"
Team:Groningen/Judging
From 2010.igem.org
(New page: '''Judging information''' We submitted the following most important BioBricks. Information about that BioBricks can be found on the following page:) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We submitted the following most important BioBricks. Information about that BioBricks can be found on the following page: | We submitted the following most important BioBricks. Information about that BioBricks can be found on the following page: | ||
| + | |||
| + | iGEM Medals | ||
| + | We believe our team deserves the following medal:BronzeSilverGold | ||
| + | Because we met the following criteria (check all that apply and provide details where needed) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Requirements for a Bronze Medal: | ||
| + | Register the team, have a great summer, and plan to have fun at the Jamboree. | ||
| + | Successfully complete and submit this iGEM 2009 Judging form. | ||
| + | Create and share a Description of the team's project using the iGEM wiki and the team's parts using the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. | ||
| + | Plan to present a Poster and Talk at the iGEM Jamboree. | ||
| + | Enter information detailing at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device in the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. Including: | ||
| + | Primary nucleaic acid sequence | ||
| + | Description of function | ||
| + | Authorship | ||
| + | Safety notes, if relevant. | ||
| + | Acknowedgment of sources and references | ||
| + | Submit DNA for at least one new BioBrick Part or Device to the Registry. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Additional Requirements for a Silver Medal: | ||
| + | Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected; characterize the operation of your new part/device. | ||
| + | Enter this information and other documentation on both the iGEM 2009 wiki and the Registry. | ||
| + | Part Number(s): BBa_K190015, BBa_K190017, BBa_K190028 | ||
| + | iGEM Wiki Page Name: Team:Groningen/Parts/Submitted_Parts, Team:Groningen/Project/Promoters, Team:Groningen/Project/Transport | ||
| + | |||
| + | Additional Requirements for a Gold Medal: (one OR more) | ||
| + | Characterize or improve an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information back on the Registry. | ||
| + | Part Number(s): BBa_I750016, BBa_J23100, BBa_J23106, BBa_J23109 | ||
| + | Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. | ||
| + | Link to this information on your wiki. Page name: Groningen_(and_Amsterdam)_visiting_Delft | ||
| + | Develop and document a new technical standard that supports the: (check all that apply) | ||
| + | design of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or | ||
| + | construction of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or | ||
| + | characterization of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or | ||
| + | analysis, modeling, and simulation of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or | ||
| + | sharing BioBrick Parts or Devices, either via physical DNA, or via the Internet | ||
| + | Please provide the BBF RFC number for your standard: | ||
| + | Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation. | ||
| + | Link to this information on your wiki. | ||
| + | Page name: Team:Groningen/HumanPractice | ||
| + | iGEM Prizes | ||
| + | All teams are eligible for prizes in their track, the grand prize, and for special prizes. The special prizes include Best Wiki, Best Poster, Best Presentation, Best New BioBrick Part (Natural or Engineered). To help the judges, please indicate if you feel you should be evaluated for any of the following special prizes: | ||
| + | Best Human Practice Advance | ||
| + | Best Experimental Measurement | ||
| + | Best Model | ||
| + | Please explain briefly why you should receive any of these three special prizes: | ||
| + | In the area of Human Practice we tried to create awareness on the subject of synthetic biology in general and our project in particular. This we did by means of a survey that we handed out to both specialist and non-specialists, we tried to approach the Delphi method for brainstorming. After extensive statistical tests were done an indication of the Dutch public opinion was created. As best experimental measurement, we have shown the presence of gas vesicles in our bacteria using Transmission Electron Microscopy. Furthermore we characterized the relative promotor strength of our arsenic-sensitive promoter using our own, robust, method. In terms of modelling, we have created an interactive model, which can be used and adapted on our wiki. This model makes use of a new way to deal with the quasi steady-state assumption, by explicitly stating the relative abundances of bound and unbound forms of substances. | ||
| + | Team_Parts | ||
| + | To help the judges evaluate your parts, please identify 3 of your parts that you feel are best documented and are of the highest quality. | ||
| + | Part Number(s): BBa_K190015, BBa_K190019, BBa_K190028 | ||
| + | Your team has listed these parts as your team favorites: | ||
| + | iGEM Safety | ||
| + | For iGEM 2009 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. | ||
| + | The iGEM judges expect that you have answered the four safety questions (Safety page) on your iGEM 2009 wiki. | ||
| + | Please provide the link to that page: | ||
| + | Page name: Team:Groningen/Safety | ||
