Team:SDU-Denmark/project-r

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Results)
(Results)
Line 11: Line 11:
=== Photosensor ===
=== Photosensor ===
'''Motility assay:'''<br>  
'''Motility assay:'''<br>  
-
In this experiment we shone blue light on one half of the plate, while the other half was in the dark. We then placed one colony in each half and observed their motility pattern after 24 hours. We did this for three different strains of E.Coli - DH5alpha, Wildtype Mg1655 and Mg1655 containing a plasmid with our photosensor constitutively on. See the results for yourself:<br>
+
In this experiment we shone blue light on one half of the plate, while the other half was in the dark. We then placed one colony in each half and observed their motility pattern after 24 hours. We did this for three different strains of E.Coli - DH5alpha, Wildtype Mg1655 and Mg1655 containing a plasmid with our photosensor constitutively on. See the results for yourself: Light shone on the right half of the plates, the left half was in the dark.<br>
-
Light shone on the right half of the plates, the left half was in the dark.<br>
+
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-MG1655.JPG|250px|MG1655]]
-
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-MG1655.JPG|250px|thumb|right|MG1655]]
+
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-Photosensor.JPG|250px|Photosensor]]
-
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-Photosensor.JPG|250px|thumb|right|Photosensor]]
+
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-DH5alpha.JPG|250px|DH5alpha]]<br>
-
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-DH5alpha.JPG|250px|thumb|DH5alpha]]
+
Interpreting these results is not totally obvious since the effect of different motility patterns can be counter intuitive in semisolid agar. An explanation as to how different motility patterns show up on semisolid agar plates is explained by Englert et al. in the book "Microfluidic techniques for the analysis of bacterial chemotaxis":<br><br>
Interpreting these results is not totally obvious since the effect of different motility patterns can be counter intuitive in semisolid agar. An explanation as to how different motility patterns show up on semisolid agar plates is explained by Englert et al. in the book "Microfluidic techniques for the analysis of bacterial chemotaxis":<br><br>
Line 27: Line 26:
Bacteria containing the photosensor will exhibit a lowered tumbling rate when exposed to blue light (wavelengths around 350nm - 450nm). This was analysed with the help of video microscopy and the open source software [http://db.cse.ohio-state.edu/CellTrack/ "CellTrack"]. The individual cells trajectory was tracked and their speed measured. The tracking results are as follows:
Bacteria containing the photosensor will exhibit a lowered tumbling rate when exposed to blue light (wavelengths around 350nm - 450nm). This was analysed with the help of video microscopy and the open source software [http://db.cse.ohio-state.edu/CellTrack/ "CellTrack"]. The individual cells trajectory was tracked and their speed measured. The tracking results are as follows:
<br>
<br>
-
 
+
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-PSblue1.png |250px|Photosensor bacteria exposed to blue light]]
-
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-PSblue1.png |250px|thumb|Photosensor bacteria exposed to blue light]]
+
[[Image:PSred sample 1 trajectory - Cell 1.png |250px|Photosensor bacteria exposed to red light (~580nm wavelength)]]
-
[[Image:PSred sample 1 trajectory - Cell 1.png |250px|thumb|Photosensor bacteria exposed to red light (~580nm wavelength)]]
+
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-WTblue1.png |250px|Wildtype bacteria exposed to blue light]]<br>
-
[[Image:Team-SDU-Denmark-WTblue1.png |250px|thumb|Wildtype bacteria exposed to blue light]]
+
-
 
+
The phototaxic bacteria move more in a straight line when exposed to bluelight, as can be seen when comparing the trajectories of the thee bacteria given earlier. These were taken from a batch of 10 cells tracked per sample.
The phototaxic bacteria move more in a straight line when exposed to bluelight, as can be seen when comparing the trajectories of the thee bacteria given earlier. These were taken from a batch of 10 cells tracked per sample.
Line 38: Line 35:
'''UV-Vis spectrophotometer determination of beta-carotene production:'''<br>
'''UV-Vis spectrophotometer determination of beta-carotene production:'''<br>
In this experiment cells was prepare and harvested according to protocol [https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#EX1.1]. This experiment was preformed with four different strain of E. Coli – wildtype Top10, wildtype MG1655, Top10 containing PSB1A2 with K274210 constitutively active and MG1655 containing PSB1A2 with K274210 constitutively active. The measurements were preformed on cells both in the exponential and stationary phase. The resulting graphs is presented beneath the text<br>
In this experiment cells was prepare and harvested according to protocol [https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#EX1.1]. This experiment was preformed with four different strain of E. Coli – wildtype Top10, wildtype MG1655, Top10 containing PSB1A2 with K274210 constitutively active and MG1655 containing PSB1A2 with K274210 constitutively active. The measurements were preformed on cells both in the exponential and stationary phase. The resulting graphs is presented beneath the text<br>
-
[[Image:Team-SDU-denmarkBetacarotene samples with controles (exponential_phase).png |250px]]
+
[[Image:Team-SDU-denmarkBetacarotene samples with controles (exponential_phase).png |500px]]
[[Image:Team-SDU-denmarkBetacarotene samples with controles (stationary phase).png |250px]]
[[Image:Team-SDU-denmarkBetacarotene samples with controles (stationary phase).png |250px]]

Revision as of 11:52, 18 October 2010