Team:DTU-Denmark/Project

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Designing the switch ==)
 
(81 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
-
[[image:wiki banner_967px.png]]
 
-
 
<html>
<html>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/6/6b/Wiki_banner_967px.png"  align="center"> </img>
<head>
<head>
<title>Welcome to the DTU iGEM wiki!</title>
<title>Welcome to the DTU iGEM wiki!</title>
Line 43: Line 42:
.links tr {
.links tr {
-
  background-color:#660066;
+
  background-color:#990000;
  height:30px;
  height:30px;
}
}
Line 67: Line 66:
.links a:hover {
.links a:hover {
-
background-color: #660066;
+
background-color: #999999;
}
}
Line 73: Line 72:
#header {
#header {
-
  width: 100%;
+
font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; color: #000080; text-decoration: none; cursor: none; width: 100%;
-
  text-align: left;
+
  text-align: left;}
 +
.header:hover {font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; color: #FF2200; text-decoration: none; cursor: hand }
 +
.subheader {font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; color: #000080; text-decoration: none; cursor: none }
 +
.subheader:hover {font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; color: #FF2200; text-decoration: none; cursor: hand }
 +
.popup { border-right: #ff6633 1px solid; border-top: #ff6633 1px solid; background: #ffffcc;
 +
border-left: #ff6633 1px solid; border-bottom: #ff6633 1px solid; font-style: normal; font-size: 8pt
}
}
Line 126: Line 130:
  background-color: #DDDDDD;
  background-color: #DDDDDD;
}
}
-
 
+
caption {font-size:85%}
</style>
</style>
<! -- END of style sheet -->
<! -- END of style sheet -->
Line 132: Line 136:
</head>
</head>
<body>
<body>
-
 
