the cell.

try to find salmonella counterparts of the genes in e.coli

ZntA expressed by one of Dr. Jin’s grad student and it works to export zinc. Exports lead and copper too. Just express a few efflux pumps and it should be pretty resistant to most metals.

People to talk to:

Dianne Newman—looking for a mechanism of 3-4 genes to clone

mutagenize e.coli, grow on metal until something that survives. Chop up DNA, put it on plasmids, transform, see which lives, that’s the one with the metal resistant gene.

Metals research: design primers

Megan: cadmium or mercury

Tom: gold

Matt: nickel

Steve: zinc

Bob: Copper

Amanda: Lead

Erin: Arsenic

Francis: Silver

Meeting with tools team:

group to build strain designer, group to improve imptools.

simvector4—plasmid design

Modeling with tools team: 9-12 Thursday morning

Abstract due june 18th for chemical and biological defense science and technology conference if we want to do it.

wetlab: meetings with advisors Fridays at 11:00 am.

tools: tentative, meetings with advisors Friday at 9:30 am.

both teams: Meetings Friday 2:30 pm

12:00 Monday barbeque

5/27/10

Bootcamp Day 4

Modeling:

BCCS Bristol won best modeling—mostly a tools team. Modeled interactions between cells and stuff going on inside of cells. Delivery of particles, interactions, etc. also included a user manual

https://2009.igem.org/Team:BCCS-Bristol

atomic dipole transition: http://www.falstad.com/qmatomrad/

michaelis menten kinetics—models the rate of the reaction. Velocity and substrate concentration. Type of inhibition.

Henderson Hasselbach equation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson%E2%80%93Hasselbalch_equation

Last year’s Modeling:

Looking at the construct and gene expression/repression vs time or concentration of IPTG. Levels of mRNA, protein etc.

Matlab Simbiology

An Introduction to Systems Biology by Yuri Alon. Book to find some modeling stuff.

Bioethics:

handouts on Bioethics. Phrases, wording to use with the general public in presentations.

one concern is bioterror

Obama wrote a letter asking for six month analysis of synthetic biology.

during public outreach highlight differences between synthetic biology and genetic engineering

discussion:

book—how to defeat your own clone. By kurpinski and Johnson.

how to regulate synthetic biology

nanotech—picked up by the industry really quickly so the general public is pretty much just trusting the industry in this area. We don’t really understand how it reacts with out biology.

what kind of effects, how dangerous is a synthetically created organism?

bioterror, bioerror

microcosm—by Zimmer. book on all the advances we’ve gained using e.coli and a few other. Also mentions iGEM.

Concerns—getting in environment, bioterror, god/religion.

Other Info:

GAMES camp. Engineering girls camp. High school week, middle school week. July 30th, (Friday) 9:45-10:30. August 13th 9:45-10:30. Talk for about a half hour, have a hands on activity, something they can take away with them.

Orpheum childrens science Museusm—really need a hands on thing if we do this.

Surrounded by Science--David Leake, tv show from parkland college. Person in charge wants to make sure that there’s something in it for them too. Film us doing stuff, but we would also do some kind of outreach thing at parkland. could we have some kind of bioethics discussion if it’s a seminar of some sort?

Memorial Day—barbeque, sand volleyball, waterballoon fight? Illini grove?

ThermoFischer might get us some funding!

For the meeting tomorrow: who would be able to be the public relations team to present at GAMES camp and things like that. Anna, Amanda, Erin.

5/26/10

Bootcamp Day 3

Synthetic biology

“engineering microbial ‘polka dots’ toward synthetic biology”:

Synthetic biology uses only sequence info in order to implement an objective biological system. Biological systems engineering employs and modifies naturally existing biological systems in order to make them behave as intended. iGEM tends to fall into the biological systems engineering category since we take existing parts and put them together rather than coming up with a sequence.

System design:

Parts vs device vs system

ie: radio vs radio+speakers.

protein vs multiple proteins (ie: repressors) to create an inverter vs multiple interacting inverters.

Principles in biological systems engineering:

1. Abstraction—provide a big picture without detailed characteristics of the intended system (part, device and system)

2. Standardization—enable interfacing among parts, devices, and systems. Predictable/reproducible performance. (we don’t have to worry about this so much since most of what we use is in biobrick format)

3. Decoupling—efficient way to deal with complexity. Getting rid of interference. Considering other effects of utilization of the metals

4. What devices are needed for the system. Think about what existing devices to couple with the devices we want to make.

5. Connect the devices needed.

6. Implementation, detailed design of parts needed. What promoter, RBS, terminator do we want to use? What kind of regulation?

