Team:METU Turkey/Results Discussion/Cell Sensor Experiments

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(20 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 310: Line 310:
             <span>
             <span>
                 <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Project">Description</a> |
                 <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Project">Description</a> |
-
                                 <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Planing">Planing</a> |
+
                                 <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Planning">Planning</a> |
                                  
                                  
-
                                 <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion">Results & Dicussion</a>  
+
                                 <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Results_Discussion">Results & Discussion</a>  
|
|
-
                       <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Conclusion">Conclusion</a> |
+
                       <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Conclusions">Conclusions</a> |
                       <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Future_Work">Future Work</a> |
                       <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:METU_Turkey/Future_Work">Future Work</a> |
Line 370: Line 370:
</td>
</td>
<td>
<td>
-
<p style="font-size:110%; color:#576f91; font-family:georgia,serif;"><br>Design and ordering of DNA parts
+
<p style="font-size:110%; color:#576f91; font-family:georgia,serif;"><br>  
-
<br>Fermentor studies
+
<br>
 +
<br><h2>Fermentor studies</h2>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>- <h3>Culturing:</h3> These studies showed that our E.coli BL21 DE3 strain grow well until absorbance at 600 nm reaches 2.2. However, because of high growing capacity of fermentor, sufficient time is not present for Carbon monoxide induction. Therefore, we changed fermentor to flask in order to have higher induction time period of carbon monoxide
 +
<br>- <h3>Viability:</h3> Cells having absorbance at 0.05 have reached the stationary phase in 3 hours and starting from 4th hour, our bacteria cultures started to die.
 +
<br>- <h3>Reproducibility:</h3> Our data acquired from fermentor studies are not reproducible because CO was induced to death cells.
-
<br>- Culturing: These studies showed that our E.coli BL21 DE3 strain grow well until absorbance at 600 nm reaches 2.2. However, because of high growing capacity of fermentor, sufficient time is not present for Carbon monoxide induction. Therefore, we changed fermentor to flask in order to have higher induction time period of carbon monoxide
+
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 572px; height: 350px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/3b/Growth_curve_alpha_1.JPG"></a></div>
-
<br>- Viability: Cells having absorbance at 0.05 have reached the stationary phase in 3 hours and starting from 4th hour, our bacteria cultures started to die.
+
-
<br>- Reproducibility: Our data acquired from fermentor studies are not reproducible because CO was induced to death cells.
+
-
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/3b/Growth_curve_alpha_1.JPG"></a></div>
+
<br>- <h3>Myoglobin Assay:</h3> Our data acquired from myoglobin assay is not clear because absorbance acquired from cell density have interefered with myoglogin assay data.
 +
<br>- <h3>CFU(Colony Forming Unit):</h3> We couldn’t observe growth of bacteria starting from 4th  hour of fermentation.
 +
<br>- <h3>Fluorescence measurements:</h3> Fluorescence was detected due to auto-fluorescence of CooA proteins. Since our bacteria cultures have expression vector, CooA is highly expressed which in turn causes fluorescence.</br>
-
<br>- Myoglobin Assay: Our data acquired from myoglobin assay is not clear because absorbance acquired from cell density have interefered with myoglogin assay data.
 
-
<br>- CFU(Colony Forming Unit): We couldn’t observe growth of bacteria starting from 4th  hour of fermentation.
 
-
<br>- Fluorescence measurements: Fluorescence was detected due to auto-fluorescence of CooA proteins. Since our bacteria cultures have expression vector, CooA is highly expressed which in turn causes fluorescence.
 
-
<br>Flask experiments
+
<br>
 +
<br><h2>Flask experiments</h2></br>
-
<br>- Culturing: We didn’t have enough time to test our final vector. Instead, we have used BBa_K352017 to test the RFP production. We have used 300 mL flasks with 80 mL LB culture. We have applied 80 Ml Carbon monoxide to some. The results were successful.  Cultures induced with carbon monoxide successfully expressed red fluorescent protein.
+
<br>
-
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/4/49/Culturing_alpha_1.JPG"></a></div>
+
<br>- <h3>Culturing:</h3> We didn’t have enough time to test our final vector. Instead, we have used BBa_K352017 to test the RFP production. We have used 300 mL flasks with 80 mL LB culture. We have applied 80 Ml Carbon monoxide to some. The results were successful.  Cultures induced with carbon monoxide successfully expressed red fluorescent protein.
 +
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 963px; height: 393px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/4/49/Culturing_alpha_1.JPG"></a></div>
 +
 +
 +
<br>
 +
<br><h2>Myoglobin assay optimization</h2></br>
 +
<br>
-
<br>Myoglobin assay optimization
 