<!-- Table displaying top row of links -->
<!-- Table displaying top row of links -->
<table class="links" >
<table class="links" >
   <tr>
   <tr>
-
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark" >Home</a></font> </td>
+
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark" >Home</a></font></td>
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Team" >The Team</a> </font></td>
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Team" >The Team</a> </font></td>
-
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Project" >The Project</a> </font></td>
+
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Project" >The Project</a>  
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Parts" >Parts submitted</a> </font></td>
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Parts" >Parts submitted</a> </font></td>
-
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Modelling">Modelling</a></font> </td>
+
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Results">Results</a></font> </td>
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Notebook" title="Day to day lab activity">Notebook</a>  
     <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Notebook" title="Day to day lab activity">Notebook</a>  
 +
  <td align="center" ><font face="arial" size="3"><a class="mainLinks" href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Blog">Blog</a></font> </td>
</font></td>
</font></td>
   </tr>
   </tr>
</table>
</table>
 +
<table cellpadding=10px>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td width="163px" height="100%" valign="top">
 +
  <font color="#990000" face="arial" size="3">
 +
<ul type="circle">
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Background">Synthetic Biology</a></li><br>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Regulatory_sytems">Regulatory Systems</a></li>
 +
<ul><font size="2">
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Regulatory_sytems#lambda">Lambda Phage</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Regulatory_sytems#gifsy">Gifsy Phages</a></li>
 +
</font></ul>
 +
<br>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch">The Switch</a></li>
 +
<ul><font size="2">
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch#Biological_Switch">Biological Switches</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch#Bistable_Switches">Bistable Switches</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch#Design">Design of our Bi[o]stable Switch</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch#Engineering">Step-wise Engineering of the Switch</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch#Applications">Applications</a></li>
 +
</font></ul>
 +
<br><li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL">Synthetic Promoter Library</a>
 +
<ul><font size="2">
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL#standard">The DTU SPL Standard</a>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL#strategy">Strategy</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL#design">Primer Design</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL#protocol">Protocol</a></li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL#advantages">Advantages</a></li>
 +
</ul></font>
 +
</li><br>
 +
<li ><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Modelling">Modeling</a>
 +
<ul><font size="2">
 +
<li><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Modelling#Approach">Modeling Approach</a></li>
 +
</ul></font>
 +
</li><br>
 +
</ul>
 +
</td>
 +
  <td width="556px" height="100%" valign="top">
 +
  <font color="#990000" face="arial" size="5">
 +
<br> 
 +
<b>Project Concept</b><br><br>
 +
  </font>
 +
<p align="justify">As previously stated, the main goal of our project is to design a bistable switch. We want to enable bacteria to transition between two stable states. In our system, switching between states will be induced by two different inputs and each of the states will have a specific output associated with it.</p>
 +
 +
<p align="justify">Our original project concept evolved around building a switch that we could turn on and off continuously. Not only did we want the switch to be able to switch states, but we also wanted it to be able to stay in a certain state without having to induce it constantly. Several designs were discussed, for example using light at different wavelengths to induce the system.</p>
-
<!-- Main content area -->
+
<p align="justify">During the last couple of years several attempts have been made to construct bistable switches. One switch design is a one input, two outputs stable switch. It has a stable output but it looses the switching ability and 90% of the individuals in the population are killed when the switch is induced by UV-light (Lou, C. et al.,2010). Another mechanism tested has been a flipases system where the DNA is inverted by specific recognition sites. The system was found to function but was limited by the robustness of the flipase systems and knowledge about their function (Ham, T.S. et al.,2008). Another general problem with the construction of synthetic switches is the loss of function over time (Canton, B. et al.,2008). The limited function and stability of existing switches also limit the application to short time spans. Based on these problems we saw the untapped potential in designing a novel biological switch.</p>
-
</body>
+
<p align="justify">Our switch design is a complex regulatory system, which is induced with the help of input plasmids carrying inducible promoters.  However due to the complexity of the design of the bistable switch it was out of the scope of this project to construct the entire switch. Therefore focus was put on characterizing the key regulatory subparts needed for successful switch function. Characterizing subparts also enable future teams to use them in other contexts.</p>
-
</html>
+
<table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9a/Intro_switch.png" align="center">
 +
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 1</b>: A simplified illustration of our bistable switch.</p></caption>
 +
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/9/9a/Intro_switch.png"  width="400px"></td></tr>
 +
</table><br>
 +
<font color="#990000" face="arial" size="5">
 +
<br> 
 +
<b>Design of our switch</b><br><br>
 +
  </font>
-
= '''Introduction''' =
+
<p align="justify"> We have set up the complete design for a bistable switch. The main design criteria has been that the switch should be able to toggle  back and forth between states, stay in its induced state until it receives another input and remain stable through subsequent generations. These criteria imply that:
-
==== '''Overall Goal''' ====
+
<ul>
-
The goal of our project is to enable colonies of ''E. coli'' bacteria to transition between production of two different reporter proteins. In our system, switching between states will be induced by exposing the bacteria to light. Each of the states will have a specific frequency associated with it. There are multiple potential applications for biologicals "switches" such as these, this includes the improved control of production of additives in industrial biotechnological processes.
+
<li>It should be designed without induction by UV-light.</li>
 +
<li>It should not be based on essential native regulatory mechanisms.</li>
 +
<li>It should be possible to incorporate into the genome for stable replication, and function in subsequent generations.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<p align="justify">A simplified version of our switch design can be illustrated using a basic  SR (Set-Reset) flip flop circuit used when representing electronic circuits. It provides feedback from its outputs to its inputs and is commonly used in memory circuits to store data bits. The term flip-flop relates to the actual operation of the device, as it can be "Flipped" into one logic state or "Flopped" back into another <a href="http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/sequential/seq_1.html" target="_blank"> (reference)</a>. For further description on the logical behavior and requirements of switches see the <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Modelling" target="_blank">modeling section</a>.</p>
 +
<table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/53/SRflipflop.png" align="center">
 +
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 2</b>: SR flip-flop switch.</p></caption>
 +
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/5/53/SRflipflop.png"  width="200px"></td></tr>
 +
</table><br>
 +
<p align="justify">The switch design is based on phage regulatory systems. We used the repressor/anti-represor system from the Gifsy phages and an anti-termination system from the lambda-phage.</p>
 +
<p align="justify"> The switch has three levels of regulatory mechanisms to ensure a stable expression and tight control and thereby creating a robust bistable switch (see Figure 3):
 +
<ol>
 +
<li>The first level is negative feed back control - repression of the uninduced state of the switch.</li>
 +
<li>The second level is a positive feed back mechanism with a threshold level that when triggered will induce the third level of regulation - antitermination allows third level to be induced.</li>
 +
<li>The third regulatory level is a positive feed back mechanism stabilizing the expression of the winning state by, anti-repression of the repression from the loosing states.</li>
 +
</ol></p>
-
==== '''Project Concept''' ====
+
<table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/1/14/Threestages.png" align="center">
-
As previously stated, the main goal of our project is to design a bistable switch. The switching between the two states will be controlled by the introduction of two different wavelengths of light, each wavelength responsible for the induction of a different state. As a proof of concept, we’re using fluorescent proteins as reporter genes which makes it easy to observe and characterise the system. In principle, however, any reporter gene can be used.  
+
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 3</b>: Simplified representation of the regulatory mechanisms: [<b>1</b>] negative feed back control of opposite side. [<b>2</b>] positive feed back trigger mechanism for side commitment. [<b>3</b>] positive feed back mechanism, by canceling the opposite sides repressor.</p></caption>
 +
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/1/14/Threestages.png"  width="400px"></td></tr>
 +
</table><br>
 +
<p align="justify">For an in depth description of the function and origin of the regulatory parts have a look into the <a href=" https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Switch" target="_blank">switch</a> section.</p>
 +
<p align="justify">One important feature of the switch is the strength of the promoters. For the switch to work properly we need promoters of equal strength. To solve this problem we utilized a <a href=" https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL" target="_blank">synthetic promoter library</a>, enabling us to generate a library of promoters with a wide variety of different strengths.</p>
-
Our original project concept revolved around using light-receptors to instigate the switch between the two stable state. It was thought that the production of the first reporter protein would be induced by red light (660 nm). At the same time, production of the other reporter will be suppressed by a coexpressed repressor. Conversely, production of the second reporter would be induced by blue light (470 nm). Bistability of the system is achieved by using two repressors which negatively regulate each other’s expression. This enables the system to sustain state without continuous input, i. e. once production of a reporter protein is initiated, it will persist until the system is forced into the other state.
+
<font color="#990000" face="arial" size="5">
-
[[Image:DTU_Project_illustration_1.png‎|400px|center]]
+
<br> 
 +
<b>Characterizing phage regulatory mechanisms</b><br><br>
 +
  </font>
-
Our project concept has since changed to using two different carbohydrate sources as a means of switching between the two stable states. This means that the state in which the bacteria will be found depends on which one of two carbohydrate sources it was last exposed.
 