7. Part level system configuration—how all the parts interact in the system.

8. Synthesis, compilation, DNA layout, sequence information.

9. Debugging the system. Looking at each part, testing if it works in the system, where something might have gone wrong if it’s not working. Individually test each part in the device by putting GFP downstream to receive output from each element and manually introduce input signal.

10. Final output and sequence information.

Intial simple modeling: Think about where the system will fail. Metal toxicity, low transcription/translation activity.

Make sure to provide good documentation of our device. Don’t necessarily have to get everything working.

Plan out objectives for the summer, steps for achieving the goal.

Research topics:

1. Metal resistance

2. Magnetosomes

3. Metal mobilization

4. Metal immobilization

Wiki Editing:

upload picture to profile, update profile.

5/25/10

Bootcamp Day 2

Primer Design

PCR: amplifies double stranded DNA. Usually given positive strand (5’-3’) by databases. PCR consists of heating, cooling. Heating causes the strands to separate, allowing primers to bind. Primers are specific to a specific sequence (oligo’s of DNA). Primers bind during annealing step, then extend around 72 C. during extension, polymerase extends 5’-3’.

Basic Design: 1. Primer aka oligo. Single stranded piece of DNA, order it from a company. Want the primer to be about 20 bp long (length of complementarity). The shorter, the cheaper.

2. 3’ GC clamp. GC has 3 H bonds holding it together, AT has 2 H bonds (so AT is a weaker binding than GC). Want the tightest interaction of the primer binding the DNA to be at the 3’ end because this is where elongation is going to proceed from.

5’-ACTG-3’

3’-TGAC-5’

3. Melting temp (Tm) greater than or equal to 60 degrees C. The higher the better.

CG 4 degrees C

AT 2 degrees C

so if a 20-mer, 20*4 means melting temp around 80 degrees for an entirely GC 20-mer.

Microbesonline.org—has every microbial genome sequences. Can find a gene in an organism. After inputting the organism and searching a gene, click gene for gene information. click the sequences tab for the amino acid sequence and coding sequence in FASTA format.

ie: CheV gene from Bacillus Subtilis. TTGTCGTTACAACAATACGAAATTTTATTGGATTCTGGTACAAATGAATTAGAAATTGTG AAGTTTGGCGTGGGTGAAAATGCTTTCGGAATTAACGTCATGAAGGTAAGAGAAATTATT CAGCCTGTCGAGGTGACATCAGTGCCTCACTCCCATCAGCATGTAGAAGGAATGATTAAA CTCAGAGGAGAAATCCTCCCTGTGATCAGTCTCTTCTCATTTTTTGGAGTAGAGCCTGAA GGATCAAAAGATGAGAAATATATCGTGACTGAATTTAATAAACGGAAAATTGTTTTTCAT GTCGGCTCTGTTTCTCAAATTCACAGAGTATCCTGGGAAGCGATTGAAAAGCCGACATCG TTAAATCAAGGAATGGAGCGGCACCTTACCGGTATTATTAAGCTCGAAGACCTGATGATC TTTTTGCCTGACTATGAAAAAATTATTTATGACATTGAATCAGATTCAGGTGTTGACACG TATAATATGCATACCGAGGGCTTCGATGAAAGAAGAACTGATAAAAAGCTTATCATTGTA GAGGACTCACCGCTTTTGATGCGCCTCTTGCAGGATGAATTAAAAGAAGCAGGGTACAAC AATATCGCTTCGTTTGAAAATGGAAAAGAGGCATATGAATACATTATGAACCTTGCTGAA AACGAAACTGATTTATCAAAACAGATTGATATGATCATCACTGATATTGAAATGCCAAAA ATGGACGGACACAGGCTCACAAAGCTGCTGAAGGAAAATCCGAAAAGCTCAGATGTGCCG GTTATGATTTTCTCATCGTTAATTACGGATGATCTGCGTCACCGCGGCGAAGTTGTAGGC GCAGATGAGCAAATCAGCAAGCCTGAGATCAGTGATTTGATTAAAAAAGTGGATACGTAT GTTATTGAATAA

Forward Primer:

anneals to the first 18-25 bp of the sequence on the complementary strand (3’-5’, minus strand), matches the first 18-25 of the positive strand.

positions for GC clamp

TTGTCGTTACAACAATACG

Tm: 7 GC (7*4=28)

      12 AT (12*2=24)  
      28+24=52 degrees C

Reverse Primer:

anneals to positive strand, reverse compliment of the strand it’s binding to.