<br>- We have planned to measure CO presence with myoglobin assay. We used myoglobin purchased from Sigma to detect levels of Carbon monoxide. In our experiments, we couldn’t measure exact CO in the environment owing to the fact that sensitivity level of the myoglobin bonded with CO was not sufficient to observe absorbance at 540 nm.
<br>- We have planned to measure CO presence with myoglobin assay. We used myoglobin purchased from Sigma to detect levels of Carbon monoxide. In our experiments, we couldn’t measure exact CO in the environment owing to the fact that sensitivity level of the myoglobin bonded with CO was not sufficient to observe absorbance at 540 nm.
Signal quantification with fluorescence spectroscopy  
Signal quantification with fluorescence spectroscopy  
-
<br>- Signal Quantification of pCooF-RBS-GFP-TT: For this experiment, the bacteria containing the vector having the construct and expression vector pTriEx is incubated in E.coli BL21 strain at different conditions. The results are as the following;
 
-
<td>
+
<br>
-
<p style="font-size:110%; color:#576f91; font-family:georgia,serif;">
+
<br><h3>Signal Quantification of pCooF-RBS-GFP-TT:</h3> </br>
-
'''Cloning'''
+
<br>
 +
 
 +
<br>For this experiment, the bacteria containing the vector having the construct and expression vector pTriEx is incubated in E.coli BL21 strain at different conditions. The results are as the following;
 +
<br>
 +
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 902px; height: 390px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/1/1b/PCooF_experiment_alpha_1_florasan_grafik.JPG"></a></div>
 +
 
 +
<br>- From the data acquired from spectrophotometer, we observed that neither CO presence nor the presence of pCooF-RBS-GFP-TT affected GFP intensity. We acknowledged that fluorescence increase in the intensity of 510 nm was result of fluorescent nature of CooA. It is suspected that the result is dependent on our strain, BL21, caused the unexpected results.   
<br>- From the data acquired from spectrophotometer, we observed that neither CO presence nor the presence of pCooF-RBS-GFP-TT affected GFP intensity. We acknowledged that fluorescence increase in the intensity of 510 nm was result of fluorescent nature of CooA. It is suspected that the result is dependent on our strain, BL21, caused the unexpected results.   
Signal Quantification of pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA: We have tried another construct pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA at TOP10 strain. The results were successful. We have put our construct in different environments (flasks with different conditions) and compared the RFP fluorescence.
Signal Quantification of pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA: We have tried another construct pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA at TOP10 strain. The results were successful. We have put our construct in different environments (flasks with different conditions) and compared the RFP fluorescence.
-
</br><br>
 
-
- Imaging with confocal laser scanning microscopy
 
-
- Signal Visualization of pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA:
 
-
</br>
 
-
<br>- Restriction Digestion: Two different enzyme types of Fermentas have been used for this purpose (Fast Digest-Conventional).Fast Digest enzymes have proven to be more useful because of time saving properties.</br>
 
-
<br>- Ligation: Ligation procedure was performed according to molar ratio of fragments. </br>
 
-
'''
 
-
Validation'''
 
-
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/ff/Agar_plate_sol.JPG"></a></div>
+
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 900px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/b/b6/BU_SEFER_TAMAM.JPG"></a></div>
-
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 300px; height: 300px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/67/Agar_Plate_sa%C4%9F.JPG"></a></div>
 
-
<br>- Sequencing: 5 of parts have been sequenced and 1 one the parts was completely wrong sequence. PcooM-RBS-RFP–TT part doesn’t have the right sequence. For this reason, we have cloned this part again and sent to IGEM headquarters. However, we didn’t have enough time for sequencing of other parts.</br>
 
-
<br>- Agarose gel Electrophoresis: We have observed exact bands on agarose gel for each part.</br>
 
-
<br>- Fluorescence Spectrophotometer and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy data: Experiments done with pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA showed that RFP fluorescence is very high with CO applied samples. Those results show that our newly cloned biobrick works successfully.</br>
 
-
<br>- Agar plates: Our Agar plates with pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA showed that because of low level of constitutive binding of CooA to pCooM promoter, we have observed low level of RFP fluorescence on agar plates.
 