-
= '''Background''' =
+
<p align="justify">The main regulatory parts of the switch are the repressor/antirepressor system from the Gifsy phages and the anti-terminator system from lambda phage, see Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6.</p>
-
(INTRODUCTION)
+
 +
<table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/c8/DTU_anitsystem.png" align="center">
 +
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 4</b>: Graphical presentation of the repressor part of our regulatory system from the Gifsy phages.</p></caption>
 +
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/c8/DTU_anitsystem.png"  width="225px"></td></tr>
 +
</table><br>
-
== Biological switches ==
+
<table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/2/26/Repressor_antirepressor.png" align="center">
-
what is a biological switch, examples and existing constructions,
+
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 5</b>: Graphical presentation of the anti-repressor part of our regulatory system from the Gifsy phages.</p></caption>
-
What can we use it for. what have been build.
+
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/2/26/Repressor_antirepressor.png"  width="350px"></td></tr>
-
Many small cuircuits have been constructed. And reviews have been done on also trying to build regulatory function in enzymes.                   See article (“Designing switchable enzymes” Marc Ostermeier)
+
</table><br>
-
== Fluorescence Proteins ==
+
<table class="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/a4/DTU_repressorsystem.png" align="center">
-
as we departed in the idea from the terminator screening plasmids described in the partsregistry.org (REFFF) we had a primary focus on fluorescence proteins as our reporter systems. Further we wanted to have high quality data, with a high resolution. We descided on the in-house expertice on using a continous microfermentor system that can measure two fluorescence proteins continuously (biolector) and a flow cytometer, also capable of measuring at two different wave length.   
+
<caption align="bottom"><p align="justify"><b>Figure 6</b>: Graphical presentation of the anti-terminator part of our regulatory system from the lambda phage.</p></caption>
 +
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/a/a4/DTU_repressorsystem.png" width="180px"></td></tr>
 +
</table><br>
-
== Micro fermentor systems ==
 
