Team:EPF Lausanne/Humanpractices Movie

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Results of the survey)
(Results of the survey)
Line 79: Line 79:
-
[[Image:Pos_attititude.png|left|322px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 3''' Positive attitude]]
+
[[Image:Pos_attititude.png|left|322px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 3''' Positive attitude. ]]
[[Image:Neg_attititude.png|322px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 4''' Negative attitude]]  
[[Image:Neg_attititude.png|322px|thumb|bottom|'''Figure 4''' Negative attitude]]  

Revision as of 15:35, 27 October 2010


Contents

The Movie

caption

Our Human Practices project is an animated movie. The goal of this project is to promote a better understanding of Synthetic Biology. Simplification and playfulness are intended to reach a wide audience. Take a look...



Results of the survey

caption


To measure the impact of our movie, we created a survey with the help of a social psychologist (Vincent Pillaud, UNIL). We set up two different situations, one in which we have presented our film and one with a neutral film. We assessed the attitude of people and their knowledge (subjective and objective) before and after watching the film, as well as their emotions (order counterbalanced) and their judgement of the movies. 190 students participated voluntarily in this study (M age = 21.6 years).




  • Our movie increases the objective knowledge

We took into account two kinds of knowledge: the subjective knowledge and the objective knowledge. The subjective knowledge refers to a self-evaluation of knowledge whereas the objective knowledge refers to specific knowledge. The subjective knowledge was assessed through a scale ranging from 0 (no knowledge) to 100 (excellent knowledge). The objective knowledge is based on 12 questions about synthetic biology, 8 about general knowledge (for example “in Synthetic Biology, you insert genes to cells”) and 4 about knowledge in link with the film (for example “We can find populations of bacteria in the gut of mosquitoes”). In order to test the effect of our film of those two variables, we asked the same questions before and after the movie. A good answer counted for 1 point, an error for 0 point. The total was scaled to 100 (Figure 1). The results indicate a significant increase for the participants who saw our film whereas this wasn’t observed for the participants who saw the neutral film. Such a result indicates that our participants understood our movie and learned from it. Moreover we obtain the same effect when we analyse the questions related general knowledge and with the questions in link with our film separately. The subjective knowledge also increased after watching our movie but we observe this as well with the neutral movie (Figure 2).


Figure 1 Objective knowledge. Measured with questions about Synthetic Biology.
Figure 2 Subjective knowledge. Self-evaluation of participants.












  • Our movie leads to a negative attitude change toward synthetic biology.

We assessed both their positive and negative attitudes about Synthetic Biology separately according to the method of Kaplan, 1972. This allowed us to evaluate the different aspects in the attitude of the subject one could consider: they can evaluate synthetic biology as promising as well as potentially dangerous or having harmful effects at the same time. The results indicate that the positive attitude tends to decrease after watching the movie (Figure 3). We observe a similar effect with a neutral film. However, our iGEM movie has no effect on the negative attitude (Figure 4).


Figure 3 Positive attitude.
Figure 4 Negative attitude












in order to see


  • Emotions tend to become slightly more negative

We were also interested in emotions that could be triggered by the movie. We asked the participants to indicate the extent to which they feel scared, nervous, afraid (negative emotions), interested, alert and enthusiastic (positive emotions) toward Synthetic Biology. These 6 items were taken from the Watson & Tellegen, PANAS, 1988. We observe a similar decrease in the positive emotion for both movies (Figure 5). We observed anyway a small but significant increase in negative emotions triggered by our movie (Figure 6).


Figure 5 Positive emotions
Figure 6 Negative emotions











  • Discussion of the results

Theses results are quiet expected if we look at other studies in the literature about genetic manipulations, like cloning or genetically modified organisms. It confirms that even when people understand the subject, this is not necessarily accompanied by an increase in positive attitude regarding these subjects. Rather, more knowledge can make people more cautious and nervous, even if the population tends to support some very promising and needed applications of bioengineering.

Movie: The Story Board

caption
caption
caption
caption

That's how everything started.


Movie: The Making of

caption

The "sounds" evening movie...


And also some pictures....

Movie1.JPG Movie2.JPG

Movie3.JPG Movie5.JPG

Movie4.JPG Movie6.JPG

Movie7.JPG P1040242.jpg



wrap bottom