Team:SJTU-BioX-Shanghai/result

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Eukaryotic approach)
Line 6: Line 6:
==Demonstration==
==Demonstration==
===Eukaryotic approach===
===Eukaryotic approach===
-
#Demonstration of Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)
+
*Demonstration of Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)
-
##Expression
+
**Expression
We transfected ECHO cells with pcDNA containing the gene encoding ChR2 and YFP, and tested the expression of ChR2 by exposing the transfected cells to blue light. Cells were cultured in '''(blank)''', with foil wrapped around to avoid light. 24 hours after transfection, the cells were dyed with '''(blank)''', which means the nuclei would display the color of blue under microscope. With a confocal microscope, we found that blue points(i.e. cell nuclei) were surrounded by green areas, as shown below:
We transfected ECHO cells with pcDNA containing the gene encoding ChR2 and YFP, and tested the expression of ChR2 by exposing the transfected cells to blue light. Cells were cultured in '''(blank)''', with foil wrapped around to avoid light. 24 hours after transfection, the cells were dyed with '''(blank)''', which means the nuclei would display the color of blue under microscope. With a confocal microscope, we found that blue points(i.e. cell nuclei) were surrounded by green areas, as shown below:
Line 16: Line 16:
According to the two pictures above, we saw that ChR2 had been expressed in 293T cell, and even their position was on the cell membrane. This is an essential precondition for its functioning.
According to the two pictures above, we saw that ChR2 had been expressed in 293T cell, and even their position was on the cell membrane. This is an essential precondition for its functioning.
-
##Function
+
**Function
We then began to test whether this molecule could function well as in neurons. Similar to that in neurons, the expression level of two genes ARC and ZIF268, is the standard for evaluating functioning of ChR2. According to references, we found that intermittent light was better for ChR2 to function normally, whereas continuous light could inactive ChR2. The equipment for discontinuous blue light is like that:
We then began to test whether this molecule could function well as in neurons. Similar to that in neurons, the expression level of two genes ARC and ZIF268, is the standard for evaluating functioning of ChR2. According to references, we found that intermittent light was better for ChR2 to function normally, whereas continuous light could inactive ChR2. The equipment for discontinuous blue light is like that:
Line 31: Line 31:
From the PCR results we found that the expression of ARC had NO evident differences, while that of ZIF268 did. In Fig. 4, cells with blue light illumination has a higher expression level of ZIF268, which indicated the functioning of ChR2.
From the PCR results we found that the expression of ARC had NO evident differences, while that of ZIF268 did. In Fig. 4, cells with blue light illumination has a higher expression level of ZIF268, which indicated the functioning of ChR2.
-
##Real-time PCR
+
**Real-time PCR
In order to render the result more convincing, we also conducted Real-Time PCR for these two genes.
In order to render the result more convincing, we also conducted Real-Time PCR for these two genes.
Line 37: Line 37:
'''(blank)'''
'''(blank)'''
-
#Demonstration for MEF2-JeT promoter
+
*Demonstration for MEF2-JeT promoter
'''(blank)'''
'''(blank)'''
-
#Demonstration for ChR2-MEF2-JeT
+
*Demonstration for ChR2-MEF2-JeT
'''(blank)'''
'''(blank)'''
-
+
 
==Characterization==
==Characterization==
* '''details'''
* '''details'''
{{Template:SJTU10-footer}}
{{Template:SJTU10-footer}}

Revision as of 07:24, 25 October 2010

SJTU-BioX-Shanghai 2010

Contents

Result overview

  • details

Parts

Go to Partsregistry to see our submitted parts.

Demonstration

Eukaryotic approach

  • Demonstration of Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)
    • Expression

We transfected ECHO cells with pcDNA containing the gene encoding ChR2 and YFP, and tested the expression of ChR2 by exposing the transfected cells to blue light. Cells were cultured in (blank), with foil wrapped around to avoid light. 24 hours after transfection, the cells were dyed with (blank), which means the nuclei would display the color of blue under microscope. With a confocal microscope, we found that blue points(i.e. cell nuclei) were surrounded by green areas, as shown below:

ChR2 expression 1 ChR2 expression 2

According to the two pictures above, we saw that ChR2 had been expressed in 293T cell, and even their position was on the cell membrane. This is an essential precondition for its functioning.

    • Function

We then began to test whether this molecule could function well as in neurons. Similar to that in neurons, the expression level of two genes ARC and ZIF268, is the standard for evaluating functioning of ChR2. According to references, we found that intermittent light was better for ChR2 to function normally, whereas continuous light could inactive ChR2. The equipment for discontinuous blue light is like that:

(blank)

Once started, it illuminated the cell culture in a way similar to that below:

(blank)

After excitation, we extracted total RNA with a Promega Kit. Then we conducted RT-PCR for ARC and ZIF268 with GAPDH as the reference gene. Photos for the results:

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

From the PCR results we found that the expression of ARC had NO evident differences, while that of ZIF268 did. In Fig. 4, cells with blue light illumination has a higher expression level of ZIF268, which indicated the functioning of ChR2.

    • Real-time PCR

In order to render the result more convincing, we also conducted Real-Time PCR for these two genes.

(blank)

  • Demonstration for MEF2-JeT promoter

(blank)

  • Demonstration for ChR2-MEF2-JeT

(blank)

Characterization

  • details