-
description of the biolector
 
-
and a few references
 
-
== Flow cytometry ==
 
-
Description of flow cytometry a few references
 
-
== The RNA Polymerase (RNAP) ==
+
<p align="justify">As a proof of concept for the regulatory mechanisms, we constructed plasmids that were able to test the regulatory mechanism and strength of the two systems. We used low copy number plasmids and fluorescent proteins as reporters. For more information about the experimental setup and characterization results of the Repressor - Anti-Repressor system please click <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Repressor_Section" target="_blank">here</a> and for the Terminator - Anti-Terminator system please click <a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/AntiTermination_Section" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
-
In synthetic biology when creating the minimal cell  XXX factors have been identified as essential for normal function of RNAP, both regarding normal elongation but also in terms of normal termination function. (REFFF) of these XXX have been identified to take part in regulatory function. While the rest is core subunits. Of interest for regulation in terms of termination Anti-termination will be highlighted:
+
-
* NusA:
+
-
* NusG:
+
-
* NusE
+
-
* NusB
+
-
Due to the construction of the RNAP of many subcomponents and systems, the function of the RNAP can be regulated by only adding or changing one or a few factors. This is the mechanism in the different termination and anti-termination functions described below.
+
-
Figure and table containing normal transcription and normal termination and table with sub-part names and explanation.
+
<p align="justify">The key parts of the regulatory systems have been tested and are available as BioBricks through the parts registry. See the <a href=" https://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Parts" target="_blank">parts</a> page for a list of available parts. </p>
 +
<font color="#990000" face="arial" size="5">
 +
<br> 
 +
<b>Conclusion</b><br><br>
 +
  </font>
-
== Termination ===
+
<p align="justify">We have shown that the Gifsy repressor system has a sufficient tight expression and control to be used in the future construction of biological switches.</p>
-
(terminator introduction)
+
-
Termination can fall into one of two catagories:
+
-
* ''Intrinsic Termination''
+
-
* ''Factor-dependent Termination''
+
-
==== Intrinsic Termination ====
+
<p align="justify">We have set up the frame work for testing anti-terminator function, but further characterization is needed before it can be applied in standard regulatory systems.</p>
-
'''Intrinsic Termination''' can be found to occur at defined template sequences, usually a region of hyphenated inverted sequence symmetry followed by a run of T residues. Termination through intrinsic terminators is stimulated by additional factors, e.g. NusA. Termination occurs due to the stem-loop structure formed by the base-pairing of mRNA with itself caused by inverted sequence symmetry, followed by the run of T residues. The NusA protein causes the RNA-p complex to temporarily stall at the stem-loop structure, when this is followed by a poly-A tail, the RNA-DNA duplex is destabilized. This causes the RNA-p to dissociate from the DNA, thereby terminating transcription.
+
-
Termination function step-by-step.
+
-
Factor dependent Termination
+
-
==== Factor dependent Termination ====
+
<p align="justify">Furthermore we have designed and demonstrated the functionality of a Synthetic Promoter Library, compatible with the BioBrick standard. We have also developed a standard for integrating a BioBrick compatible Synthetic Promoter Library in bacteria in order to fine-tune the expression of BioBrick parts and devices.</p>
-
'''Factor-dependent Termination''' occurs due to events that are not directly related to transcription, such as the release of ribosomes from nascent transcript or DNA damage. One such host termination factor is Rho, which acts on many sites along the bacterial chromosome.
+
-
(( ??MFD, is a host termination factor that is responsible for releasing RNA-p stalled at sites of UV-induced DNA lesions. ??))
+
-
rho-dependent termination is characterized by not having a specific hairpin structure involved in the termination.
+
-
The termination thus happens  whendue to XXXXXX, and what have been found of the termination site any commen sequences or consensus ?????????????????
+
-
the function of rho dependent termination, have been shown to be affected by XXXX.
+
-
The rho binding sites on the mRNA, have been identified from XXbp to XXXbp of stream of the termination site.
+
-
Rho-termination is thus an example of the more complex termination regulation that is not fully understood and can be very difficult to define and use for  engineering purposes. Thus for a more defined anti-termination system the lambda N-protein system and the interaction with the nut-site in the phage genome ????? is a more defined system.
+
-
Recent research have found out that the Rho termination
+
 +
<p align="justify">We hope that this work will inspire future teams to take up the challenge of constructing a genetic bistable switch. They can easily benefit from the new DTU Synthetic Promoter Library standard and our submitted BioBricks.</p>
 +
</td>
 +
<td width="163px" height="100%" valign="top">
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
  </font>
 +
</table>
-
== Phages ==
+
<!-- Main content area -->
-
What do they need to be succesfull? How stable have the function been proved to be. Examples of known phage regulation systems.  Lambda, p21, P22, gifsy1,2,3,. What does the genomes contain of proteins, mRNA, binding sequences,  ANJA??? Identification of mechanisms in regulation, compare with the Chinese paper (hong kong) using cI protein and UV-radiation.
+
-
Link from phages to anti-terminator and/or Repressor function in phages (next sections)
+
 +
</body>
-
== Phage Repressor System ==
+
</html>
-
Maya Lisa anja
+
-
 