</br>
</br>
 +
<div align="center"><br>
 +
Figure 3: Fluorescence spectra of RFP constructs and controls</br></div>
 +
<br>
<br>
-
'''
+
<br> <h3>Signal Visualization of pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA:</h3>
-
Assembly of final construct'''
+
<br>
-
- Construction: We have designed two different vectors, one containing pTriEx vector containing CooA and one containing our final construct. Our final construct shows to be ineffective when there is pTriEx expression vector. Owing to this, we have designed a new vector which has pLacI-RBS-CooA. However, we didn’t have enough time for complete construction of the final vector.</br>
+
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 422px; height: 413px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/2/26/Confocal_sa%C4%9F.JPG "></a></div>
 +
 
 +
<div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 433px; height: 432px;" alt="w7" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/ae/Confocal_sol.JPG "></a></div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</br>
 +
 
.</p>
.</p>

Latest revision as of 03:34, 28 October 2010

Home

 

2- Cell Sensor Experiments




Fermentor studies



-

Culturing:

These studies showed that our E.coli BL21 DE3 strain grow well until absorbance at 600 nm reaches 2.2. However, because of high growing capacity of fermentor, sufficient time is not present for Carbon monoxide induction. Therefore, we changed fermentor to flask in order to have higher induction time period of carbon monoxide
-

Viability:

Cells having absorbance at 0.05 have reached the stationary phase in 3 hours and starting from 4th hour, our bacteria cultures started to die.
-

Reproducibility:

Our data acquired from fermentor studies are not reproducible because CO was induced to death cells.
w7

-

Myoglobin Assay:

Our data acquired from myoglobin assay is not clear because absorbance acquired from cell density have interefered with myoglogin assay data.
-

CFU(Colony Forming Unit):

We couldn’t observe growth of bacteria starting from 4th hour of fermentation.
-

Fluorescence measurements:

Fluorescence was detected due to auto-fluorescence of CooA proteins. Since our bacteria cultures have expression vector, CooA is highly expressed which in turn causes fluorescence.


Flask experiments




-

Culturing:

We didn’t have enough time to test our final vector. Instead, we have used BBa_K352017 to test the RFP production. We have used 300 mL flasks with 80 mL LB culture. We have applied 80 Ml Carbon monoxide to some. The results were successful. Cultures induced with carbon monoxide successfully expressed red fluorescent protein.
w7


Myoglobin assay optimization




- We have planned to measure CO presence with myoglobin assay. We used myoglobin purchased from Sigma to detect levels of Carbon monoxide. In our experiments, we couldn’t measure exact CO in the environment owing to the fact that sensitivity level of the myoglobin bonded with CO was not sufficient to observe absorbance at 540 nm. Signal quantification with fluorescence spectroscopy

Signal Quantification of pCooF-RBS-GFP-TT:




For this experiment, the bacteria containing the vector having the construct and expression vector pTriEx is incubated in E.coli BL21 strain at different conditions. The results are as the following;
w7

- From the data acquired from spectrophotometer, we observed that neither CO presence nor the presence of pCooF-RBS-GFP-TT affected GFP intensity. We acknowledged that fluorescence increase in the intensity of 510 nm was result of fluorescent nature of CooA. It is suspected that the result is dependent on our strain, BL21, caused the unexpected results. Signal Quantification of pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA: We have tried another construct pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA at TOP10 strain. The results were successful. We have put our construct in different environments (flasks with different conditions) and compared the RFP fluorescence.
w7


Figure 3: Fluorescence spectra of RFP constructs and controls


Signal Visualization of pCooM-RBS-RFP-TT-pLac-RBS-CooA:


w7
w7

.