Team:Chiba/Safety

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 192: Line 192:
   <hr width="500" size="1" align="left"><br>
   <hr width="500" size="1" align="left"><br>
<strong><font size="2">Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:      </strong></font><br>
<strong><font size="2">Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:      </strong></font><br>
 +
&nbsp;
  Our theme is double click system in bacteria and we expect that it will be used for eliminating false input.<br>  
  Our theme is double click system in bacteria and we expect that it will be used for eliminating false input.<br>  
It can raise accuracy of work to the target and reduce side effect by responding double click.<br>
It can raise accuracy of work to the target and reduce side effect by responding double click.<br>
Line 197: Line 198:
<strong><font size="2"> Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
<strong><font size="2"> Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
       </strong></font><br>
       </strong></font><br>
 +
&nbsp;
  We've desinged pulse generator and some hybrid promoters. We've also registed the parts.<br>
  We've desinged pulse generator and some hybrid promoters. We've also registed the parts.<br>
We think construction of these parts can be used as safety device.<br>
We think construction of these parts can be used as safety device.<br>
Line 204: Line 206:
Because, reaction must be done in fixed time whose the protein exists in. <br><br>
Because, reaction must be done in fixed time whose the protein exists in. <br><br>
<strong><font size="2">Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? </font></strong><br>
<strong><font size="2">Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? </font></strong><br>
 +
&nbsp;
  aaa<br><br>
  aaa<br><br>
<strong><font size="2">Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </font></strong><br>
<strong><font size="2">Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </font></strong><br>
-
  aaa<br><br>
+
&nbsp;
 +
  bbb<br><br>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>

Revision as of 08:53, 27 October 2010




 




Safety issue


Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
  Our theme is double click system in bacteria and we expect that it will be used for eliminating false input.
It can raise accuracy of work to the target and reduce side effect by responding double click.
We hope this system to be used for safety device on labs.

Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
  We've desinged pulse generator and some hybrid promoters. We've also registed the parts.
We think construction of these parts can be used as safety device.
For example, hybrid promoter is low unregulated and repression for the promoter is stronger than activation for.
So, expression of DNA occurs in specific environment which can mean safety device.
If reaction needs the protein expressed by pulse, the pulse also can be safety device.
Because, reaction must be done in fixed time whose the protein exists in.

Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
  aaa

Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
  bbb


Go to safety page.