+
-
==== Alpha-repressor ====
+
-
 
+
-
The C1-repressor is responsible for repressing transcription of the lytic genes, thereby maintaining the stable lysogenic state. The induction of the lytic state is caused by activated RecA, which stimulates the self-cleavage of the C1-repressor. We will be using the C1-repressor in our system.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
==  Phage Anti-Termination system ==
+
-
(INTRO)
+
-
 
+
-
Anti-Termination is the process by which the termination of gene transcription is prevented. Such control of gene transcription can be found in the phage Lambda system. The mechanism is controlled by proteins, such as the lambda N or lambda Q-proteins. The expression of early genes and late genes are both regulated by the anti-termination mechanism, controlled by the lambda N-protein and the lambda Q-protein, respectively.
+
-
The N-protein is able to suppress transcription termination at both factor-dependent and factor-independent termination sites. N anti-termination is strongly stimulated by the NusA protein. Unlike the N-protein, the Q-protein specifically binds to a DNA sequence immediately upstream of the pR´ promoter.
+
-
 
+
-
(FIGURE + FIGURE TEXT)
+
-
 
+
-
A more detailed explanation of these anti-termination mechanisms will be posted later on.
+
-
The mechanism of N-protein nut-site termination have been studied heavily the last years and the current best  descriped mechanism  have been done in a couple of reviews (XXXXX,XXXX,XXXX)  The anti-termination function by introduction of the N-protein (or equivalent) that interacts with nusA and disrupt the termination.
+
-
Of known systems can be mentioned lambda, p21, p22 FUNCTION XXXXXXXXXXXX shown in the figure below. 
+
-
In the known systems the nut site is placed from XXX bp to XXX bp upstream of the termination steam loop. (REFERENCES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IMPORTANT  - read two gottersman 2010 – crystallography papers)))) figures from papers on antitermination.  Few papers descripe and test the the actual  needed distance from the termination steam loop. From other systems and mechanism it is known that XXX bp is needed for regulation of RNAP or DNAP. (MOGENS ABOUT REFERENCES AND SYSTEMS SEE MICRO-BIO-TEXT BOOKS_) .
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
==== N-protein plasmid ====
+
-
The N protein were isolated from salmonella genomic DNA with specific designed primers. We used the natural occurring RBS site, as a High expression of N have shown non specific anti-termination effect on a global scale on the genome. [[#References References]]
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
==== nut sites ====
+
-
Severel papers analyse the function of the nut-site. It has been shown that this mechanism can be manipulated in different manners and that the function can be canceled and reactivated by counter-mutations in XXXXX (REFFFFF). Futher it has been shown that the specificity of the N-proteins can be changed from lambda to P22 by only a few mutations showing a possible coevolution, or possible interactions to increase possible genomic randomization (REFFF).
+
-
(Complexicity)
+
-
 