AATTCCGG  CCGGAATT

(+ 5’-3’)GGATACGTATGTTATTGAATAA  TTATTCAATAACATACGTATCC

Tm: 6 GC (6*4=24)

       16 AT (16*2=32)
       32+24=56 degrees C

Go to IDT website, DNA synthesis, custom DNA oligos. Order the smallest amount of DNA. Standard desalting purification. Copy in sequence into sequence box, give it a name.

enter primers into googledoc

NB: Using courier font makes the spacing of all the characters equal.

Primer Extension

Restriction Enzymes for biobricks: PstI, SpeI, EcoRI, XbaI

make sure the gene doesn’t have the cut sites in that we’re using—NEB cutter, http://tools.neb.com/NEBcutter2/ enter in FASTA format. Tells you all the cut sites in the gene. Click link for 0 cutters to see which enzymes won’t cut in your gene. These are the enzymes you can use for biobrick assembly.

adding restriction enzyme sites to our primers. Adds restriction sites to our PCR product. Don’t want to go above 50bp total for primer length (20 bp for binding, 30 for restriction site). Always add to the 5’ end.

EcoRI—GATTC

SpeI—ACTAGT

    Forward: GAATTC+primer sequence+some extra bases to help the site work.  ATCGGAATTCTTGTCGTTACAACAATACG
    Reverse: ACTGACTAGTTTATTCAATAACATACGTATCC

Designing a biobrick

need ribosome binding site—generally AGGAGG, 8-12 bases upstream of the ATG (start codon). Take 20 bp from upstream of a well expressed gene to use as RBS. Ex: CheY is well expressed.

20 bp upstream of CheY is atttaaaataacgaaacacaaggagagagatagatt


atttaaaataacgaaacacaaggagagagatagatt—ATG—CheV—TAA—TAA (2 stop codons just in case)

Forward:

ATCGGAATTCatttaaaataacgaaacacaaggagagagatagattATGTCGTTACAACAATACG (changed TTG to ATG at beginning of coding sequence for better RBS)

Reverse: added additional stop codon

ACTGACTAGTTTATTATTCAATAACATACGTATCC

Point Mutations:

Quickchange—start with a methylated plasmid. 2 primers that mind over the base pair you want to change with the only difference being at the bp to change. PCR , treat with DpnI (4 bp cutter for methylated DNA). Leaves us with only unmethylated, altered DNA. Can’t use Taq pol, have to use purified primers.

Enzyme inverse PCR

Primer3: does calculations for you, designs primers for you. http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/


NCBI—can search for entire genomes:

Ptt file—gives you ever gene in a genome in standard form.

fna file—sequence of genome.

gbk file—references, updates, amino acid sequence, genome sequence in block format.

Colibri: can type in gene name, get info, sequence separated by codon and user defined upstream, downstream regions.

5/24/10

Bootcamp Day 1

Weekly fundraiser:

ideas: T-shirts, Puppy chow, recycling printer cartridges, donate plasma…organs…, car wash, make a band, pizza sales, grilled cheese.

Positions:

keeping track of lab hours: spreadsheet on google docs, input number of hours and at the end of the week, a couple of sentences about what you did that week. Also a sheet of paper in the lab to sign in and sign out.

goals, structure:

weekly meetings with the professors on Friday

be done with decoder by second week of June, have it tested, modeled by end of June.

submit project description by June

submit abstract by August

spend next 2.5 weeks figuring everything out, research, design project. Sequences we’ll need for each plasmid in the metals project.

for full timeline, see googledoc.


lab notebooks—record keeping, wiki editing

keeping the notebook: keeping notes in triplicates—in-lab notebook in as much detail as possible. Lab notebook needs EVERYTHING. As much info as possible. Title, procedure, materials, date, time, initial at bottom. Kit used, concentration, etc. Label every lane in the gels. Always take a picture of the gel, put it in the in lab notebook. Save a copy on the computer. In your own notebook, format however you want, general notes. Notes will also be kept on the wiki, daily log. Not very extensive, but general info. Ie: I did a transformation today, it worked, or it didn’t work.

wiki: Matt types the info from the in-lab notebook into the wiki.

