Team:EPF Lausanne/Project immuno

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Proteins)
(Proteins)
Line 21: Line 21:
=Proteins=
=Proteins=
[[Image:P25_and_p28.png‎|right|150px|caption]]
[[Image:P25_and_p28.png‎|right|150px|caption]]
-
We have chosen two different ways to target the parasite <i>P.falciparum</i> and prevent the malaria transmission through mosquitos. Our engineered bacteria could express either an immunotoxin, or two p-proteins, or even both for maximum efficiency. We tried to express all of these proteins using the C3 plasmid incorporating the [[https://2010.igem.org/Team:EPF_Lausanne/Project_parts#Promoter_characterization| strong promoter]], a constitutive sequence for greater level of expression.  
+
We have chosen two different ways to target the parasite <i>P.falciparum</i> and prevent the malaria transmission through mosquitos. Our engineered bacteria could express either an immunotoxin, or two p-proteins, or even both for maximum efficiency. We tried to express all of these proteins using the C3 plasmid incorporating the [["https://2010.igem.org/Team:EPF_Lausanne/Project_parts#Promoter characterization" | strong promoter]], a constitutive sequence for greater level of expression.  
[[Image:Immuno.png‎|left|150px|caption]]
[[Image:Immuno.png‎|left|150px|caption]]
The [https://2010.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:EPF_Lausanne/Project/Background Immunotoxin] is one of our tools to block transmission of malaria parasite in mosquitos. It is composed of two main parts : The first one is a single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) directed to Pbs2l, which is a surface membrane protein of <i>Plasmodium berghei </i>. The second part is a lytic peptide, Shiva-1, which acts by forming “pores” on the parasite’s membrane. The immunotoxin is supposed to specifically target and lyse the parasite.
The [https://2010.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:EPF_Lausanne/Project/Background Immunotoxin] is one of our tools to block transmission of malaria parasite in mosquitos. It is composed of two main parts : The first one is a single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) directed to Pbs2l, which is a surface membrane protein of <i>Plasmodium berghei </i>. The second part is a lytic peptide, Shiva-1, which acts by forming “pores” on the parasite’s membrane. The immunotoxin is supposed to specifically target and lyse the parasite.

Revision as of 21:26, 26 October 2010



Contents

Proteins

caption

We have chosen two different ways to target the parasite P.falciparum and prevent the malaria transmission through mosquitos. Our engineered bacteria could express either an immunotoxin, or two p-proteins, or even both for maximum efficiency. We tried to express all of these proteins using the C3 plasmid incorporating the strong promoter, a constitutive sequence for greater level of expression.

caption

The Immunotoxin is one of our tools to block transmission of malaria parasite in mosquitos. It is composed of two main parts : The first one is a single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) directed to Pbs2l, which is a surface membrane protein of Plasmodium berghei . The second part is a lytic peptide, Shiva-1, which acts by forming “pores” on the parasite’s membrane. The immunotoxin is supposed to specifically target and lyse the parasite.

The different domaines of the immunotoxin. For more details and the sequence see the background section.

P25 and P28 are a class of important proteins expressed on the membrane of different type of Plasmodium; we call this ensemble of evolutionary conserved proteins the P-proteins. They are mainly expressed on the mosquito-stage parasite (ookinete). The ookinete has been intensively studied by scientists, looking for an ideal transmission-blocking vaccine target.

Results

A: The Immunotoxin is expressed and appears in the supernatant

Asaia growth curve: In blue, we can see the growth curve of E.coli containing the empty C3 plasmid. In red, we can see the growth of E.coli transformed with the C3 plasmid containing the Immunotoxin sequence. We could conclude that the expression of the Immunotoxin in high concetrations may prevent E.coli from growing. The spikes could indicate the clumping of cells due to Immunotoxin's action.

We tested expression of the immunotoxin in E.Coli (see Materials and Methods for details). In a western blot analysis of whole cell lysates we could see bands corresponding to full length immunotoxin and possibly degraded fragments of the protein (see figure). The immunotoxin contains a PelB sequence that targets it for secretion into the periplasm. We concentrated the supernatant of both the immunotoxin and a control culture by running it through a filtering device with a 5 kDa cut-off. Running a western blot with these samples (see figure) we verified that the immunotoxin was found in the supernatant as expected.

Gel1 (Lysates): We can see distinctive molecular fragments in the immunotoxin lane: The upper fragments (marked with red and purple arrows) match the molecular size of the immunotoxin of about 39 kDa. For the shorter of the two fragments the export tag pelB may have been cut off. The smaller sized fragment (green arrow) of about 20 kDa is most probably part of the degraded immunotoxin. Gel2 (Supernatants): A fragment of the correct size is detected in the supernatant. The smaller fragments (green and yellow arrows) probably correspond to smaller parts of the degraded immunotoxin.

B: The P-proteins are not expressed

The same experiments were conducted for the proteins p25 and p28. No bands were detected on the western blots (see figure) which leads us to the conclusion that these proteins were only very weakly expressed or not at all. This might be explained by the fact that we took the native sequence from Plasmodium falciparum . The genome of Plasmodium falciparum is very A-T-rich (UCSC Malaria Genome Browser). We think that expression of p25 and p28 may be improved by codon optimizing it for expression in bacteria like E.Coli and Asaia like we did for the immunotoxin. Additional to the Western Blots, to rule out the possibility that concentration was too low, we did a protein purification (following the Knight protocol) from a large culture volume (see figure) using Ni-NTA columns.


Gel1 (Western Blot): There are no fragments detected neither for p25 nor for p28. The fragment detected for the positive control around the weight expected verifies the success of the analysis Gel2 (Slver Stain): We tried to purify the proteins in order to exclude the possibility that the proteins were not detected due to low concentration. Protein purification was followed by silver stain analysis. Again, no bands were detected on the SDS page gel



wrap bottom