+
-
== Synthetic promoter library (SPL) ==
+
-
How does it work, examples, what have it been used to characterize?
+
-
how do you construct it? Figures and illustrations to explain.
+
-
Figures to explain our use? And example on our specific design primer sequences illustration on the double stranded DNA, with BB - prefix suffix.
+
-
 
+
-
= Design and engineering of bi[o]stable =
+
-
The THEORETICAL overall aim and vision<br>
+
-
(THE bigger picture and STORY)<br>
+
-
APPLICATIONS<br>
+
-
how we designed our switch - selection of parts and parameters - and last presentation of our system.<br>
+
-
 
+
-
Applications
+
-
Unsertainties and potential problems:
+
-
By designing the switch we did not know the exact distance needed from the nut-site to the terminator steam loop for proper function of anti-termination. We have taken the sequence form the natural seting and made it small enough to give sense as a biological building block.
+
-
 
+
-
We have tried to utilize the phage regulation to construct a biological switch  that can be used in biological engineering.
+
-
When considering how to characterize the subparts of our system we looked at the work already done to characterize terminator efficiency.  The screening plasmids made by (REFF) endy and XXX and XXX.  The work clearly demonstrates the problem by creating a weldefined data sheet system, the data achived in terms of terminator efficiency is not consistent, and shows the complexity of biology.
+
-
It has not been possible for us do all the test needed to develop a wel defined switch system. Below is outlined our approach and in the end we suggest other approaches and possibilities for further work, and considerations in relation to this.
+
-
 
+
-
== Presentation ==
+
-
Figures and illustrations - explanations
+
-
 
+
-
== Designing the switch - selecting parts==
+
-
(modeling)
+
-
Requirements before a biological switch functions. On the paper and theoretically.
+
-
Components of the switch
+
-
We have decided not to use cI, why? The hong kong paper flaws!! (REF)  we did not use UV-activation why?  To have a stable system we did not what to use cI and UV-regulatory systems as they can impose problems with the genetic stability.
+
-
 
+
-
==== Repressor anti-Repressor system ====
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
==== Selecting N protein and nut site ====
+
-
In the end, after evaluating what component pair to use we selected λ N-protein and nut-site. Different nut-sites N-protein systems have been identified and investigated (REFFF), the nutsites for λ-phage and p21, p22, are the best described (REFFF) comparison of the antiterminator effect have not been charfully investigated, as emphasis have been on function and interacting parts. we wanted to selected the nutsite with a strong consistent anti-terminator effect. But as this was not well defined continues work was done with the lambda nut side because more articles and knowledge was available, for potential trouble shooting and improvement of the system interaction and dynamic.
+
-
What have been described is that the N-nut-site pair have specific function and thus the λ-N-protein was used for continues, construction of the switch.
+
-
 
+
-
==== Flourescene protein ====
+
-
Why were the shown proteins selected.
+
-
 
+
-
==== The Biolector ====
+
-
selected filters in releation to flourescence protein<br>
+
-
The filters for the biolector is ordered individually to fit the required needs and proteins. we decided to order the filters we needed for this application.
+
-
 
+
-
Filters applied for this experimentWe chose
+
-
RED:
+
-
Green:
+
-
 
+
-
= Characterizing BBricks as parts of the switch =
+
-
'''(Materials and Methods)''' section<br>
+
-
 
+
-
Mainly the hard control of the switch is due to a double regulation system build on a both terminator-anti-terminator and repressor anti-repressor regulation. It was out of the scope of this project to construct the entire theoretical developed switch, and characterize the fully constructed switch. Have focused on characterizing the two regulatory systems individually. This was done in order to investigate if the responses were satisfactory to use in a future complete switch construction. (????  By getting the regulatory mechanism of the subparts we further, by modeling, could conclude constraints for successful function of the system and other subparts.
+
-
In this section we describe the design of and the experimental setup used to characterize the subparts of the system and our bio-bricks.
+
-
 
