Team:TU Delft/project/rbs characterization

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(RBS Characterization)
(Removing all content from page)
 
(20 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
=RBS Characterization=
 
-
For our RBS characterization project, 5 different RBS sequences from the [http://partsregistry.org/Ribosome_Binding_Sites/Prokaryotic/Constitutive/Anderson Anderson RBS family] (J61100, J61101, J61107, J61117, J61127) and one known RBS ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0032 B0032]) where placed in front of GFP and measured over 18 hours using a Gen5 fluorenscence and absorbance plate reader.
 
-
The general map of the construction is shown below, where the RBS is displayed in fucsia.
 
-
{|
 
-
[[Image:RBS1.jpg|center]]
 
-
[[Image:26_07_2010_Rbs.png|center]]
 
-
 
-
{|
 
-
Strength was calculated by taking the mean of the ratio between the expression of known RBS ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0032 B0032]) and expression of Anderson RBS over some time. Expression being the measured fluorescence divided by measured biomass (absorbance, OD).
 
-
 
-
The measurements where taken from the part of the curve where optimal growth can be assumed, so from 0:40 until 2:30
 
-
The result is a simple characterization of the Anderson RBS sequences in relation to the known RBSes. The given strengths are given in comparison with the iGEM RBS standard [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0034 B0034].
 
-
{| style="color:black; background-color:white;" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="center"
 
-
|'''RBS'''
 
-
|'''Strength'''
 
-
|-
 
-
|[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J61100 J61100]
 
-
|0.047513
 
-
|-
 
-
|[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J61101 J61101]
 
-
|0.119831
 
-
|-
 
-
|[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J61107 J61107]
 
-
|0.065454
 
-
|-
 
-
|[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J61117 J61117]
 
-
|0.038518
 
-
|-
 
-
|[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J61127 J61127]
 
-
|0.087334
 
-
|-
 
-
|[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0032 B0032]
 
-
|0.300000
 
-
|}
 
-
 
-
We've also looked at mRNA folded shapes using mfold to see if there was a common pattern in the Anderson RBS shapes. This might have been usable in predicting RBS strength for the other untested Anderson RBS sequences. Unfortunately, this didn't seem to be the case, as all the tried RBS sequences had very different mfold shapes.
 

Latest revision as of 13:58, 14 October 2010