Team:SDU-Denmark/Bielefeld

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {{:Team:SDU-Denmark/css2}} {{:Team:SDU-Denmark/navi2}} <div id="subnavi"> <div id="parts"> </div> </div>)
Line 3: Line 3:
<div id="subnavi">
<div id="subnavi">
<div id="parts">
<div id="parts">
 +
=Helping another iGEM Team with characterization=
 +
== 2010 [https://2010.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany Bielefeld] brick K389016 ==
 +
[[Image:Team SDU-Denmark Bielefeld Colony PCR-1.jpg |210px|thumb|Colony-PCR of K389016]]
 +
We helped the Bielefeld team characteriseing their brick K389016. It is a VirA/G receptor system with a mRFP reporter gene. Our task was to replicate their experiment which showed that acetosyringone induced the promoter and theirby increasing expression of mRFP. <br><br>
 +
We recieved a miniprep with [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K389016 K389016] in pSB1C3 together with a list of experiments and characterization assays the Bielefeld team would like us to carry out. <br>
 +
We transformed the plasmids into ''E. coli'' strain MG1655 and ran a colony-PCR of four different colonies the following day. Over night cultures of the colonies was made and used for fluorescence measurements. The picture shows that cells in all four colonies contained K389016 in pSB1C3.
 +
<br><br>
 +
=== Characterization ===
 +
[[Image:Team-SDU-Bielefeld.PNG|400px|thumb|OD550 nm of MG1655-pSB1C3-K389016]] The OD550 nm was measured every two hours for a 10 hour period. <br>
 +
The characterisation experiment were carried out according to protocol ([https://2010.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/protocols#Charactarization_of_K389016_.28VirA.2FG_reporter_device_mRFP.29 CK1.1]). The transformant were grown ON i LB-media and following day boosted and grown with different acetosyringone concentrations: 0uM, 100uM, 200uM and 400uM. The culture without acetosyringone was used as a control. The cultures were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius until the cells reached stationary phase. A growth assay was carried out with measurements taken at OD<sub>550</sub> every 2 hours for 10 hours. For further knowledge see [https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/d/da/Bielefeld_karakterisering_OD.zip raw data.] Parallel with the OD<sub>550</sub> measurements samples were taken and used for fluorescence measurements.<br><br>
 +
[[Image:Team SDU-Denmark Bielefeld Typhoon trio.JPG|210px|thumb|left|Typhoon trio fluorescence scanning of MG1655-pSB1C3-K389016 induced with 200 uM acetosyringone. Excitation: 633nm Emittance: 670nm. No RFP detection, any red seen in the picture is noice.]] <br>
 +
The fluorescence measurements was carried out on a Perkin Elmer LS55 fluorescence spectrometer and the data was analysis with FL win Lab program. We did single read with excitation on 584 nm and emission 607 nm. We tried using both different excitation and emission slit size and preformed the experiment twice but unfortunately we were unable to detect RFP in the cells. See the fluorescence [https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/1/10/Team-sdu-denmark-Fluorescence.zip raw data] here. <br><br>
 +
We furthermore tested the cells on a Typhoon Trio but once again we could not detect RFP. We were advised by the Bielefeld team to use excitation 584nm and emittance 607nm. This was done when using the Perkin Elmer LS55 fluorescence spectrometer, but the Typhoon trio has limited settings and according to the Typhoon trio manual RFP can be detected at excitation 633nm and emittance 670nm. <br>
 +
The picture above shows the fluorescence scanning preformed on the Bielefeld part induced with 200uM acetosyringone. We spinned an over night culture of MG1655-pSB1C3-K38901 down, removed the supernatant and resuspended the pellet i LB-media. The resupension was transfered to a glass slide and covered by a cover slide. No emittans is seen in the picture, any light seen on the picture is noice. <br><br>
 +
Non of us have any experiment working with fluorescence spectrometer or the part it self. Further more are our fluorescence spectrometer different than the one the Bielefeld team used, therefore the instrumental settings might be different than theirs. Because we only had two days to replicate the experiment, we did not have time to try different setting. Overall the insignificant data are probally due to our lack time, experiance with the brick and not the functionality of the biobrick, K389016.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 23:07, 27 October 2010