+
-
== Anti-terminator function ==
+
-
(experimental work)
+
-
 
+
-
==== selecting supparts ====
+
-
Why were these supparts chosen ?<br>
+
-
AIM
+
-
 
+
-
==== Design and experimental setup ====
+
-
'''presentation - Figure of setup and explanation'''
+
-
 
+
-
==== Materials and methods ====
+
-
HOW ? what plasmids and why, what measurering method and why?
+
-
refer to the notebook page with protocols - and actual info from lab.
+
-
 
+
-
'''mRNA-stability'''
+
-
when introducing non-coding sequences problems will acour  with rna-degredation of RNAP is not attracted to the area, to fast degredation, unwanted steam loops. (Reference to the terminator screening plasmids for BB)
+
-
 
+
-
'''Synthetic promoter library (SPL)'''<br>
+
-
How does it work, examples, what have it been used to characterize?
+
-
how do you construct it? Figures and illustrations to explain.
+
-
Figures to explain our use? And example on our specific design primer sequences illustration on the double stranded DNA, with BB - prefix suffix.
+
-
 
+
-
==== Results ====
+
-
comments to the results and reference to the BB pages with info and results.
+
-
 
+
-
== Repressor function ==
+
-
(experimental work)
+
-
 
+
-
==== selecting supparts ====
+
-
Why were these supparts chosen ?<br>
+
-
AIM
+
-
 
+
-
==== Design and experimental setup ====
+
-
'''presentation - Figure of setup and explanation'''
+
-
 
+
-
==== Materials and methods ====
+
-
HOW ? what plasmids and why, what measurering method and why?
+
-
refer to the notebook page with protocols - and actual info from lab.
+
-
 
+
-
==== Results ====
+
-
comments to the results and reference to the BB pages with info and results.
+
-
 
+
== References ==
== References ==
-
* (Gottesman et.al. 2002) Gottesman. Max E, Nudler. Evgeny,  2002  ”Transcription termination and anti-termination in E.coli”  Genes to cells.  (a good introduction review to termination function)
+
* Canton, B. et al. Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices. Nature Biotechnology 26, 787-793, (2008)
-
 
+
* Ham, T.S. et al. Design and construction of a double inversion recombination Switch for Heritable Sequential Genetic Memory. PloS ONE 3(7),(2008)
-
* (Franklin et.al. 1989) NC Franklin, JH Doelling - Am Soc Microbiol "Overexpression of N antitermination proteins of bacteriophages lambda, 21, and P22: loss of N protein specificity." - Journal of bacteriology, 1989
+
* Lou, C. et al. Synthesizing a novel genetic sequential logic circuit: a push-on push-off switch. Mol Syst Biol 6,  (2010)
-
 
+
* [1] http://syntheticbiology.org/FAQ.html
-
* (Jensen 2004) Ole Nørregaard Jensen, “Modification-specific proteomics: characterization of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 8, no. 1 (February 2004): 33-41.
+
* [2]http://www.nature.com.globalproxy.cvt.dk/nrg/journal/v6/n7/execsumm/nrg1637.html
 +
* [3]http://www.nature.com.globalproxy.cvt.dk/msb/journal/v2/n1/full/msb4100073.html
 +
* [4]www.partsregistry.org

Latest revision as of 03:58, 28 October 2010

Welcome to the DTU iGEM wiki!


Project Concept

As previously stated, the main goal of our project is to design a bistable switch. We want to enable bacteria to transition between two stable states. In our system, switching between states will be induced by two different inputs and each of the states will have a specific output associated with it.

Our original project concept evolved around building a switch that we could turn on and off continuously. Not only did we want the switch to be able to switch states, but we also wanted it to be able to stay in a certain state without having to induce it constantly. Several designs were discussed, for example using light at different wavelengths to induce the system.

During the last couple of years several attempts have been made to construct bistable switches. One switch design is a one input, two outputs stable switch. It has a stable output but it looses the switching ability and 90% of the individuals in the population are killed when the switch is induced by UV-light (Lou, C. et al.,2010). Another mechanism tested has been a flipases system where the DNA is inverted by specific recognition sites. The system was found to function but was limited by the robustness of the flipase systems and knowledge about their function (Ham, T.S. et al.,2008). Another general problem with the construction of synthetic switches is the loss of function over time (Canton, B. et al.,2008). The limited function and stability of existing switches also limit the application to short time spans. Based on these problems we saw the untapped potential in designing a novel biological switch.

