# Team:St Andrews/project/modelling/models/RK4

### From 2010.igem.org

(→Mathematical basis: minor typo correction) |
|||

Line 16: | Line 16: | ||

[[Image:Runge kutta eqns.jpg]] | [[Image:Runge kutta eqns.jpg]] | ||

+ | |||

+ | '''Figure 1: Runge-Kutta equations''' | ||

Line 40: | Line 42: | ||

[[Image:Picture 4.png|600px]] | [[Image:Picture 4.png|600px]] | ||

+ | '''Figure 2: Runge-Kutta technique''' | ||

=Implementation= | =Implementation= | ||

The code which performs the operations in the Runge-Kutta algorithm is shown below. | The code which performs the operations in the Runge-Kutta algorithm is shown below. |

## Latest revision as of 02:02, 28 October 2010

# Differential Solver (RK4)

## Contents |

# Introduction

Our method of solving differential equations is based on Fourth Order Runge-Kutta Method. This technique is the most widely used way of numerically solving differential equations and various methods of implementation were looked at. Most of our coding has been based on the work of Aberdeen 2009 iGEM team who used the same method in their modelling. We would like to thank the team for their work and making it available to others like us for future use.

# Mathematical basis

While the strict mathematical derivation of the Runge-Kutta method is available (see here for details ), we omit it here and instead give a brief explanation of the principles behind the technique.

There are several key formulae in the Fourth Order Runge-Kutta algorithm, which are:

**Figure 1: Runge-Kutta equations**

The iteration of the x-values is done very simply adding a fixed step-size (h) at each iteration, thus resulting in a constant increase in the x-value according to the value of h chosen for a particular purpose.

The y-value iteration contains a much more elegant set of relationships. It should be clear to you that the y-iteration formula is in fact a weighted average of the four value k values, k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3} and k_{4}. Even at a first glance it should also be apparent that a 'weight' of 2/6 is given to k_{2} and k_{3} while a smaller weighting of 1/6 is attributed to k_{1} and k_{2}. What then do these k-value correspond to geometrically?

Look first at k_{1}. It is equal to the function f(x_{n},y_{n}) multiplied by the step-size h, which is just the Euler prediction for Δy. It is the vertical distance from the previous point to the next Euler-predicted point.

Then consider k_{2}. It should be noted that the x-value at which the function is being evaluated is halfway across the prediction interval and the y-value consists of the current y-value plus half of the Euler predicted Δy. So then the function is evaluated at a point lying halfway between the current point and the Euler-predicted next point. When we evaluate the function at this point what is produced is an estimate of the slope of the solution curve at this halfway point on the curve. Multiplying this result by h gives a prediction of the y-jump made by the solution across the entire interval. However, this prediction is made not on the slope of the solution at the left end of the interval but on the estimated slope halfway to the next Euler-predicted point.

A comparison can be made between k_{3} and k_{2}, with the only difference in their formulation being the replacement of k_{1} by k_{2}. Here the function evaluated at this point gives an estimate of the solution slope at the midpoint of the prediction interval but one which is based in the y-jump predicted by k_{2} rather than the Euler-predicted one. When multiplied by h we get a further estimate of the y-jump made by the solution across the whole interval.

Finally, k_{4} evaluates the function at the right-hand side of the prediction interval. The y-value at which the function is evaluated, y_{n}+k_{3} is an estimate of the y-value at the right-hand side based on the estimate of the y-jump made by k_{3}. In its entirety, k_{4} gives a final estimate of the y-jump made by the solution across the entire width of the prediction interval.

So to provide a summary: each k_{i} yields an estimate of the y-jump made by the solution across the entire width of the prediction interval h, with each using the previous k_{i} to make its estimate. The Runge-Kutta formula can be viewed as the y-value of the current point plus a weighted average of four different predictions for the slope.

**Figure 2: Runge-Kutta technique**

# Implementation

The code which performs the operations in the Runge-Kutta algorithm is shown below.

The operation of the algorithm is thus; k_{1} is calculated from the value stored from the solved differential equation which is stored in the array "ode", multiplied by our step size h which can be chosen by the user. This process is looped round for each variable to produce an array with an element for variable in the system. Values for y_{2} are then calculated using the value for k_{1} and the y value from the previous iteration, which is initially zero. Again this process is looped round for each variable. Similar processes are followed for the other values, and finally the y value if found by averaging the calculated k-values. The Runge-Kutta function is called for every increment the model is run.

void RungeKutta(double y[], double dy[]){ double k1[var], k2[var], k3[var], k4[var], y2[var], y3[var], y4[var], *pode; double h = 0.025; pode = ode(y,dy); //Calculates k1 (for all variables) -> The slope at the start of the interval (h) for (int i = 0; i < var; ++i) { k1[i] = *(pode + i) * h; }

// Calculates k2 (for all variables) -> The slope at the midpoint of the interval (h), for (int i = 0; i < var; ++i) { y2[i] =y[i] + k1[i] * 0.5 ; } pode = ode(y2,dy); for (int i = 0; i < var; ++i) { k2[i] = *(pode + i) * h; }

// Calculates k3 (for all variables) -> The slope at the midpoint of... using the y value (y2) determined from k2. for (int i = 0; i < var; i++) { y3[i]=y[i] + k2[i] * 0.5; } pode = ode(y3,dy); for (int i = 0; i < var; i++) { k3[i] = *(pode + i) * h; }

// Calculates k4 (for all variables) -> The slope at the end of the interval (h). for (int i = 0; i < var; i++) { y4[i]= y[i] + k3[i]; } pode=ode(y4,dy); for (int i = 0; i < var; i++) { k4[i] = *(pode + i) * h; }

// Calculates the new y values (for all variables). for (int i = 0; i < var; i++){ y[i] +=((k1[i] + 2*k2[i] + 2*k3[i] + k4[i])/6); } }

# References

[1] Barker.C.A, "Numerical Methods for Solving Differential Equations,The Runge-Kutta Method, Theoretical Introduction", San Joaquin Delta College, 2009 http://calculuslab.deltacollege.edu/ODE/7-C-3/7-C-3-h.html, [Accessed 13 September 2010]

[2] "Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing", Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp 704-707