Team:Groningen/2 August 2010

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 40: Line 40:
-
'''Jorrit''' goning on vacation to Copenhagen and Stockholm
+
'''Jorrit'''  
 +
 
 +
Going on vacation to Copenhagen and Stockholm
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Arend Jan'''
 +
 
 +
One week holliday
 +
 
 +
 
{{Team:Groningen/Footer}}
{{Team:Groningen/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 17:37, 27 October 2010

iGEM Groningen 2010

Hydrophobofilm
pushing coatings into a greener future


Week 31



Induction of chaplins on agar plates

Constructs with chaplin E and H where present in Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus subtilis ΔTasA. 100uL of subtilin solution 0%, 0.1%, 1%, 10% and 100% where plated on LB agar plates and let dry for 10min. Each strain was spread out with an inoculation loop on each concentration. As a control Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus subtilis ΔTasA without chaplins were spread out on all concentrations as well. The next morning the plates where visually analyzed. No difference between different subtilin concentrations were visible, furthermore, there were no differences between the strains with chaplins and the ones without. Adding a drop of water on the colonies did not show any difference in repellence between any of the samples. The only recognizable difference was the colonies morphologies between strains with or without TasA. The ΔTasA colonies where smaller and shinier since TasA is involved in biofilm formation.


Colonie Bacillus with TasA.jpgTasA-containing strains


Colonie Bacillus without TasA.jpgΔTasA-strains

Geeske

Continued with the samples Jorrit took after induction. He stored the supernatant and pellet separately at -20ºC. I proceded with TCA (supernatant) and TFA (of supernatant after TCA and of lysed and speedvac’ed pellet samples) treatments and made samples to analyse with SDS-PAGE. Gels showed inconclusive results.

Groningen 20100805 gel1.jpgall samples are the supernatant samples Groningen 20100805 gel2.jpgall samples are the supernatant samples Groningen 20100805 gel3.jpg

gel did not work as planned. samples leaked under other wells. all samples are the supernatant samples

Groningen 20100805 gel4.jpgall samples are the supernatant samples


We need better controls like empty pNZ8901 and a GFP-control because it seems like the inducing-system is leaky. When chaplins assemble they stay in the stacking gel during SDS-PAGE (Data from pellet-samples not shown).


Modellers

Trying to understand the 3D biofilm model of the van Loosdrecht group and search for more information Joël, Laura, Djoke


Jorrit

Going on vacation to Copenhagen and Stockholm


Arend Jan

One week holliday


Search

 

iGEM 2010 main page
iGEM HQ
iGEM Groningen Team page

University of Groningen
Where on earth are we?
Share |