Past iGEM projects:

Metals: Denmark 2009, cornell 2009—cadmium sensor in bacillus, Groningen 2009—cell that accumulated arsenic, floated when arsenic present,Newcastle 2009—bacillus cadmium sensing, and gate, metallothionein binds cationic metal ions, Seoul 2009—promoters for different metals, Tokyo Tech 2009—iron oxidizing bacteria, takes iron ore, brings into cell, UQ Australia 2009—take a look at this one, Used e. coli to take up mercury, thave the pathway mapped out, good documentation, also did something with bioprecipitation, Virginia 2009—Arsenic accumulation, Imperial 2008, LCG UNAM Mexico 2008,METU Turkey 2008,Prarieview 2008,St. Petersberg 2007, Brown 2007, MIT 2007, Prarieview 2007, Turkey 2007, Edinburgh 2006, Latin America 2006

RNA: British Columbia 2009, Bologna 2009, Victoria BC 2009, Alberta 2008, KLeuven 2008, TUDelft 2008, Virginia 2008, Berkeley 2006

groups: half on decoder, half on metals. Matt, Steve, Francis, Bob on small RNAs. Amanda, Tom, Meagan, Erin on metals.

use transcription factors and small RNAs to make the decoder work.

Other notes:

everyone gets 2 weeks vacation.

synthesizing vs. cloning genes out:

build a schematic of what we want to do.

need transporter protein, metal chelator/sequesterer.

gold and silver—not finding a lot of info. May have to make the pathway ourselves. Expensive

Mercury—past iGEM project

Iron—easy

Nickle

In lab procedure:

miniprep—biobrick number on top of tube, date, concentration on the side of the tube. Initials if room. digestion with restriction enzymes. See online instructions from gingobioworks website. Make sure to add enzymes last.

incubate

ligation—add ligase last.

incubate

transformation (electroporation)

Selection

Assays

Miniprep and colony PCR

Put parts in registry as practice.

Find something to reduce or oxidize a species

4/28/10

Decoder to detect concentration range—above/below limits assign 1 or 0. Can use decoder to tell what range of concentration you’re in. if in normal range, no response. If upper range, produce insulin or something. If below, promote gluconeogenisis.

Biomineralization: Silver-metal alloys not from e.coli but from organism physiologically similar to e. coli. Relatively characterized. Should work since they’re similar organisms. Works for decoder if we can get alloys to work. Doesn’t exploit RNA part of decoder. RNA produces quick response. Bring metal in, chelate it, reduce it, complex it, determine extracellular location. Probably need 1 porin for each metal.

Biosurfactants: part of crude oil refinery. Changes the hydrophobicity of the area of the cell. Used for heavy metal crystallization, gold. bioemulsifiers. Work for a bunch of stuff. Surfactant: absorb at surfaces by modifying chemical interactions. Basically detergents, ie: soap. Emulsifier: makes oil and water mix. Important in mining and oil. Lots of uses in industry. Lots of material, information. two systems—biosurfactant, bioemulsifier. Make cell that produces these. All cells have these properties to some degree. Heavy metal removal from sediments with biosurfactants. Project would be using biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers for oil refining, possible biomineralization. Used to purify components in oil spills. Surfactants enhance solubilization. Inhibits corrosion. Quantum dots: organisms produce specific crystallized metals, put to membrane, “green” way of producing crystals for nanotechnology. Nothing with any characterization.

Decision: Biomineralization applied to decoder


4/25/10

Need to define project!!

Oil:

Benzo[a]pyrene—one bacteria can degrade it if they have a second source of energy.

Emulsification—increase surface area for oil degredation. Lots of current focus in this area.

Also trying to develop fertilizers for bioremediation of oil—contain nitrogen and phosphate, emulsifiers to help the bacteria degrade oil.

Usually quorum dependent secretion of emulsifiers

Keywords: oil bioremediation, oil bioaugmentation,Aromatics, aliphatic hydrocarbon chains.

Most bacteria can only degrade a select few, not a variety of compounds. Aromatic rings are carcinogenic.

Metals:

One of the problems with metals is that it’s difficult to clone out the necessary components—lots of things needed to make it work. Sulfur iron clusters in many of the proteins, many enzymes going into making the actual cluster which is the catalytic core of the enzyme. Metals usually as terminal electron acceptor—involved in electron transport chain, use lots of cytochromes which are different in all organisms. You’d need to get all the cytochromes too to make the pathway work.