| + | Attribution and Contributions | ||
| + | For iGEM 2009 the description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the team and distinguish it from work done by others, including the host labs, advisors, and instructors. | ||
| + | Please provide the link to that page: | ||
| + | Page name: None | ||
| + | Comments | ||
| + | If there is any other information about your project you would like to highlight for the judges, | ||
| + | please provide a link to your wiki page here: Team:Groningen/Project_Plan | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 24 October 2010
Judging information
We submitted the following most important BioBricks. Information about that BioBricks can be found on the following page:
iGEM Medals We believe our team deserves the following medal:BronzeSilverGold Because we met the following criteria (check all that apply and provide details where needed)
Requirements for a Bronze Medal: Register the team, have a great summer, and plan to have fun at the Jamboree. Successfully complete and submit this iGEM 2009 Judging form. Create and share a Description of the team's project using the iGEM wiki and the team's parts using the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. Plan to present a Poster and Talk at the iGEM Jamboree. Enter information detailing at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device in the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. Including: Primary nucleaic acid sequence Description of function Authorship Safety notes, if relevant. Acknowedgment of sources and references Submit DNA for at least one new BioBrick Part or Device to the Registry.
Additional Requirements for a Silver Medal: Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected; characterize the operation of your new part/device. Enter this information and other documentation on both the iGEM 2009 wiki and the Registry. Part Number(s): BBa_K190015, BBa_K190017, BBa_K190028 iGEM Wiki Page Name: Team:Groningen/Parts/Submitted_Parts, Team:Groningen/Project/Promoters, Team:Groningen/Project/Transport
Additional Requirements for a Gold Medal: (one OR more) Characterize or improve an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information back on the Registry. Part Number(s): BBa_I750016, BBa_J23100, BBa_J23106, BBa_J23109 Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. Link to this information on your wiki. Page name: Groningen_(and_Amsterdam)_visiting_Delft Develop and document a new technical standard that supports the: (check all that apply) design of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or construction of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or characterization of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or analysis, modeling, and simulation of BioBrick Parts or Devices, or sharing BioBrick Parts or Devices, either via physical DNA, or via the Internet Please provide the BBF RFC number for your standard: Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation. Link to this information on your wiki. Page name: Team:Groningen/HumanPractice iGEM Prizes All teams are eligible for prizes in their track, the grand prize, and for special prizes. The special prizes include Best Wiki, Best Poster, Best Presentation, Best New BioBrick Part (Natural or Engineered). To help the judges, please indicate if you feel you should be evaluated for any of the following special prizes: Best Human Practice Advance Best Experimental Measurement Best Model Please explain briefly why you should receive any of these three special prizes: In the area of Human Practice we tried to create awareness on the subject of synthetic biology in general and our project in particular. This we did by means of a survey that we handed out to both specialist and non-specialists, we tried to approach the Delphi method for brainstorming. After extensive statistical tests were done an indication of the Dutch public opinion was created. As best experimental measurement, we have shown the presence of gas vesicles in our bacteria using Transmission Electron Microscopy. Furthermore we characterized the relative promotor strength of our arsenic-sensitive promoter using our own, robust, method. In terms of modelling, we have created an interactive model, which can be used and adapted on our wiki. This model makes use of a new way to deal with the quasi steady-state assumption, by explicitly stating the relative abundances of bound and unbound forms of substances. Team_Parts To help the judges evaluate your parts, please identify 3 of your parts that you feel are best documented and are of the highest quality. Part Number(s): BBa_K190015, BBa_K190019, BBa_K190028 Your team has listed these parts as your team favorites: iGEM Safety For iGEM 2009 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. The iGEM judges expect that you have answered the four safety questions (Safety page) on your iGEM 2009 wiki. Please provide the link to that page: Page name: Team:Groningen/Safety Attribution and Contributions For iGEM 2009 the description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the team and distinguish it from work done by others, including the host labs, advisors, and instructors. Please provide the link to that page: Page name: None Comments If there is any other information about your project you would like to highlight for the judges, please provide a link to your wiki page here: Team:Groningen/Project_Plan