Our switch design is a complex regulatory system, which is induced with the help of input plasmids carrying inducible promoters. However due to the complexity of the design of the bistable switch it was out of the scope of this project to construct the entire switch. Therefore focus was put on characterizing the key regulatory subparts needed for successful switch function. Characterizing subparts also enable future teams to use them in other contexts.

Figure 1: A simplified illustration of our bistable switch.



Design of our switch

We have set up the complete design for a bistable switch. The main design criteria has been that the switch should be able to toggle back and forth between states, stay in its induced state until it receives another input and remain stable through subsequent generations. These criteria imply that:

  • It should be designed without induction by UV-light.
  • It should not be based on essential native regulatory mechanisms.
  • It should be possible to incorporate into the genome for stable replication, and function in subsequent generations.

A simplified version of our switch design can be illustrated using a basic SR (Set-Reset) flip flop circuit used when representing electronic circuits. It provides feedback from its outputs to its inputs and is commonly used in memory circuits to store data bits. The term flip-flop relates to the actual operation of the device, as it can be "Flipped" into one logic state or "Flopped" back into another (reference). For further description on the logical behavior and requirements of switches see the modeling section.

Figure 2: SR flip-flop switch.


The switch design is based on phage regulatory systems. We used the repressor/anti-represor system from the Gifsy phages and an anti-termination system from the lambda-phage.

The switch has three levels of regulatory mechanisms to ensure a stable expression and tight control and thereby creating a robust bistable switch (see Figure 3):

  1. The first level is negative feed back control - repression of the uninduced state of the switch.
  2. The second level is a positive feed back mechanism with a threshold level that when triggered will induce the third level of regulation - antitermination allows third level to be induced.
  3. The third regulatory level is a positive feed back mechanism stabilizing the expression of the winning state by, anti-repression of the repression from the loosing states.

Figure 3: Simplified representation of the regulatory mechanisms: [1] negative feed back control of opposite side. [2] positive feed back trigger mechanism for side commitment. [3] positive feed back mechanism, by canceling the opposite sides repressor.


For an in depth description of the function and origin of the regulatory parts have a look into the switch section.

One important feature of the switch is the strength of the promoters. For the switch to work properly we need promoters of equal strength. To solve this problem we utilized a synthetic promoter library, enabling us to generate a library of promoters with a wide variety of different strengths.


Characterizing phage regulatory mechanisms

The main regulatory parts of the switch are the repressor/antirepressor system from the Gifsy phages and the anti-terminator system from lambda phage, see Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6.

Figure 4: Graphical presentation of the repressor part of our regulatory system from the Gifsy phages.


Figure 5: Graphical presentation of the anti-repressor part of our regulatory system from the Gifsy phages.


Figure 6: Graphical presentation of the anti-terminator part of our regulatory system from the lambda phage.


As a proof of concept for the regulatory mechanisms, we constructed plasmids that were able to test the regulatory mechanism and strength of the two systems. We used low copy number plasmids and fluorescent proteins as reporters. For more information about the experimental setup and characterization results of the Repressor - Anti-Repressor system please click here and for the Terminator - Anti-Terminator system please click here.

The key parts of the regulatory systems have been tested and are available as BioBricks through the parts registry. See the parts page for a list of available parts.


Conclusion

We have shown that the Gifsy repressor system has a sufficient tight expression and control to be used in the future construction of biological switches.

We have set up the frame work for testing anti-terminator function, but further characterization is needed before it can be applied in standard regulatory systems.

Furthermore we have designed and demonstrated the functionality of a Synthetic Promoter Library, compatible with the BioBrick standard. We have also developed a standard for integrating a BioBrick compatible Synthetic Promoter Library in bacteria in order to fine-tune the expression of BioBrick parts and devices.

We hope that this work will inspire future teams to take up the challenge of constructing a genetic bistable switch. They can easily benefit from the new DTU Synthetic Promoter Library standard and our submitted BioBricks.

References