One pathway, reduces selenium, uses a few enzymes, only three to construct the reductase. Pathway completely mapped out.

A lot of secretion, biominerilization occurs outside the cell. Some organisms can do this inside the cell—requires less enzymes, but hard to amass them into large quantities. But could sonicate cells to release the metals.

Quantum Dots: related to semi-conductors. Nanocrystals of different metals, conductive properties based on the molecular arrangement of the crystals. Used for nano-technology. Grouping electrons to use for “quantum computing”.

E.coli can reduce gold.

Other stuff:

Send in some grants, submitting project proposal sometime this week. We’re going to stay with the decoder but find some application if possible.

Meeting Wednesday night, 20 min, officially have a project. 9:30, RSO.


4/23/10

Summer meetings, bootcamp overview (already covered in previous team meeting)

Metals: May not be as easy of just transplanting the pathway—secrete cytochromes to grab the metal, shuttling system. Check pathways, could be difficult.

Maybe looking at oil—oil had different compositions, increase efficiency to degrade only what’s in the specific spill. Oil classified by sulfur and viscosity—find something that’s Sulfur sensitive.

Documentary possibly—I think I may have missed some info on this?

Biosafety: which strains (DH5a), safety precautions, emergency contacts (mckinley). Basically listing what you’re working with. finish hopefully before we get into bootcamp week.

Competition: nov. 5th-7th MIT, planning on 2 advisors coming as of now, Courtney, Dr. Rao.

IGB access: 9-5 can get in no problem, no need for prox card. Has to be someone here if we’re here at night, we can’t be alone in the lab. Not likely that’d we’d get afterhours access. Weekend, keep it within normal hours, 12-6ish.

Oil has bigger implications—industries looking for ways to take care of oil. Look into aromatics, alkanes, alkenes, paraffin, olefin, biodegradation.

Get the decoder to work!

Build each detector separately, put into one system at the end.


4/21/10

Biomineralization metal sensing, instead of a promoter, precipitate the metal. Short pathways. Pathways that detoxify. 4-5 enzymes per metal pathway. Sensing stuff in registry. Inputs are soluble metals.

Nanofabrication.

How could it help people: precipitated form is non-toxic, while soluble is toxic.

Input: soluble metal, pick out clump of dirt on the quad, has soluble metal.

Really marketable, direct application, no human testing.

There’s metal everywhere, don’t need a lot to do this.

Decoder: if gold, pathway to precipitate gold. If silver inputs, precipitate both. Etc.

meeting with advisors friday, 12:00 third floor, north side conference room IGB.

4/16/10

Project proposals:

1. Matt, Steve, Bob:

Bacterial Thermo-regulator:

Get bacteria to maintain homeostasis in fluctuating external temperature

Introduce genes coding for temperature sensitive genes or RNA to act as promoters to start a process to release a large amount of heat.

Applications: for high temp. microbes, applications to thermophiles in industrial applications, central heating, anywhere heat is used.

Problems: enzyme stability—reduction of Nitrous oxide. Does it diffuse into cells? How do we get it into cells? Metabolic rate?

cspA mRNA changes conf. at low temp. (temperature sensitive RNA). Responds to cold shock. Cis regulator. Changes secondary structure depending on the temp. of the environment. Check Kyoto project—wanted bacteria to raise temp. of mars so life could be maintained.

N2O reduction—released 82.05 kJ/mol, only need one enzyme (nitrous oxide reductase).

Feasibility: strength of the promoter would have to coincide well with metabolic rate, trial and error to find right balance.

Cooling: to maintain homeostasis, would need to find way to cool the bacteria. Maybe reverse the process we’d be using to generate heat. Require another set of genes, promoter. Heat sensitive lambda promoter in registry. Exocytosis to cool the cell, similar to how mammals maintain homeostasis, sweating.

Insulator—capsule?

Comments: e.coli has advanced heat shock system. Many proteins to stabilize, involves mRNA. Cold just slowing down rate of reactions. Hard to get bacterial density up in a solution to generate enough heat. Possible spin to try to evolve a thermophilic version of e.coli, then sequence genomes. But there wouldn’t really be a biobrick.

Insulator/capsule under temperature dependent promoter is feasible.

Evolution at specific temperatures.

