Team:Cambridge/Bioluminescence/Luciferin Regeneration

From 2010.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Our Experiments)
Line 19: Line 19:
We tested both the ''L. cruciata'' and ''P. pyralis'' luciferases with and without LRE on our plate reader, kindly on loan from [http://www.bmglabtech.com/ BMG Labtech]. The results showed that when D-cysteine was added to the reaction, the light output was brighter and lasted for longer. This proved that both the working of LRE to produce CHBT and the conversion of CHBT into luciferin worked as expected.  
We tested both the ''L. cruciata'' and ''P. pyralis'' luciferases with and without LRE on our plate reader, kindly on loan from [http://www.bmglabtech.com/ BMG Labtech]. The results showed that when D-cysteine was added to the reaction, the light output was brighter and lasted for longer. This proved that both the working of LRE to produce CHBT and the conversion of CHBT into luciferin worked as expected.  
-
However, the conversion from CHBT to luciferin by adding L-cysteine was found to not work.
+
However, the conversion from CHBT to luciferin via L-luciferin by adding L-cysteine was found to not work.
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}
{{:Team:Cambridge/Templates/footer}}

Revision as of 17:57, 23 October 2010