Team:ETHZ Basel/Modeling/Movement

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Modeling of the bacterial movement)
Line 4: Line 4:
= Modeling of the bacterial movement =
= Modeling of the bacterial movement =
-
For simulating the movement of E.coli, we implemented a probabilistic model, meant to reproduce the main statistical features of the existing empirical data. At every time point of the simulation, CheYp concentration is received as an input from the molecular model of the Chemotaxis pathway. From the already - known CheYp - CCW movement dependence (or bias), the probability of CCW movement (running) for the given CheYp concentration and for the given time - point is obtained. The cell then probabilistically chooses whether to run or to tumble. The choice of the running state is equivalent to a change in spatial coordinates, but not in the movement angle, while the choice of the tumbling state corresponds to new movement angle and unchanged spatial coordinates. During tumbling, the change in angle is sampled from a Gaussian distribution, with mean and variance documented from the literature.
+
For simulating the movement of E.coli, we implemented a probabilistic model, meant to reproduce the main statistical features of the existing empirical data. At every time point of the simulation, CheYp concentration is received as an input from the molecular model of the Chemotaxis pathway. From the already - known CheYp - CCW movement dependence (or bias), the probability of CCW movement (running) for the given CheYp concentration and for the given time - point is obtained. The cell then probabilistically chooses whether to run or to tumble. The choice of the running state is equivalent to a change in spatial coordinates, together with a slight change in direction (movement angle), while the choice of the tumbling state corresponds to new movement angle and unchanged spatial coordinates.  
The dependence CheYp - running probability was obtained from the literature:
The dependence CheYp - running probability was obtained from the literature:
 +
[write bias]
 +
The biggest challenge regarding the movement model was obtaining a time - step - invariant behavior of the cell, whose reliability of statistical estimates should be the same, regardless of how often the cell had to choose its future state.
 +
In order to achieve this, we opted for a two - state model, in which the probability of running was controlled separately depending on whether the cell was running or tumbling.
-
    
+
One of the main assumptions in our model was that the mean tumbling length is constant. This assumption was made in accordance with existent published empirical data analyzing the chemotaxis movement. [citation]    
 +
 
 +
!PENDING!

Revision as of 02:06, 11 October 2010

Modeling of the bacterial movement

For simulating the movement of E.coli, we implemented a probabilistic model, meant to reproduce the main statistical features of the existing empirical data. At every time point of the simulation, CheYp concentration is received as an input from the molecular model of the Chemotaxis pathway. From the already - known CheYp - CCW movement dependence (or bias), the probability of CCW movement (running) for the given CheYp concentration and for the given time - point is obtained. The cell then probabilistically chooses whether to run or to tumble. The choice of the running state is equivalent to a change in spatial coordinates, together with a slight change in direction (movement angle), while the choice of the tumbling state corresponds to new movement angle and unchanged spatial coordinates.

The dependence CheYp - running probability was obtained from the literature:

[write bias]

The biggest challenge regarding the movement model was obtaining a time - step - invariant behavior of the cell, whose reliability of statistical estimates should be the same, regardless of how often the cell had to choose its future state. In order to achieve this, we opted for a two - state model, in which the probability of running was controlled separately depending on whether the cell was running or tumbling.

One of the main assumptions in our model was that the mean tumbling length is constant. This assumption was made in accordance with existent published empirical data analyzing the chemotaxis movement. [citation]


!PENDING!


Schematical overview of the relation between chemotaxis and the movement model.
1000$
BACTERIAL ARTWORK FOR SALE
Sketch for a possible implementation of the controller.

Analogous to the highly complex signal transduction in chemotaxis, there is an equally extensive system on side of the flagella, which is even less understood.
Brief descriptions about the statistics of E. coli movement can be found in the literature section and therefore the model will be a stochastical one.

A first implementation was performed by linking the CheYp concentration to the probability of being in the run or tumbling state. These two states either describe the movement and the reorientation as difference equations that can be evaluated at discrete time points. Based on literature statistics about the distribution of change in angle due to tumbling a weibull distribution was selected:

Chosen weibull distribution.

To represent the probability density function it is transformed into a vector that has a frequency of elements that corresponds to the relation of probabilities of the function.

Frequency of elements in the vector.

The reorientation happens by selecting a random element of the vector giving the new change in angle. The walks for a thousand steps at different constant CheYp concentrations are shown below:
At a CheYp concentration of 0 the probability for running is about 98%.

A random walk at CheYp = 0 [nM].

At CheYp = 12.5 [nM] both states are equally probable.

A random walk at CheYp = 12.5 [nM].

At CheYp = 25 [nM] tumbling is dominant.

A random walk at CheYp = 25 [nM].

Here is the check of change of angele at 25 [nM] for 1e5 steps:

Check of angle distribution.