2. Amanda, Meagan:

Multiple contaminant whole cell biosensor in e.coli

Builds off bacterial decoder from last year

Water contamination techniques. Detection techniques today are not always reliable.

whole cell biosensor: sensing component (usually resistance gene) reporter gene.

biosensors have been done in the past but only single input and single output. Ours would take multiple inputs to give an output based on the input.

arsenic, lead.

ars operon—resistance gene, pump to pump out arsenic. Couple it to a reporter gene

pbrr—protein that binds selectively to lead ions. Clones into e.coli before so feasible.

theoretically simple, practical application of last year’s project.

problems: need to make it more sensitive than it is in nature for the ars operon. Not entirely sure what the products of the ars operon are. Don’t know much about lead sensing component. Need appropriate inputs, research what compounds are in water, what’s feasible to detect.

past projects: the traffic light project—altered promoter such that it’s stronger or weaker than wild type. Possible way to sense different levels of contaminants. We could alter ars promoter in similar way.

increasing sensitivity.

Comments: not exactly a true application of last year’s decoder, maybe have it detect something beneficial vs something dangerous like ars. Or make a degrader instead for endocrine disrupters or estrogen. Pathogen contamination, parasites.

Didn’t get anything for synthetic RNA project b/c I was presenting

Post-presentation comments:

Synthetic RNA—easy to manipulate but not necessarily an effective regulator. No real definite application. Continuing the decoder: we’d have to find a direct application, something that needs to be decoded. Or maybe even just get it to work since we have the parts. New inputs/outputs. Degrade contaminants.

We chose the decoder!

Think of what we can add to it, what we can decode, degradation of estrogen and endocrine disrupters. Still gonna use small RNA, 2 to 4 decoder


4/11/10

Meeting with advisors to present project proposals Friday 5:00-6:30. Possibly a professional picture 4:45 for the brochure.

Francis went over project proposal research. See the googledoc for comments.

Top three projects to present: Thermoregulator

Arsenic/lead detector

Engineering Posttranscriptional regulation in prokaryotes

Additional research throughout the week on these projects.


What's Going on this week:

Thursday: Undergraduate Research Symposium 1:30-2:45 Pine Lounge in the Union

Friday: Meeting with Advisors 12:00-1:00, Igb fellows symposium 3:30-4:45, Professional Picture 4:45, Project Meeting 5:00-6:30.

see the google calendar for more info

4/10/10

General:

Spark—Old article and contacts, but still reachable

MCB Open House—Next week

Undergraduate Research Symposium—Next week

Lab:

Moved into 3500 IGB

We’ll just buy glassware—we can get what we need as we need it

Project Overviews with advisors

Meeting next Friday—Team picture at 4:45, meeting 5-6:30

Grants

Company Contact List—adding non-profit organizations

3/19/10

Meeting with advisors

One advisor said something about iGEM for regional advisors meeting for proposal. Courtney had meeting with ihotel for planning—rooms, dates. We may have to host dinner, possibly at IGB. We have to come up with a portion of the funds. Needs list of team member’s school affiliation. Tentative schedule: First night cocktail party, dinner. Conference at iHotel. We pretty much just pay for food. First day box lunch, possible dinner. Sunday, offer breakfast, people leave. Estimating 100 people attending. Maybe poster session highlighting IGB work, vendor show (vendors pay to participate, location source of funding for iGEM!).

Maybe the union as an option, visitors can walk around campus. Hampton out by Beckman.

We were given 500 dollars to come up with cooperate brochure. Who we are, description of research, donation possibilities.

We may need new space if our current space gets taken. Possible use of training lab. If we go with training lab, we’ll have to find equipment list. Ie: pipette sets, power supply, thermocycler, tabletop centrifuge, hot plate, glassware, gel boxes. Maybe borrow stuff from senior design lab from bioengineering.

Put together list of supplies that we need donated. We can ask around to see what we can get donated.

Lab training sessions early may or late june with prof. Rao. Courtney may be able to do some lab training in a couple weeks as well.

Advisor Availability this summer: Daycare on campus closes for 2 weeks in summer, so Courtney won’t be here then. Prof. Rao: june will be on and off Prof. Jin: Second and third week of june out of town. Prof. Manaster has to look stuff up, she’ll get back to us. prof. Rao wants some of our smelly e. coli. Credit Hours possibility—possibly getting fall credit for summer work so tuition isn’t an issue. Probably 4 hours of credit.


PDFs:

4.9.10

3.14.10

2.16.10

Powerpoints:

5.28.10

4.23.10

4.18.10

4.2.10

3.28.10

3.19.10

3.2.10

2.2.10