Team:Chiba/System 2/Result

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(2.Characterization Plux inv-GFP)
(Results)
 
(6 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 245: Line 245:
===<font size="5">Abstract</font>===
===<font size="5">Abstract</font>===
-----
-----
-
LuxR is AHL-dependent activator.LuxR-AHL complex binds lux box, 20-bp sequence centered at position -42.5 from starting site and activates transcription.However lux box is inserted between -35 and -10 ,LuxR functions as AHL-dependent inverter (Plux inv). Plux inv was resistered in Biobrick number R0061.We've prepared Plux inv-GFP and characterized about it.<br><br><br>
+
LuxR is AHL-dependent activator. LuxR-AHL complex binds lux box, 20-bp sequence centered at position -42.5 from starting site and activates transcription. However lux box is inserted between -35 and -10, LuxR functions as AHL-dependent inverter (Plux inv). Plux inv was resistered in Biobrick number R0061. We've prepared Plux inv-GFP and characterized about it.<br><br><br>
===<font size="5">Experiments</font>===
===<font size="5">Experiments</font>===
Line 262: Line 262:
strain:DH10B<br>
strain:DH10B<br>
sample<br>
sample<br>
-
1,Plux inv-GFP and Plac-LuxR(PSB1A3) <br>
+
1,Plux inv-GFP and Plac-LuxR(PSB1A3) AHL0 nM and AHL 1000 nM<br>
2,Plux inv-GFP (Positive control)<br>
2,Plux inv-GFP (Positive control)<br>
3,Plux inv    (Negative control)<br>
3,Plux inv    (Negative control)<br>
-
add AHL1000 nM (AHL+)and
+
 
 +
 
Each sample is incubated for 12 h at 37゜C  
Each sample is incubated for 12 h at 37゜C  
Line 276: Line 277:
Pellet Photos is shown in '''Fig. 3'''.We confirmed GFP fluorescence both AHL+ and AHL-.So We're not able to confirm LuxR repression.  
Pellet Photos is shown in '''Fig. 3'''.We confirmed GFP fluorescence both AHL+ and AHL-.So We're not able to confirm LuxR repression.  
-
[[Image:Plux inv results.png|none|right|frame|Fig. 3 Pellet photos of the incubeted sample]]
+
[[Image:Plux inv results.png|thumb|left|Fig. 3 ]]
===Conclusion===
===Conclusion===
Line 283: Line 284:
However,''iGEMTokyo_tech2010'' team also charcterized about '''Plux inv''' and succeeded in repressing transcription .<br>
However,''iGEMTokyo_tech2010'' team also charcterized about '''Plux inv''' and succeeded in repressing transcription .<br>
-
It does not completely repress transcription, Plasmids, strains ,culture conditions,and detection method LuxR suppression can not be confirmed(Cox et al,2007).<br>
+
It does not completely repress transcription, Plasmids, strains ,culture conditions,and detection method LuxR suppression can not be confirmed (Cox et al,2007).<br>
<br>
<br>

Latest revision as of 08:00, 18 November 2010




 

 



<<Back

Version 2 :

Contents

Abstract


LuxR is AHL-dependent activator. LuxR-AHL complex binds lux box, 20-bp sequence centered at position -42.5 from starting site and activates transcription. However lux box is inserted between -35 and -10, LuxR functions as AHL-dependent inverter (Plux inv). Plux inv was resistered in Biobrick number R0061. We've prepared Plux inv-GFP and characterized about it.


Experiments


1.Construction of Plux inv-GFP

Construction process is shown in Fig. 1.We constructed Plux inv-GFP conbining R0061 and E0240 and transformed by strain of XL10-G.

GFP fluorescence and sequence is confirmed.

Fig. 1  Evaluation of LuxR Inverter

2.Characterization Plux inv-GFP

strain:DH10B
sample
1,Plux inv-GFP and Plac-LuxR(PSB1A3) AHL0 nM and AHL 1000 nM
2,Plux inv-GFP (Positive control)
3,Plux inv (Negative control)


Each sample is incubated for 12 h at 37゜C After incubation,Spin-dawn(14500rpm,1min) and observed the pellet in the UV.

Fig. 2 characterization of Plux inv-GFP




Results


Pellet Photos is shown in Fig. 3.We confirmed GFP fluorescence both AHL+ and AHL-.So We're not able to confirm LuxR repression.

Fig. 3

Conclusion

We're not able to confirm LuxR repression.
However,iGEMTokyo_tech2010 team also charcterized about Plux inv and succeeded in repressing transcription .

It does not completely repress transcription, Plasmids, strains ,culture conditions,and detection method LuxR suppression can not be confirmed (Cox et al,2007).

Reference


  1. Egland.K.A, and Greenberg.E.P, Conversion of the Vibrio Fischeri Transcriptional Activator,LuxR, to a Repressor, J. Bacteriol., 182, P.805-811 (2000)
  2. Cox.R.S.3rd, Surette.M.G, Elowitz.M.B, Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters, Mol Syst Biol, 3 ,145 (2007)